Geesh! Edwards Is A Fag

Update: Total wuss. Afraid of a little Fox!

I mean as in wuss! See, imo, that's partly where Coulter went wrong. It's still an adolescent crack. But when you're teasing someone about being a wuss, I think you use fag. I've heard gay folks use it to tease people, too - that and queen. But faggot - to me that sounds harsh and unfunny somehow.

And, yes, Edwards is a wuss, punk, mope, or candy ass - call it what you want. Maybe cry baby?

John Edwards Campaign Complains of Virtual Vandalism to their Pretend HQ

Shortly before midnight (CST) on Monday, February 26, a group of republican Second Life users, some sporting “Bush ‘08″ tags, vandalized the John Edwards Second Life HQ.

Nah. Complaining about vandalism to your HQ in second life? Sorry, the guys definitely a fag.

Comments

[Cindi]

You are what you eat.........heh.

[scarshapedstar]

Geez, it really is all about the Overton window for you guys.

Say, isn't Dan "The Ladies' Man™ (And By That I Mean Totally Not A Fag)" Riehl still single? Interesting. Is he still repulsed by the clitoris? Even more interesting...

...of course, most interesting of all: evidently Cindi doesn't know what the clitoris is for, either! Or at least her significant other doesn't; otherwise, I doubt she would insult every man who enjoys cunnilingus. Bear in mind, she once declared that "spirituality is above an orgasm". (Did anyone else just have that "poor, unfortunate souls" song from The Little Mermaid pop into their head? No? Ah well.)

I swear, someday, somehow, I'm gonna make all these wingnuts listen to "Sexual Healing" by Marvin Gaye.

[Jeff]

Ohohoh that was a good one scar. I'm kind of getting sick of these people coming here and not offering an original idea or argument (or any non-original for that matter) and just go around insulting everyone. It doesn't say anything about the person being insulted (maybe in 9th grade I would have been hurt (if it was me being insulted)), but it says something very bad about the person doing the insulting, and its not good. Grow up scar, you aren't 14 (I assume), if you have nothing good to add, just leave.

So this story made me laugh. But the reaction is what really deserves a laugh. I mean, is this what campaigning is going to be in a few years? Hillary Clinton sitting behind her computer talking to 23 year olds who have not job, saying "I want to start a conversation with you"?

It's pretty funny, no one would have noticed this is it wasn't for Edwards making a statement. If Jesus saw how big a baby Edwards was being I think he would be ashamed. :p

I was getting worried because Edwards was testing well against the republicans, and I was thinking he might gain ground, but two stupid things in two days... even for a Democrat that's bad.

[Legalize]

"Ohohoh that was a good one scar. I'm kind of getting sick of these people coming here and not offering an original idea or argument (or any non-original for that matter) and just go around insulting everyone. It doesn't say anything about the person being insulted (maybe in 9th grade I would have been hurt (if it was me being insulted)), but it says something very bad about the person doing the insulting, and its not good. Grow up scar, you aren't 14 (I assume), if you have nothing good to add, just leave."

You need to get out of Amherst every now and again, Jeff. A friend of mine from college runs a bed and breakfast in Key West. If you like I can get you her contact information.

[TheSpartan]

Funny how Dan went from condemning Ann to joining her all in the span of 24hrs.

[Andrew]

"I've heard gay folks use it to tease people"

I wonder what bar you heard that?

[Legalize]

It's pretty predictable, Spartan. After pretending to be irritated by her, they are coming to grips with the fact that this is who they are. This is how they've thought all along, and they are coming out of the closet, so to speak; they finally feel more comfortable expressing their biggotry and hate without proxies like Anne Coulter to do their talking for them.

[Legalize]

"I've heard gay folks use it to tease people"

I've heard black folks call each other the n-word too. Who does he think he is? Come on, Riehl; you know you want to call Obama the n-word. Now that you are comfortable slurring homosexuals, why not let it all hang out (as it were)?

[Oregonian]

Does this mean Dan is getting more comfortable with the labels and is about to come out of the closet? Or is this just his own self-loathing erupting again? I can't decide...

[Hard Right]

Edwards isn't a fag. He is a whiny bitch tho.

[Hard Right]

Legalize, shut up and quit being a hypocrite. You've slurred Conservatives just like you accuse Dan of insulting homosexuals.

[Hard Right]

WTH is Edwards doing connected to this Second Life place?

http://www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2007/02/dutch_to_prosec.html

http://www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2007/01/ageplay_in_seco.html

[Legalize]

"Legalize, shut up and quit being a hypocrite. You've slurred Conservatives just like you accuse Dan of insulting homosexuals."

Haha: "shut up!" I can just see you stamping your foot and getting red in the face. Does the difference really have to be explained to you? Probably does: (a) "Conservatism" isn't an immutable characteristic, traditionally used to discriminate against people out of pure anamice, and anamice alone. (b) I don't hate conservatives. (c) My criticisms of conservatives are based on their policies - you know, what they do and say, NOT how they were born.

[Zifnab]

"I swear, someday, somehow, I'm gonna make all these wingnuts listen to "Sexual Healing" by Marvin Gaye."

But his last name is Gaye, so he must be a wuss. Also, I think I once saw him comb his hair. Definitely teh geyness.

It is nice to see Dan embracing his inner Coulter, though. Maybe that initial short-lived outrage was just directed at the fact that CPAC didn't invite him too.

[Bori]

I'd be totally laughing if I were in the third grade.

[Hard Right]

Haha: "shut up!" I can just see you stamping your foot and getting red in the face. Does the difference really have to be explained to you? Probably does: (a) "Conservatism" isn't an immutable characteristic, traditionally used to discriminate against people out of pure anamice, and anamice alone. (b) I don't hate conservatives. (c) My criticisms of conservatives are based on their policies - you know, what they do and say, NOT how they were born.

Thank you Little Richard. Calling them racists and homophobes etc. isn't criticizing their policies genius. Nice try.

[Legalize]

"Thank you Little Richard. Calling them racists and homophobes etc. isn't criticizing their policies genius. Nice try."

By God, you must be completely afflicted. It's not a "slur" to call conservatives on their actions, words, and policies, no matter how many wingers whine about victimhood and being exposed to the light of day. I am critical of the racism and homophobia that is the norm among conservatives, little ankle-biter. This norm is reflected in the policies of the GOP and conservatives, generally, as evidenced by the cheering and support Coulter gets from pre-pubescent boys whenever she drops a "controversial" bomb.

And once again, since you conveniently choose to ignore anything that gets in the way of your hive-mind thinking: conservatism isn't an immutable characteristic that a person is born with and thus has no control over.

Although, it is becoming clear that modern conservatism is a mental disorder that totally impairs the the reasoning capacities of the afflicted patient. Sadly, there doesn't appear to be a cure - for you, especially.

[Phoenix]

"anamice". "pure anamice". "and anamice alone".

Is that a spice? I bet it's a spice for barbecue and chitlins.

Or maybe he meant 'animus'. Pure hatred. Pure hatred alone.

I bet that's what that lawyer meant. He reeks of it, after all.

I bet he's a 'self-styled "liberal"' to use John Cole's description of whatever political entity he was trying to describe at the other end of the spectrum, which, by the way, skipped the middle as if no such thing exists.

[TheSpartan]

Legalize, shut up and quit being a hypocrite. You've slurred Conservatives just like you accuse Dan of insulting homosexuals.

So do conservatives now get protected minority status? I always thought it would be better covered under the ADA like retardation.

[Legalize]

Wow, Phoenix is here to render spelling lessons. Good thing, given that you have nothing of substance to add.

[Phoenix]

Hey, asshole. I was just getting down to your level. You ignored Dan's post as usual and resorted to your usual filth. Fuck you.

[Hard Right]

Spoken like the true elitest left wing idiot you are. You say you criticize their "policies". YOU infered that racism and homophobia are part of their policies. Now you've gone and sai they are usually racist and homophobic. That's a smear, a slur, or whatever you want to call it. As usual you leftists want to have it both ways. You want to criticize others for slurs then pretend you didn't do the same. I pointed this out to you and you had a fit. Another leftist trait-projection. You do little more than find ways to justify your twisted left wing ideology then accuse other of not thinking. Then you call others mentally ill? Too funny. You're just a typical loony left headcase whose ego far outstrips his intelligence or ability. Your frustration over your inadequacies is evident in the angry posts you make. Legalize, stay on the clerical side of things because rational, logical thought and debate is not your forte.

[Hard Right]

So do conservatives now get protected minority status? I always thought it would be better covered under the ADA like retardation

Like I said, leftists are guilty of projection as Spartan just showed.

[Gekkobear]

Yeah Dan I agree with Legalize.

You're mean for calling people names that might not fit.

Oh, and you're a closet racist/homophope with homosexual tendencies.

^^^ ^^^
... See what I did there? It's ironical and stuff ...

So, Edwards acts like a prissy whiner, but calling him a name to indicate that = bad. Dan (in your opinion) uses a word you think should never be used, so you call him names... entirely different.

And sccarshapedstar's focus on Dan's sex life, not at all creepy either...

Oh, you were just attacking Conservatives, which they could change... "Come on, Riehl; you know you want to call Obama the n-word." ... by name? So, attacking him personally, also still acceptable, because he's a conservative? It's ok to make up a personal attack against Dan because why?

Because you decided it must be ok to call him a racist? Now lemme guess, you're going to claim that making crap up about Riehl is ok because he could change his name, but Edwards couldn't possibly change his being a pansy?

Or was it a failed joke?

[scarshapedstar]

"Ohohoh that was a good one scar. I'm kind of getting sick of these people coming here and not offering an original idea or argument (or any non-original for that matter) and just go around insulting everyone... blah blah blah... lots of pearl-clutching"

Right. So, let's look at the brilliant first comment that started the thread.

"You are what you eat.........heh."

See, conservatives be callin' somebody a pussy like *this*, and liberals be callin' somebody a pussy like *this*...

[Legalize]

"Hey, asshole. I was just getting down to your level. You ignored Dan's post as usual and resorted to your usual filth. Fuck you."

Awwwww, look at the potty-mouth! The lack of civility! And to think, CHILDREN might read this blog! One knows one is doing something right when (a) nary a wingnut can find it within themselves to muster the intellectual bravery to take an argument head-on, as evidenced by the fact that all they can do is call names and criticize spelling; and (b) said wingnuts become unhinged to the point of hurling such foul-mouthed obscenities in such a circumstance.

"You say you criticize their "policies". YOU infered that racism and homophobia are part of their policies. Now you've gone and sai they are usually racist and homophobic. That's a smear, a slur, or whatever you want to call it."

Gee, according to someone with an interest of the outcome of that deduction? Here's a hint: your idiotic, simplistic, conclusory arguments, that assume what you are trying to prove, aren't "logical arguments." You are a walking fallacy, Limp Boy.

"As usual you leftists want to have it both ways. You want to criticize others for slurs then pretend you didn't do the same. I pointed this out to you and you had a fit."

A "fit"? Where? Oh, right, you must mean where I obliterated your argument and you failed to rebut me - again. I remember now.

"Another leftist trait-projection. You do little more than find ways to justify your twisted left wing ideology then accuse other of not thinking. Then you call others mentally ill? Too funny. You're just a typical loony left headcase whose ego far outstrips his intelligence or ability."

Careful; I think I see that vein in your forehead starting to swell. You are becoming unhinged right before our eyes. I fear we may have to up your dosage again.

"Your frustration over your inadequacies is evident in the angry posts you make."

So screams the ranting loon as it shakes its fists at the moon.

"Legalize, stay on the clerical side of things because rational, logical thought and debate is not your forte."

As evidenced by your cry-baby antics, temper tantums (like this one), and your utter inability to substantively support any loony position that pops into your head - time and time again. With geniuses such as yourself as the intellectual front-runners among the winger clan, it's no wonder the GOP is going out of business.

Have a nice day.

[Zifnab]

If you people want to stop being called racists and homophobes, stop insulting poor black people - a la Newt's "people too stupid to get out of the way of a hurricane" comment - and flinging the word faggot around on the national scene. Also, it wouldn't hurt if you stopped passing anti-Gay legislation every election cycle. And being staunch opponents of the Voting Rights Act. And it wouldn't hurt if you maybe stopped courting the KKK vote at every opportunity, Tancredo-style.

Just some suggestions.

[ET]

I vote we marginalize legalize. Ignore those shrill rantings and maybe this creep will go away, or maybe get a job.

[Hard Right]

Legalize is just mad that after going to school for all those years he STILL gets his ass kicked by laymen.
Legalize, I beat you over the head with your own words and you can't deal with it. I used exactly what you said in the way you meant it. So stop trying to claim you didn't say those things. The fact is you simply aren't very good at what you do.

[BCMG]

First of all Zifnab YOUR PARTY - the Dummocrap party - the one who firehosed civil rights marchers in the '60's - is the same party WITH a sitting feeble senator who is a Kleagle for the KKK. Get your facts straight. There are even pictures out there of him in his robes to make it easy for you libtards.
Second, Legalize you talk about our "cry baby tantrums..." etc. Who threw a 6-year long tantrum about Diebold machines, (which suddenly corrected themselves in the '06 election!) and voter intimidation, (when your party slashed tires and fired guns into Republican campaign headquarters,) and YOUR people are the ones who march around with little homemade signs with Bush with horns drawn on etc etc? You've cornered the market on throwing tantrums. You are the official, "Daddy didn't pay me enough attention" party and you love proving it every chance you get. We lost in '06 and took it like adults.

Now back on topic: big surprise - Edwards - like Legalize - is far too afraid to actually debate on facts on our turf. Silky Pony is such a wuss and we thank him for proving it. Oh! And how stupid do you have to be to shun the #1 cable news network? We call this cutting off your nose to spite your face, but this is what the left is good at. Let's just keep slacking that rope and laugh when they hang themselves, (again.)

[YourWurstNightmare]

"Hey, asshole. I was just getting down to your level. You ignored Dan's post as usual and resorted to your usual filth. Fuck you."

At least please be creative in your insults fellas. I mean "fag" is okay, kinda played out though. Try "colon commando" or "intestibne investigator" or even "ass pounder", "Felchtron: The robot from beyond Uranus", "Scrotombiscuit."

And asshole? Fuck you? Come on. Might I suggest "cunt rash" or "cockmangler"? Pehraps "tamponista", "Pussyclot", "dickscab", "black guy's sperm locker" (If you wanna drag race into this--and why not, yo?), or even "Prisonrapetowell chewer."

I own copyrights to most of these. Fair use, gentlemen.

[Zifnab]

"First of all Zifnab YOUR PARTY - the Dummocrap party - the one who firehosed civil rights marchers in the '60's - is the same party WITH a sitting feeble senator who is a Kleagle for the KKK."

Yes, it was LBJ who, in signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, firehosed civil rights marchers in the 60s. And Strom Thurman was fillibustering in the best interests of black people everywhere. MLK was a Republican. And Jimmy Carter supports abortion because he hates black babies.

I like how you need to head back 40 years to find your last incident of Democrats opposing civil rights. Not only are you historically ignorant, you're too lazy to Google someone, anyone, in Congress or the Senate who proves your point.

[Jeff]

"Thank you Little Richard. Calling them racists and homophobes etc. isn't criticizing their policies genius. Nice try."

Thanks for saying that Hard Right. You are dead on.