« Geez | Main | Typical Liberal Blogger Hypocrisy »

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d835247e7369e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Baa Baa Baa-lls:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Hmm, I wonder how many liberals they needed to castrate to get 130 lbs of sheep balls?

Seems redundant, though, they're already impotent."

Thats funny coming from a guy who supports a 4 year losing war in a 3rd world country. Happy Anniversary, btw.

Hey, cook'm if you've gottem.
Of course, according to the Daily Show, it would only take one Douglass Feith to cover the whole event.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/02/14/daily-show-douglas-feith-has-huge-balls/

Oh, and speaking of crushed testicles...

"Cassel: If the president deems that he’s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child, there is no law that can stop him?

Yoo: No treaty

Cassel: Also no law by Congress — that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…

Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that."

Man, Riehl, how much time DON'T you spend fantasizing about testicles?

Man, Legal, how much time DON'T you spend fantasizing about Dan's sex life?

You still haven't answered my question of how you KNOW Dan's never had a blowjob. Do tell, Legal.

"Man, Legal, how much time DON'T you spend fantasizing about Dan's sex life?"

Are you really this much of a ignorant slut in real life? What is your fascination with asking moronic questions that have zero connection to what anyone has said?

You still haven't answered my question of how you KNOW Dan's never had a blowjob. Do tell, Legal."

Oh, goodie, another one of your context-less inquries. What is the matter with you anyway? I've never stated that I "KNOW" Riehl has never had a blowjob. I've never even speculated.

"What is your fascination with asking moronic questions that have zero connection to what anyone has said?"

ha ha ha.... This SO proves who the ignoramus is. I've never spoken to you when I didn't use your own stupid, moronic statements. YOU make asinine statements and someone quotes them back at you for elucidation and you just piss your pants.

Man, you must be hell in court....... "Boo hoo, Your Honor....he called me a name."

By the way, you're a lowdown liar, you pantywaist. "I've never even speculated." Scroll down, asshole. We all know you're real interested in Dan's sex life - 'from grade school through high school through college'.... Your words get you every time.

"What is your fascination with asking moronic questions that have zero connection to what anyone has said?"

"ha ha ha.... This SO proves who the ignoramus is. I've never spoken to you when I didn't use your own stupid, moronic statements. YOU make asinine statements and someone quotes them back at you for elucidation and you just piss your pants."

Yeah, trouble is, you tend to have a reihlly hard time ever, like pointing out what "asinine" statements I've made, that demonstrate, in this case (I guess), that I "KNOW" that Riehl has never had a blowjob. See how that works? This is where you point out that I've said, "I KNOW Riehl has never had a blowjob" or anything of the like.

"Man, you must be hell in court....... "Boo hoo, Your Honor....he called me a name."

And you must be hell at the Dairy Queen.

"By the way, you're a lowdown liar, you pantywaist. "I've never even speculated." Scroll down, asshole. We all know you're real interested in Dan's sex life - 'from grade school through high school through college'.... Your words get you every time."

And yet again: (a) point to me where I speculated about Riehl getting a blowjob - you know, the topic YOU initiated, and (b) what the hell does making fun of Riehl have to do with being "real interested" in Riehl's sex life? I know that menopause is making you cranky, but just try to work on the hows and whys.

I just want to know how many wingers are willing to put their balls in the President's hands.

Suddenly crickets again from the *shrewd* Phoenix. I suppose I'll be waiting a while for her to point to the damning statements I've made that somehow *prove* her grand theory - again.

Shouldn't that be "the *shrew* Phoenix? Your comments about Dan never getting a blow job are from about three days ago. I'm not your step 'n fetch-it, so you'll just have to take my word. Everyone knows you've not let a sexual reference against Dan go unanswered, so if you don't want to scroll and find it for yourself, fine with me. It's out there.

"Grand theory"? Not at all. The fact is your gut responses to comments and posts are voluminous and spontaneous bursts of filth with the sole intent to insult. It's not surprising you're denying this particular one because it's kinda brokeback for you to be talking about Dan's sex life.

Too rich: "I know that menopause is making you cranky, but just try to work on the hows and whys."

Do you have the slightest conception of what statements like that do to the noble, smart image you try to portray here? Every time I call you stupid, you prove me right. Now come on back and I'll do it again.

Phoenix, his ego far outstrips his intelligence. None of his opinions of self are supported by reality. He figured he could become a lawyer and then he'd get to pay back that mean world that hurt him. Typical wannabe bully.

"Shouldn't that be "the *shrew* Phoenix?"

That'll work too.

"Your comments about Dan never getting a blow job are from about three days ago. I'm not your step 'n fetch-it, so you'll just have to take my word."

Haha. Translation: "I'm lyin and I know I can't find what I'm accusing you of." Take the word of a liar?

"Everyone knows you've not let a sexual reference against Dan go unanswered, so if you don't want to scroll and find it for yourself, fine with me. It's out there."

Yeah. You say that repeatedly, yet STILL can't point to any specific instances to, like, support your assertions. PROVE IT.

""Grand theory"? Not at all. The fact is your gut responses to comments and posts are voluminous and spontaneous bursts of filth with the sole intent to insult. It's not surprising you're denying this particular one because it's kinda brokeback for you to be talking about Dan's sex life."

And blah blah blah blah. PROVE IT.

"Do you have the slightest conception of what statements like that do to the noble, smart image you try to portray here? Every time I call you stupid, you prove me right. Now come on back and I'll do it again."

Cry me a river, shrew. You're aware that I'm not concerned about projecting nobility here, right? My interest is in pointing and laughing, not convincing. I learned long ago that goose-steppers on loony winger blogs are incapable of being swayed. You know that I am more than happy to just get you red in the face with rage and frustration every time you try to *get* me on whatever nonsense you are attempting to portray right? You can call me whatever you want; problem is you haven't the capacity to back it up - ever. Now, I know that your little fanboys like Limpy, like in all idiot echo chambers, will chear you on. But they, like you, haven't the prowess to even get from point A to point B.

So, once again: PROVE IT, shrew.

Now,

"My interest is in pointing and laughing, not convincing. I learned long ago that goose-steppers on loony winger blogs are incapable of being swayed."

Posted by: Legalize | Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 07:09 AM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shaykh sees strange lawyer boy here is stupid dhimmi and maybe gay boy like BobSucksGoats. Fancy lawyer boy doesn't care about self image, this good for when I make him dhimmi slave and he wash my camels and I beat him every day for not turning to Allah(swt).

Shaykh asks his loyal muhjahdeen to use evil Shaitan's tool of infidelnet to find out about fancy lawyer boy, and why he attacks female like a true Muslim (maybe he likes boys more than girls, or he likes goats better like loyal muhjahdeen servant) - and Shaykh learns interesting thing... (and to kuffar blog owner, do not worry. Link is safe for work, and for Allah, [swt] because Allah [swt] knows best).

Fancy Lawyer Boy used old email here of "psych_rock" at yahoo dot com. Evil Shaitan's Google finds out that he is a listener of Shaitan's music, and wrote things for a school for buffalo lawyers in Great Shaitan's New York:

http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/opinion/December2004.pdf >> see article called: "The Conservative Corner’s Fiction"

Fancy Lawyer Pants Boy is called by infidel name "Justin Whittaker", and he has silly picture, third from right behind dhimmi Chinaman:

http://law.buffalo.edu/ublawlinks/07-2006/default.asp?l1=2&f=MBA

I don't know why, but muhjahdeen servant wants to beat him in dungeon. I say to muhjahdeen servant, "stupid servant! he is a kuffar lawyer and is unclean! He might give you liberal cooties. Besides, he is very geeky and scrawny boy with glasses, and his spleen might break if you mount him like horny goat".

Also, for being a lawyer, he is stupid little kuffar. He cannot spell "perjury" (purgur) or "cheer" (chear) correctly, and he is native English speaker.

Even I, a lowly and humble Shaykh from the Emirate of al-Abama, know these things.

ha ha. Yep. His spleen might break.........

Thanks, Shayk Yurouti from the Emirate of al-Abama.

I think I'll go shake some booty...... :)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad