« WTF? | Main | NASCAR is an Emblem of Southern White Supremacism »

Sunday, February 04, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d834e09e2c53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Taking The Gloves Off:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Yawn, you cons love to dream don't you? Take a read, asshats.

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16616389.htm

It must suck to want your country to lose so badly because you're such a loser yourself.

Newsflash asshat, the US lost in Iraq a LONG time ago. Its all about damage control at this point. You kool-aid drinking cons just wont accept that, however. Who's the loser?? Dope.

More idiocy Dan? Does it ever stop with you? Please let me know if you ever want to play poker, you would obviously be the type to chase his losses. Too bad you don't get it and more than likely never will.

America has 3 main enemies1.Iraqi insurgents2.Taliban3.Democrat Party.Bush ought to deal with all of them with harshness and no mercy.

Nice to see one of your enemies is a fictional group made up by the pathetic members of the Republican Party. There is no Democrat Party and only mouth-breathing knuckledraggers would even use that term. Congrats on that Darth, you are almost as pathetic as templar knight which is quite an achievement. WTG

Why don't you guys just call it all a 'catastrophic victory' like your leader already has and call it a war? You clowns just don't know when to quit.

Rob,Artie I did not know yall were a couple.......Bush needs to stop trying to please you pansies and start blasting enemies.

Yawn, wake me when you make a point Darth. SSDD

"3.Democrat Party"

You forgot the "Jew" moneylenders.

Rob how would you liberals stem the Islamic menace?????I am waiting because your hero Jimmah Cattah did not do so well!

Like Jimmah most Democrats have never seen a fascist they didn't love or a Jew they didn't hate.

Amen Buzzy

"Rob, Artie I did not know yall were a couple.......Bush needs to stop trying to please you pansies and start blasting enemies."

Add "Carl" to the list of agitated, trolling, Caliphate-loving traitor sock puppets who keep plaguing our society with their mentally deficient logic and acidic but useless snipes.

In fact, Darth... kindly let me revise your list:

America needs to eliminate its enemies in the following order:

1) Traitorous scum who breathe sedition and lend comfort and support to our enemies. This would mean the editors of the NY Times in particular, and others who profess an allegiance to the shadowy hands of the Caliphate who seek to destroy America (such as the CAIR - who should be criminalized for aiding and abetting terrorists)

2) The Sadrists and other quasi-militias seeking to ruin the stabilisation of Iraq. The only ROE for Iraq should be "lock and load, weapons free". Without regrets.

3) Within American borders, eliminate imams and radical muslims who agitate for Caliphate and against the US government, and against our Anglo-Saxon culture.

OK, and if that wasn't enough to bake your liberal noodles, then you'll REALLY love this idea:

Perhaps a government-authorized rewrite of the Koran is in order to sanitize it from all of the nastiness of 1300+ years of jihadism... I mean, it took the better part of 1500 years for "organized Christendom" to get its act together... but then again, neither the Reformers nor the Holy See, nor the Crowned heads of Europe whom they advised, had access to nuclear technology among other more conventional WMDs.

Unfortunately, such is the case with Islam which is badly in need of a reformation*. Sadly, we in the West simply cannot wait another 500-1000 years for an Islamic Murtin Luther or John Huss or Calvin or even a Thomas Acquinas to arise to the challenge. We will have to settle for re-writing the Koran as a more civilised document after we have smashed the resurgent Caliphate to dust.

And while we are at it, defund and decertify from 501(c)3 tax-exempt status all mosques, masjids, and "Islamic Community Centers" in the USA. They should pay the tax on all those Saudi oil fat-funds they receive, just like the dhimmis pay the Jizzya tax in Saudi Arabia. Also, allow no new Islamic buildings to be constructed, just like dhimmis cannot build new churches or synagogues.

After all, if the dhimmis in Allah-land have no rights, the least we can do is to return the courtesy to the Ummah within our borders.

Call us Crusaders/Templar Knights or whatever, but even with its faults, Anglo-Saxon/Western culture is by far superior to that of Mohammed (lice and fleas be upon him).

*Of course, my opinion is that following "Mission Accomplished" in 2003, we should have sent Pat Robertson at the head of an army of Fundamentalist evangelists to convert as many of the heathens to Christ as the Good Lord has called to salvation... but that would probably make the liberals wet themselves with anguish.

"our Anglo-Saxon culture."

Hey, some of us white folk have Irish and German backgrounds, you know.

Seek there only 3 possibilities with Islam 1.Run 2.Hope it reforms3.Destroy it.....I am afraid number 3 is the only rational choice.We cannot fll from the tide.Islam will never reform.We must be prepared to fight a long ,bloody ,and no holds barred war with Islam....We can start by bombing Mecca and Medina.

thats stem the tide

I'm all for sending Pat Robertson to Iraq. And my thanks for a 'nuke Mecca' comment - hadn't seen one from the flat-earth redneck contingent in a while and thought you were getting soft. What dumbass sheep...

I hope those of you who want to leave Iraq to the crazies realize muslim fundamentialism is real and growing. They want to destroy us because of our preceived moral and ethical collapse. This war is coming sooner or later and we better be ready. Here is an item from "The Week":

"Diversity, after the small Canadian town of Herouxville, Quebec,put Muslim immigrants who wish to live there on notice that will not be allowed to stone women to death in public, burn them alive, or throw acid on them. ....the town was simply clarifying that traditional practices of other cultures "cannot be re-created here"."

@scar:

The -Saxon part of "Anglo-Saxon" is generally inclusive of Germans (The traditional Saxon homelands were in what is today the German Bundeslaender of Sachsen-Anhalt, and not to mention the plethora of modern German municipalities such as Hohensachsen, Luetzel-Sachsen, and much of Odinwald area - including Heidelberg and the Neckar-Rhein river basins).

As for Celtic -- I agree, Celts are no less white than other whites; but as a fractional Irish myself, I'll gladly acknowledge the contributions of the UK to helping Eire (Ireland) become an influential, if not successful nation state in the current era. Despite any disagreements over the Twenty-Six and Six, I think we might be able to agree that the Anglo-Saxon models of government and other civil institutions have had a much more far-reaching impact on Western Civilization than Rhaeto-Celtic models of governance.

Nevertheless, I would be remiss for not mentioning the fine Celtic traditions that help enshrine family as one of the foremost of our society's values.


@Carl: "Flat Earth Rednecks"?? Nah. Most of us here at the Great Conservative Hive Mind have put that Flat Earth thing behind us several centuries ago. In fact, we are hip on that Heliocentric Solar System thing as well. We have pictures to prove it as well. Pretty cool stuff, and comes in handy when figuring out moon shot ballistics, and lobbing space probes past the orbit of Neptune.

And some of us will even accept an ancient earth, ala the Old-Earth Creation model, which is supported good science and research much more well than the Duane Gish/Ken Ham Young Earth ideal.

Really, we 28% sheep are much more flexible than you may have been lead to believe. And as any good ol'boy farmer will tell you - wrapping a moist towel around your neck when driving a tractor in the field and wearing a wide brim hat will help avoid that reddening of the neck.

Incidentally, Carl... that 28-% remark you seem overly fond of might be a bit a tired old saw by now, considering that it used to be 90%. Which means that some of you ardent moonbats may have once been a part of the 90% Hive Mind, no?


@ Darth: From a practical standpoint, I must agree with you -- although I would like to think that if the wicked system of Islamic governance be removed, rather than destroying root and branch the people (Muslims) who are so easily agitated by it, those Muslims may begin to learn of another way to live.

This may be approached from two angles - with the "sword of the state" as is endorsed Biblically to uphold civil order, and to protect citizens from foreign aggression, and for the Christian, a sober consideration of how "the weapons of our warfare are not carnal (of the flesh) but or mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds" (2 Corinthians 10:4)

If I walk in the flesh - which as a sinner I am given to doing on more occassion than I would care for - I can (and have) easily advocated nuclear hellfire for much of Allah-land... fortunately, that decision is not mine to make. In a way, I am thankful for that, because committing to a decision that would destroy as many as 100 million lives in the course of an hour would be a terrible thing to be accluntable for, were it ultimately the wrong thing to do.

Admittedly, for the 1% of the big picture I think I can see, there is a ton that I do not, and better men than I can see it and act, and later they will give an account to thier Creator and mine.

However, Christ left room for Caesar (speaking particularly of the ancient Imperator Romanus, but also interpretively of all legal civil rule) to act with diligence to provide security for his people. If Caesar (or following the modern day extension - the US Government) fails to act in a diligent manner to provide a secure realm for its citizenry, then that Caesar shall also render an account before God on the Judgment Day.

The flip side of this is this: we have been compelled to go to war (and the moonbat colony Dan has growing here will refuse to see it in these terms, being much more willing to yield American sovereignty and to hate our great nation and Western Civilization with a passion matched only by the crazed mullahs in Tehran).

In defense of our civilization, much more our nation, it is only logical to me as one who has fought in a war, to employ every means as is available to:

- destroying enemy morale
- destroying or capturing enemy assets
- destroying or reducing enemy infrastructure
- and if need be, enemy population reduction insofar as it impacts on achieving the previous three conditions.

We are no strangers to being faced with such a horrible decision to make; but in the end, it was better that Dresden suffer its reduction to rubble and starvation than to see all of Europe (and possibly much more) plunged under the darkness and the jackbooted heels of Nazism for sevarl generations or more.

It was better that Hiroshima and Nagasaki offered up thier hundreds of thousands to prevent a truly horrific bloodletting on the order of millions of Japanese and American casualties that would have been _Operation_Downfall_ : the Allied invasion plans for Japan in 1946.


In today's case, we must be very careful to identify our targets. Is it Islam? Or state sponsors of terrorism? The GWOT remains armed against the somewhat nebulous term "terrorism".

One man's terrorist is another man's "Freedom Fighter" or "Holy Warrior" (mujhadeen). Instead, we need to clearly define our opponent (Islam in general, and the mullahcrats and half-baked sheikhs who rabble-rouse Muslim youths to acts of terror). On the domestic front, enemy propaganda and resident enemy aliens must be silenced, and enemy sympathists closely monitored. The MSM should likewise be monitored and encouraged to produce positive propaganda to motivate the populace in support of the war effort, i.e. reduced consumption of oil and gas, unnecessary travel, etc.

The problem I see stems from the pervasiveness of an evil doctrine that is opposed to any peace except the sacrifice of Hebrew and Christian lives before the altars of Allah.

Let us neither deceive ourselves, nor be deceived by the MSM or claims by CAIR that there is such a thing as "moderate Islam"; the only difference is that the "moderates" are not obeying the Koran as fully as the "extremists" are, or they are playing ignorant (al-Taqqiya, or dissimulation) of evil gems like Surah 9:3-5 and Haddiths that preach enmity against unbelievers (kufaar) or the non-Islamic world (Dar-al-Harb).

Allah, and his prophet, are nothing more than a particularly disgusting and outrageous set of "antichrists" who seek to steal God's glory and replace God with themselves as the center of human worship. Needless to say, they are doing a frighteningly good job of it.

In this, Islam is unique among the many religions of man - while most religions seek to construct a path to either knowing God or becoming gods, Islam seeks to make everything "submit" to Allah. Whether they want to, or not. The Koran says that there is "no compulsion in religion", but that is conveniently obfuscated and backpeddled by the Haddiths and other Koranic verses such as Surah 9:3 which commands Muslims to "announce painful punishments to those who disbelieve"... or this little gem:

"And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah" (Surah 8:39)

The root of Islam is forced conversion (dawaah) or murder; submission, or dhmmitude. And lies (Al-Taqqiya) and dissimulation all the way around. Surely this points to the work of Satan - the father of lies (John 8:44) - of whom Jesus said:

"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." (John 10:10, KJV)

Abundant Life... now that's a change in pace from the "sword of Islam".

True, Biblical Christianity (not the Ken Haggard variety) by contrast - is neither a religion of man's making, but is the result of God Himself reaching down to Man, and granting us a _choice_ to follow Him on this earth.

I see, the leftists attack/slander our military when the soldiers dare to ask for support, but squeel like pigs when we question their patriotism as a result. Typical of the fascist left. No wonder the leftists love the Islamo-Fascists. The IFs are the SS while the leftists are the regular army. The goal is the same as then-destroy America and the Jews.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Infolinks

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad