Keith Olbermann's alleged history of impotence seems to have caught up with him after he named popular conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin the worst person of the world on Thursday.
In response, Levin's listeners were in for a treat as he exposed Olbermann's ham-fisted, albeit limp-wrist-ed past with women while naming Olbermann Pervert of the World on Thursday night's broadcast. Links and audio available via MarkLevinFan. Olbermann Watch reported on the smack down, as well.
Levin's show reaches approximately four times as many people as Olbermanns, who still can't seem to beat O'Reilly re-runs.
Challenging Olbermann to respond, or even sue, Levin's listeners were left to wonder if any legal discovery process might not turn up an Olbermann in women's panties, as Levin played a musical salute to the failed sportscaster cum political hack - Walkin' Round In Women's Underwear. A review of Olbermann watch for Friday suggests, once again, Keith wasn't man enough to get it up for a second round.
Levin also requested men and women who might have had a sexual encounter more reminiscent of A Bridge Too Far, than Last Tango In Paris, with Olbermann to contact his show with the information for possible future broadcast. Always a classy guy, Levin stopped short of broadening the invitation to include house pets, horses, goats, hamsters or sheep.
In various reports floating around the Internet, one here, it's been alleged that Olbermann has a tendency to hide in the bathtub, under his desk, or run to the emergency room when he's afraid.
Given the No Mas response from Olbermann, who blathers nonsense no one hears to power, Levin fans are left to assume this is simply one more case of Keith not being able to cut the mustard, trying to save face by hanging limp and alone in the little Leftist echo chamber he has the nerve to call a show.
we don't even know if you've been to iraq dude, you're just some guy on a blog. I suspect a soldier in iraq would have better things to do than troll 3rd tier wingnut blogs for traitorous liberal commenters. So I think you're full of shit, and aren't a soldier and have never been to Iraq.
IF you did serve in Iraq, that doesn't make you an expert. One man being stationed in ONE area who likely doesn't speak much arabic is not an expert on Iraq much less the middle east in general. Your broad generalizations give this away, such as your inability to nuance beyond "terrorists"
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/02/04/why-they-hate-us-some-examples/
I hope you weren't one of these soldiers. And I hope these kind are the minority. Appalling.
Posted by: LOL | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:28 PM
Hey LOL (liberal Obnoxious Loser)
Personally, I don't give a damn what you think. I spent 22 years in the Army, around the world; Europe, the Far East, Mid-East, Stateside, Alaska, and a few places you probably never heard of. I spent several years as an Intelligence Officer, including interrogation in the Middle East and Far East. I retired recently, but I am still serving in a Retired Reserve capacity. I continue to work with our soldiers and am still involved. I do it because I love my country and the soldiers I have and continue to serve with.
You, on the other hand, are the standard hate-America, loathe the Military liberal socialist. You despise those who serve because our soldiers do things willingly that you would never do due to cowardice. You have no concern for you follow man and probably walk past a homeless man on the street, maybe even kick him, but you will accuse conservatives of this. You probably scream about the genocide in Rwanda and Darfur, but you personally would never lift a finger to help them other than protest, because THAT would be something to further attempt to embarrass America. You are a consistently nasty, vile person who would cuss out someone rather than pray for them. You are against the death penalty for a mass murderer, but you would happily slice up and unborn baby and call it choice.
Have I described you accurately? I bet I have. So with that, I will pray for you; although I will probably be wasting my breath…
Posted by: Jebster | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:50 PM
sure sure
a retired military officer trolling riehl's blog for liberals to bash. I believe it.
Don't you have an army to go help?
Isn't it ironic that yours is the most hate-filled post in teh thread, while you project that ugliness on to everyone else? Get a clue buddy, nobody buys your soldier story
Posted by: LOL | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:59 PM
>>How do you know it's not true? Are you a soldier? Have you EVER served? Have you talked to real soldiers? Are I in contact with real soldiers regularly?
There’s these people called reporters and they talk to people like soldiers, there are also many polls that support me. Oh and there’s logic and reason.
>>I am.
I don’t think you are, I think you’re some guy on a website spouting tired, debunked talking points.
>>What you see are the minority of them touting by the press to make American look bad.
Well they’re doing a crappy job; America looks fine it’s the 30% that still supports Bush’s asinine policies that look bad. That’s you Sparky, you are what’s wrong with America. Thank gawd you’re a minority.
>>Sure there is some frustration over extensions and stop-loss, but your claim about the majority is false.
No, not it’s not. The people who signed up for National Guard duty did not sign up for a wild goose chase to get Bush re-elected and themselves killed in civil war.
>>>Left-wing talking points. The terrorists are fighting to destroy any freedom from taking hold in an Arab country in the ME.
Really? Considering that there is no freedom in any Arab country they’re doing a pretty good job. No freedom in Saudi Arabia but I’m sure your Dear Leader brings that up every time they sleep over at Crawford.
So that’s what the war was about? Bringing freedom to Iraq? Well how’s that working out? So far only for Iran. Heckuvajob Bushie!
>>But again, you have never been there and only read the propaganda delivered by the likes of the NY slimes.
Like Judith Miller? You don’t even know what the hell you’re talking about. The American media repeated every line of bullshit fed to them by your Dear Leader. The NYT was one of the biggest supporters of the invasion.
>>Additionally, explain the tons of uranium, including the 1.77 tons of enriched uranium were found.
How very odd that the Bush administration and the Pentagon have said no such thing! You’d think they’d want people to know but they both said that no WMD were found. I think one of you is full of shit on this matter.
>Explain the 500 chemical rounds we found.
Sure, they were left over from the 1990’s rotten and useless, hey just like Bush!
>>Explains how they used WMDs, chemical weapons against the Kurds and against the Iranian.
They had those weapons and they used them with America’s approval. They then stopped making them after the first Gulf War and the remaining stocks become rotten and useless.
>Explain the yellowcake they DID get that we found in the debris FROM Iraq.
Daarrr they had a nuclear reactor, Israel (gawd bless ‘em) blew it up doing the world a favor. That debris was 20 years old. About twice as old as you are I suspect.
>If your hero Saddam
Ah there yes Saddam was my hero, this is all you can do isn’t it? The facts and reality aren’t on your side so you need to lie and smear. Liberals (like Amnesty International) were against Saddam when Rumsfeld YOUR HERO was shaking his hand. So do shut up about that huh Sparky?
>>did NOT have WMDs, or believe he had WMDs, then why did he not prove it in accordance with the UN resolutions?
Oh dear, the bad man was expected to play nice and honest? Spare me. There were inspectors but they were ordered out by your Dear Leader so he could have his war.
>>Yes, it does matter what the liberal flip=floppers said. You cannot just ignore the truth you do not like. About the WMD's, see above.
You do understand the difference between words and actions yeah? What they said doesn’t come close to what Bush did. He invaded and got thousands killed for nothing.
>>Oh, is THAT left-wingnut talking point #36 or #360? During the Iran hostage crisis we supported Saddam against Iran.
So you’re cool with the Kurds being gassed because Iranians held some Americans? I don’t see the connection myself but I have a brain.
>>Occasionally, friends do become enemies
.
So Saddam was cool but then later he wasn’t? Even though he’s been doing the exact same mass murdering thing? Do you even know how he came to power?
>>Even after a handshake. I for one, do care for our fellow man, even if you don't.
Ahahahahah! Lies. You’re a jingo spouting conniver whose morality shifts like the sand. Whatever position supports Dear Leader.
>Whether of not Kuwait had oil, I would have supported pushing him out...
If they didn’t’ have oil you wouldn’t know where they were. So when Indonesia invaded East Timor you were ready to go to war there? Do you know where these places are? They don’t have oil so I doubt it.
>>I was there too.
It’s funny the real soldiers I meet online are usually very reluctant to talk about it, the fakes and liars… it’s usually the first thing they say.
>>There ya go again, more left-wingnut talking point. Yup, Americans are filling up mass graves.
And I didn’t say that, but again these sorts of tricks are all you have because you don’t have the truth or reality. And you certainly can’t answer the point that the invasion hasn’t improved a thing in Iraq, just made it worse.
And blah blah blah, you don’t know what you’re talking about, just a bunch of recycled dittohead crap.
Fact: The invasion of Iraq was a terrible mistake and now only a handful of dead-ender GOP types who put Party before Country are defending it. Because you’d rather “win” than be right. You’re like the assholes that spent the 70s insisting that Nixon was framed, Vietnam winnable and Disco not dead.
End of story.
Posted by: salvage | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:59 PM
Talk about haterd...
But personally, as I said, I don't care what you think. We know who and what you are.
Posted by: Jebster | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 06:10 PM
"Fact: The invasion of Iraq was a terrible mistake and now only a handful of dead-ender GOP types who put Party before Country are defending it. Because you’d rather “win” than be right. You’re like the assholes that spent the 70s insisting that Nixon was framed, Vietnam winnable and Disco not dead."
Fact: The invasion was NOT a mistake, no matter what facts you want to ignore, you project your psychosis on the right; you see, we believe in American first, not party as the left has proven. I do not believe Nixon was framed, niether was Clinton, we did win Vietnam, the politicians lost the peace...thank you Ted Kenedy; and thank God disco IS dead.
Posted by: Jebster | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 06:13 PM
Do you kiss your Mommy with that mouth Salvage?
Posted by: Earnhardt | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 06:33 PM
I have no valid arguement!
Posted by: salvage | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 06:37 PM
">>Additionally, explain the tons of uranium, including the 1.77 tons of enriched uranium were found.
How very odd that the Bush administration and the Pentagon have said no such thing! You’d think they’d want people to know but they both said that no WMD were found. I think one of you is full of shit on this matter."
Hmmm, full of it you say...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3872201.stm
There's a lot more about it, but you should be able to find more if you had the stomach for the truth.
Posted by: Jebster | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 06:41 PM
Right, did you read the whole article?
The 1,000 "sources" evacuated in the Iraqi operation included a "huge range" of radioactive items used for medical purposes and industrial purposes, a spokesman for the Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration told AP news agency.
So how exactly was Saddam going to use X-Ray machines to destroy America? You’re such whiney bitches, begging to be lied to. “Oh please Dear Leader, just give us something! Anything that we can pretend is true so we don’t have to face up to the fact that we were suckered!” So Bush scoops up a bunch of waste and you’re all “Yeah! Good thing we sent 3,000+ soldiers to die so Saddam can’t have radioactive garbage!”
If terrorists want to drop a dirty bomb (which by the way would do very little nuclear damage, it’d be fools like you running around in a pants wetting panic that would do the most harm) they can get all the materials state-side.
Let’s end this “weapons of mass destruction” bullshit right here and now.
Now, look, I -- part of the reason we went into Iraq: was -- the main reason we went into Iraq: at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction.
GW Bush August 21, 2006
And before you start to gibber about “capacity” I have the capacity to have sex with the Rockettes but I doubt it’s going to happen. And last time I checked Bush wasn’t talking about “capacity” in all his prewar speeches, he was talking about stockpiles and mobile bioweapons labs and nuclear weapons.
WASHINGTON - The comprehensive 15-month search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has concluded that the only chemical or biological agents that Saddam Hussein's regime was working on before last year's invasion were small quantities of poisons, most likely for use in assassinations.
A draft of the Iraq Survey Group's final report circulating in Washington found no sign of the alleged illegal stockpiles that the US and Britain presented as the justification for going to war, nor did it find any evidence of efforts to reconstitute Iraq's nuclear weapons programme.
Official report: NO WMD.
The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active. Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
White House, Pentagon, CIA: NO WMD.
Get it through your thick wingnut skull. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to be found. Real soldiers were sent to Iraq and died for a non-existent threat.
You were lied to and you can’t handle it so you pretend you weren’t lied to.
That’s pretty pathetic.
Posted by: salvage | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 08:13 AM
No Salvage, what is pathetic is the FACT that you have your head that far up your nevermind and are still able to type. I could add additional information but it is blatantly obvious that you just don't want to see things for what they are. Well, it's like the old saying... Ignorance is bliss. Enjoy it you blissful idiot!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 10:18 AM
You can add additional information?
No, no you couldn't because there is no additional information.
I'll say it again for the very slow.
There.were.no.WMD.in.Iraq.
Bush, the Pentagon, the CIA and anyone and everyone with a brain larger than a gnat's reproductive organ agree.
None.
Posted by: salvage | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 10:22 AM
Look JERK, when, not if, we get hit again it is JERKS like you that I will be pointing fingers at. Wanna take a geuss as to which one I'm gonna point? I could care less if you lib-tards want to do yourselves in. Just don't take the rest of us with you. Got that JERK? Have a nice day and remember, if you don't stop doing that, you'll go blind!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 11:55 AM
By the way, you Neville Chamberlain types ain't worth the time of day! Don't look me up when the muzzies come knocking at your door! FYNAITH! And that last one weren't a typo. Figure it out brianiac! After all, you are so danged smart!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 12:03 PM
Still looking up FYNAITH JERK?
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 12:41 PM
Ya know what's funny about Neville Chamberlain and appeasement? While he was waving his treaty around there were Nazi rallies going on in Madison Square Garden. Part of the reason why the U.S. wasn't keen on the war “over there” was lots of Americans liked that Hitler guy. It’s funny how you forget that the British (along with us Canadians) went after the Nazis right away, America sat on her giant ass until it got hit. So you might want to think about that next time you go on an “appeasement” jag.
And of course America will get hit again. Instead of spending the last four years going after Al Qeada your Dear Leader was busy invading Iraq and wasting all kinds of resources that could have gone into getting bin Laden and his buddies.
I know, I know America is now safe from Saddam with his no WMD and his crap army that was curb stomped in three weeks. Boy! That’s a relief! Saddam could have… well sent nasty emails or ordered pizzas to the White House.
So no Sparky, when America does get hit again it will be a failure of leadership, the leadership that you continue to blindly follow.
And of course you’ll blame everyone else because to blame Bush (the guy whose y’know job it is to prevent that sort of thing?) would be to admit your own stupidity and you’re too stupid to do that.
I don’t know what “FYNAITH!” means but I don’t speak retard, can you please translate? You seem totally fluent.
Posted by: salvage | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 02:00 PM
Sorry, my redneck to lib-tard translator is broken and I'm done wasting my time with you you JERK!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 03:07 PM
Ah, "jebster"? Alaska IS "stateside. Thought you'd like to know. Texas too these days.
Posted by: boring old git | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 03:20 PM
By the way salvage, I have absolutely no tolerance for the galactically friggin' mentally challenged types! You do so exude the typical elitist mentality! FYNAITH!
Posted by: Earhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 03:22 PM
This one seems to be more your speed salvage! You too boring old git! Enjoy lib-tards! Just remember, if'n ya don't stop doing that, you'll go blind! My bad! I forgot you were!
From: http://michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=204
Wednesday, January 10th, 2007
Dear Mr. President: Send Even MORE Troops (and you go, too!) ...from Michael Moore
Dear Mr. President,
Thanks for your address to the nation. It's good to know you still want to talk to us after how we behaved in November.
Listen, can I be frank? Sending in 20,000 more troops just ain't gonna do the job. That will only bring the troop level back up to what it was last year. And we were losing the war last year! We've already had over a million troops serve some time in Iraq since 2003. Another few thousand is simply not enough to find those weapons of mass destruction! Er, I mean... bringing those responsible for 9/11 to justice! Um, scratch that. Try this -- BRING DEMOCRACY TO THE MIDDLE EAST! YES!!!
You've got to show some courage, dude! You've got to win this one! C'mon, you got Saddam! You hung 'im high! I loved watching the video of that -- just like the old wild west! The bad guy wore black! The hangmen were as crazy as the hangee! Lynch mobs rule!!!
Look, I have to admit I feel very sorry for the predicament you're in. As Ricky Bobby said, "If you're not first, you're last." And you being humiliated in front of the whole world does NONE of us Americans any good.
Sir, listen to me. You have to send in MILLIONS of troops to Iraq, not thousands! The only way to lick this thing now is to flood Iraq with millions of us! I know that you're out of combat-ready soldiers -- so you have to look elsewhere! The only way you are going to beat a nation of 27 million -- Iraq -- is to send in at least 28 million! Here's how it would work:
The first 27 million Americans go in and kill one Iraqi each. That will quickly take care of any insurgency. The other one million of us will stay and rebuild the country. Simple.
Now, I know you're saying, where will I find 28 million Americans to go to Iraq? Here are some suggestions:
1. More than 62,000,000 Americans voted for you in the last election (the one that took place a year and half into a war we already knew we were losing). I am confident that at least a third of them would want to put their body where their vote was and sign up to volunteer. I know many of these people and, while we may disagree politically, I know that they don't believe someone else should have to go and fight their fight for them -- while they hide here in America.
2. Start a "Kill an Iraqi" Meet-Up group in cities across the country. I know this idea is so early-21st century, but I once went to a Lou Dobbs Meet-Up and, I swear, some of the best ideas happen after the third mojito. I'm sure you'll get another five million or so enlistees from this effort.
3. Send over all members of the mainstream media. After all, they were your collaborators in bringing us this war -- and many of them are already trained from having been "embedded!" If that doesn't bring the total to 28 million, then draft all viewers of the FOX News channel.
Mr. Bush, do not give up! Now is not the time to pull your punch! Don't be a weenie by sending in a few over-tired troops. Get your people behind you and YOU lead them in like a true commander in chief! Leave no conservative behind! Full speed ahead!
We promise to write. Go get 'em W!
Yours,
Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com
www.michaelmoore.com
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 03:38 PM
Lookie there! I can copy/paste lib-tard comments too!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 03:41 PM
>and I'm done wasting my time with you you JERK!
Um... you then posted a bunch of more stuff at me...
Good gravy! You don't even understand your own posts!
What is your obsession with masturbation anyway? You keep on bringing it up. If you're looking for pointers may I suggest you try Google? It's a pretty simple act but I'm thinking that with out detailed instructions probably not simple enough for you.
And as for Michael Moore, I'm not sure what the point of that was but interesting fact, more Americans now agree with him when it comes to Iraq than you.
That must sting huh? To confess I've stopped being a Moore fan since the stunt he pulled with the animated short in Bowling for Columbine, I don't think he's quite as honest as he thinks he is.
But ya know what? He's still worth a thousand of you.
Oh and I Googled FYNAITH... You're calling me a riderless dragon?
http://www.geocities.com/wuweyr/records/fynaith.html
Ow. That hurts.
Well you're a... a... POOKA!
Nah, just kidding, you're a regular, run of the mill retard. I doubt you could be anything cool like a Pooka.
Posted by: salvage | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 04:39 PM
>By the way salvage, I have absolutely no tolerance for the galactically friggin' mentally challenged types!
Wow, it must be hard to live with yourself. How do you do it?
>You do so exude the typical elitist mentality! FYNAITH!
Heh, "elitist" I know that word in Retard, it means "Someone who's smarter than me BUT I COULD KICK HIS FAGGY ASS!"
Posted by: salvage | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 04:42 PM
Bingo! Thank you for confirming what I already knew you 1960's retread! Enjoy your dope DOPE!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 04:52 PM
And another thing... you weren't even close on FYNAITH! Try again brainiac!
Posted by: Earhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 04:55 PM
I done told ya salvage, it's up to you to figure it out. After all, you know so danged much! Educate me you elitist JERK!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 04:57 PM
Still trying to Google FYNAITH? Hint: Pull your head out of your backside and THINK!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 05:09 PM
Here's something that will surely get your rocks off salvage! http://www.alfranken.com/ Enjoy!
Posted by: Earnhardt | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 05:16 PM