Olbermann Left Limp After On Air Smack Down

Keith Olbermann's alleged history of impotence seems to have caught up with him after he named popular conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin the worst person of the world on Thursday.

In response, Levin's listeners were in for a treat as he exposed Olbermann's ham-fisted, albeit limp-wrist-ed past with women while naming Olbermann Pervert of the World on Thursday night's broadcast. Links and audio available via MarkLevinFan. Olbermann Watch reported on the smack down, as well.

Levin's show reaches approximately four times as many people as Olbermanns, who still can't seem to beat O'Reilly re-runs.

Challenging Olbermann to respond, or even sue, Levin's listeners were left to wonder if any legal discovery process might not turn up an Olbermann in women's panties, as Levin played a musical salute to the failed sportscaster cum political hack - Walkin' Round In Women's Underwear. A review of Olbermann watch for Friday suggests, once again, Keith wasn't man enough to get it up for a second round.

Levin also requested men and women who might have had a sexual encounter more reminiscent of A Bridge Too Far, than Last Tango In Paris, with Olbermann to contact his show with the information for possible future broadcast. Always a classy guy, Levin stopped short of broadening the invitation to include house pets, horses, goats, hamsters or sheep.

In various reports floating around the Internet, one here, it's been alleged that Olbermann has a tendency to hide in the bathtub, under his desk, or run to the emergency room when he's afraid.

Given the No Mas response from Olbermann, who blathers nonsense no one hears to power, Levin fans are left to assume this is simply one more case of Keith not being able to cut the mustard, trying to save face by hanging limp and alone in the little Leftist echo chamber he has the nerve to call a show.

Comments

[Darth Malice]

Olberman is a liberal limp-wristed pansie.He is a fine example of Democrats.

[anon.]

One could magnify your brain 10,000 times and still be able to throw it down the throat of a gnat and it would rattle like a BB in a box car!

[Dan Riehl]

One could

Keith? ; )

[Oregonian]

It might not be the smartest move for you to call other guys "limp wristed," Dan.

The pot calling the kettle black and all that...

[The Liberal Avenger]

This post really says everything there is to say about Dan Riehl. Petty, boorish, nasty, vindictive, hateful, mean. I'm glad that Dan is around to set an example for young conservatives everywhere. Thank you, Dan!

[Phoenix]

Boys, I am here to tell you that Dan is anything but limp wristed.

Get over it.

As for this 'petty' post on Olbermann, you do know there is a blog out there specifically to trash Olbermann's every utterance? Check it out. It live-blogs his evening shows and then has plenty of lovely commentary. It's an industry, actually.

You two might enjoy Daily Pundit blog. They are quite conservative, and I know they would welcome your perspicacious input. Go try it. :}

[Darth Malice]

Olberman is Edwards without the fake southern accent.

[Andrez]

Yeah, homosexuality runs in families. I wonder how big Dan's closet is??

[Legalize]

"Boys, I am here to tell you that Dan is anything but limp wristed."

Do you guys watch Top Gun together on rainy Sunday Afternoons? - Not that there's anything wrong wit that.

[Artie]

Hahahaha - sounds like Phoenix and Dan have a brokeback thing going. Two proud patriots that cant keep their hands off each other. Its enough to keep Drudge up at night.

[scarshapedstar]

Glass house, meet stone...

[Darth Malice]

Artie,don't you have candy to steal from a baby?

[Oregonian]

"Do you guys watch Top Gun together on rainy Sunday Afternoons?"

I think they listen to old Limbaugh tapes and fantasize about the cigar.

[MarkLevinFan]

Excellent post, Dan! I see you’ve gotten the Libs all worked up in a tizzy! LOL!

[templar knight]

You limp-brained liberals still haven't answered my question, or responded to my proposal on global warming. Are you scared? Cat got your pinkie? Or are all of you nothing but hot air? Not truly concerned about Mother Earth are you? You don't even believe your own propaganda, do you?

[Darth Malice]

Knight glad your here....Blasting liberals is work that never ends!

[Carl]

Here's a thought, brave crusader. No one (other than the fellow 28%ers)gives a rats ass about you, your leader or what either of you have to say. Irrelevance, get used to it.

[Darth Malice]

Liberals are irrelevent....muzzies are irrelevent...Rinos are irrelevent.

[Earnhardt]

Overbite is a Pansycrat. Plain and simple. Limp wristed and limp, well... you know the story Mr. Thumbtack!

[Jebster]

Another fine smackdown of the man hung like a thumbtack. Is Overbite still hiding under his desk?!?

[Carl]

Hung like a thumbtack? You closeted brokeback cons are showing your true (rainbow) colors today. I can see why you like Drudge so much.

[scarshapedstar]

Templar, you're evidently unaware of the hundreds of animal behavioral studies that conclusively demonstrate homosexuality to be anything but an exclusively human phenomenon.

Forgive us if we're not quick to endorse your theories on climatology.

[scarshapedstar]

By the way, your theory is... how to put this... wrong in every way imaginable. I think the gist of what you were getting at is that there needs to be fewer people in general, and especially in developed countries, which is pretty hard to argue with, but sounds awfully Anti-Life.

Oh, also, wanna see a magic trick? Close off our borders and watch in amazement as the temperatures continue to rise. Gee, it's almost as if China's in the middle of an economic explosion....

...well, I still blame the Mexicans!

[Legalize]

It's always amusing to me that creepy cons are so obsessed with the genitals (and cigars)and general sex-lives of their male political detractos, as well as with overall "gay-ness." It's fascinating because this obsession rarely has to do with anything relative to any present scenario, yet they can't stop thinking about it and they can't stop talking about it.

"I am a deceiver and a liar. The fact is I am guilty of sexual immorality. There is a part of my life that is so repulsive and dark that I've been warring against it all of my adult life." - Ted Haggard. I wonder how close to home Haggard's words hit with some of the aforementioned cons.

[Earnhardt]

Carl, are your panties in a wad there or are you just excited to see Overbite?

[scarshapedstar]

Huh. I wanted to run a background check on this blog, you know, since it's obviously completely true, and the author is exactly who she says she is... but it seems the proprietor made some terrible mistake and accidentally made it invite-only! I mean, I know there's no reason why any well-meaning conservative would EVER want to defeat the self-correcting power of the blogosphere.

Here's hoping she fixes this whoopsy-daisy ASAP... maybe I'll skip the breath-holding just this once, though.

[Jebster]

Carl, you really have an issue with the "Brokeback" thing. Are you sure you aren't as limp as "The Impotent One"? Are you a San Francisco native, maybe a little "light in the loafers" yourself? Hmmmm...

[salvage]

AHAHAAHAHA!

Oh your god Dan! Just when I think you can't get sadder your pull out more clowns from your car of bottomless retardation.

A woman slept with Keith now he won't speak to her! HE'S THE WORSE GUY EVER!!! Don't listen to what he says about Dear Leader! Chicks don't like him!!!

The best part is you still have no idea what a joke you are Dan.

[LOL]

this post reveals more about dan's own insecurities than anything to do with olberman

[SalvageLovesOverbite]

Oh look eveyone...more boys who fantasize about getting it on with Overbite!! Salvage, have you emailed overbite yet for a date? So, sodomy...YES OR NO?!?

[SalvageIsAWeinerLover]

Yes or no on the sodomy?

[TheSpartan]

I'm supposed to care how Olbermann is in bed? I don't give a flying you know what about his sex life as long as he isn't hurting anyone. Of course maybe Dan can provide us with some references in that area.

[Maurice]

Don't tease salvage like that! He sounds nice! Wonder if he's single? (I hope)

[Brucie]

No maurice, you beast, I'll fight you for his scrawny little butt.

[salvage]

Yes, I'm so gay in love with KO! I want to gay marry him and have gay babies!

Iszat the best you can do? A slight variation of "FFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGG! Yer a Faaaaaaaaaag!!!!"?

I bet you're Dan's wittiest fan.

And I like your 12 minute later self-follow-up, are you sitting there hitting refresh over and over again?

[Salvage's Dad]

Salvage, stop that right now and go clean up the stains in the basement. Or I will have to spank you again. But you like that.

[Carl]

San Francisco native??? Good lord, sheep, there are millions of people from SF - including my wife. And by impotent one, I assume you mean Rush, who was busted with a whole lot of Viagra on is way back from the DR. You 28%ers are amazing. Too bad the whole lot of you can't go to Iraq and get yourselves liberated.

[Jebster]

Some of us HAVE been there Carl. Have you ever served? If not, in the liberal mindset, you have no right to speak.

[surrendercrats]

The former leader of the hard lefties is a rapist yet they villified Foley for writing about sex.
Their former leader is a coke-head yet they accuse Bush of the same while ignoring the impeached former president's own former bodyguards' accounts of 42's snort fettish. And their newest cheerleader is pompous (without reason) and gullible galloot who's viewership is larger on YouTube than real life.

[salvage]

No Jebster, the "chickenhawk" meme is for those who jump up and down screaming that Iraq is the "central front on the war on terror and OMG Saddam is going to kill us all!!" but don't want to, y'know, actually put their ass on the line to fight this vital war. Won't even suggest a draft so guys like you don't have to go on three or four tours. See they flip-flop on the vitality of the Iraq invasion depending on if they're trying to cover a point or their ass.

I find it weird that doesn't bother you.

[Maurice]

So, salvage, a "chicken-chicken" must be a wimp that never served and wants to pull out! You don't want to pull out, do you big boy?

[Jebster]

Salvage, I have no problem whatsoever going back three and four times; most of us soldiers don't mind. We understand what is at stake here. We understand that we have to take the fight to the enemy, or they will bring it here. They have said as much. Sure, there have been many politicians who have flip-flopped on the war; Hillary comes to mind. So does John Kerry.

So, do you think we should have left Saddam in power to continue filling those mass graves? Oh, yeah, there are mass graves; I have seen them. There were torture rooms; I have seen them.

[Carl]

No, I've never served. However, I went to college and business school and, given that I am in the 35% tax bracket, have done my fair share.

[Maurice]

Carol, you never served? Are you a chicken-chicken, too?

[JT]

Is this the famed civility of the right I keep hearing about?

[Carl's wife]

Carl's so fat, I have to grease a door frame and hold a Twinkie on the other side to get him through to come to bed.

(That's why he never served. He likes being served.)

[salvage]

> I have no problem whatsoever going back three and four times; most of us soldiers don't mind.

That simply is not true. I’m sure there is a minority that feels that way but they are a minority to be sure. Most soliders are quite upset over the stop-loss orders. The National Guard are.

>We understand what is at stake here. We understand that we have to take the fight to the enemy, or they will bring it here.

Again that simply is not true. The various insurgent / terrorists factions in Iraq are fighting to figure out who the next Saddam is going to be or Ayatollah depending on the factions’ flavor. You think they’re going to build themselves a fleet of bombers and battleships and come on over here?

Do you really think a 9/11 style sleeper cell is going to abandon their plans in the States to go to Iraq? How does that make any sense?

At any rate the “flypaper” strategy, even if it worked, would be a monstrous war crime.

No, you were supposedly sent to Iraq to stop Saddam’s WMD. Funny how that doesn’t get much mention anymore. Wonder why? I bet you talked of nothing but WMD three years ago.

> They have said as much. Sure, there have been many politicians who have flip-flopped on the war; Hillary comes to mind. So does John Kerry.

Yup, wingnut boilerplate #36; please spare me the list of quotes, it doesn’t matter who said what, Bush invaded and there were no WMD. End of story. But I love how the Democrats and the UN gets props from you, do you take their word on everything or just when it’s convenient?

>So, do you think we should have left Saddam in power to continue filling those mass graves?

Yeah? No shit. Amnesty International went on and on about them while Donald Rumsfeld was shaking the Butcher of Bagdad’s claw on behalf of the American people. I bet you were hopping mad about that at the time huh? I bet you talked of nothing but liberating Iraq from Saddam all your life.

Perhaps not, again weird that Iraq’s human rights only became an issue when Saddam started fucking with the oil supply. Even funnier considering Kuwait is a dictatorship that has an abysmal human rights record as well. We must save the bad dictatorship from the worse one! If they didn't have oil we wouldn't be having this chat so please drop the concern for fellow man spiel, it's simply not true. We (and I'm including myself here) love oil and we let people live and die in misery to get it cheap.

>Oh, yeah, there are mass graves; I have seen them. There were torture rooms; I have seen them.

Guess what? Go back to Iraq and you can still see the mass graves, you can still see the torture rooms. Go to Saudi Arabia, go to Pakistan, go to Kazakhstan and other “allies” and you can see more. This selective outrage holds no water I’m afraid as Iraq has not been made safer for the Iraqis. They’re still being murdered only instead of one source of misery there are dozens.

Solving a problem by changing the source of the problem is not solving the problem.
Bush has killed thousands and spent billions to make the Middle East a more dangerous place.

At this point anyone who cheerleads this madness (thankfully a minority) either does not understand the situation or is a paid shill.

[Jebster]

> I have no problem whatsoever going back three and four times; most of us soldiers don't mind.

That simply is not true. I’m sure there is a minority that feels that way but they are a minority to be sure. Most soliders are quite upset over the stop-loss orders. The National Guard are.

>>How do you know it's not true? Are you a soldier? Have you EVER served? Have you talked to real soldiers? Are I in contact with real soldiers regularly? I am. What you see are the minority of them touting by the press to make American look bad. Sure there is some frustration over extensions and stop-loss, but your claim about the majority is false.

>We understand what is at stake here. We understand that we have to take the fight to the enemy, or they will bring it here.

Again that simply is not true. The various insurgent / terrorists factions in Iraq are fighting to figure out who the next Saddam is going to be or Ayatollah depending on the factions’ flavor. You think they’re going to build themselves a fleet of bombers and battleships and come on over here?

Do you really think a 9/11 style sleeper cell is going to abandon their plans in the States to go to Iraq? How does that make any sense?

At any rate the “flypaper” strategy, even if it worked, would be a monstrous war crime.

No, you were supposedly sent to Iraq to stop Saddam’s WMD. Funny how that doesn’t get much mention anymore. Wonder why? I bet you talked of nothing but WMD three years ago.

>>Left-wing talking points. The terrorists are fighting to destroy any freedom from taking hold in an Arab country in the ME. But again, you have never been there and only read the propaganda delivered by the likes of the NY slimes. Additionally, explain the tons of uranium, including the 1.77 tons of enriched uranium were found. Explain the 500 chemical rounds we found. Explains how they used WMDs, chemical weapons against the Kurds and against the Iranian. Explain the yellowcake they DID get that we found in the debris FROM Iraq. If your hero Saddam did NOT have WMDs, or believe he had WMDs, then why did he not prove it in accordance with the UN resolutions?

> They have said as much. Sure, there have been many politicians who have flip-flopped on the war; Hillary comes to mind. So does John Kerry.

Yup, wingnut boilerplate #36; please spare me the list of quotes, it doesn’t matter who said what, Bush invaded and there were no WMD. End of story. But I love how the Democrats and the UN gets props from you, do you take their word on everything or just when it’s convenient?

>>Yes, it does matter what the liberal flip=floppers said. You cannot just ignore the truth you do not like. About the WMD's, see above.

>So, do you think we should have left Saddam in power to continue filling those mass graves?

Yeah? No shit. Amnesty International went on and on about them while Donald Rumsfeld was shaking the Butcher of Bagdad’s claw on behalf of the American people. I bet you were hopping mad about that at the time huh? I bet you talked of nothing but liberating Iraq from Saddam all your life.

Perhaps not, again weird that Iraq’s human rights only became an issue when Saddam started fucking with the oil supply. Even funnier considering Kuwait is a dictatorship that has an abysmal human rights record as well. We must save the bad dictatorship from the worse one! If they didn't have oil we wouldn't be having this chat so please drop the concern for fellow man spiel, it's simply not true. We (and I'm including myself here) love oil and we let people live and die in misery to get it cheap.

>>Oh, is THAT left-wingnut talking point #36 or #360? During the Iran hostage crisis we supported Saddam against Iran. Occasionally, friends do become enemies. Even after a handshake. I for one, do care for our fellow man, even if you don't. Whether of not Kuwait had oil, I would have supported pushing him out...I was there too.

>Oh, yeah, there are mass graves; I have seen them. There were torture rooms; I have seen them.

Guess what? Go back to Iraq and you can still see the mass graves, you can still see the torture rooms. Go to Saudi Arabia, go to Pakistan, go to Kazakhstan and other “allies” and you can see more. This selective outrage holds no water I’m afraid as Iraq has not been made safer for the Iraqis. They’re still being murdered only instead of one source of misery there are dozens.

Solving a problem by changing the source of the problem is not solving the problem.
Bush has killed thousands and spent billions to make the Middle East a more dangerous place.

At this point anyone who cheerleads this madness (thankfully a minority) either does not understand the situation or is a paid shill.

>>There ya go again, more left-wingnut talking point. Yup, Americans are filling up mass graves. You really are a poltroon, aren't you? Do we and should we interogate aggressively, including water boarding and other things that might make you poor little tummy queasy? Hell yeah. I have no problem with interrogating a captured terrorist who is not covered by the Geneva Conventions and someone who has murdered innocent women and children. You ever had to clean up those little body parts after a terrorist car bomb? Have you ever had to comfort a little girl after she had been tortured and raped by these terrorist animals and then shot off her toes...all to get at the parents...before doing the same to the parents? With you libs, THAT is the kind off stuff we WILL see here in America. You see, you anti-American bastards don't get it. These people want us dead. They do not care if you are liberal or conservative, black or white, gay or straight, man or woman...they want us dead because we are not muslim, we are Americans who believe in freedom, and they don't. Your attitude and your party's policies WILL get more Americans killed. You are just too stupid and your hatred for America is too great for you to understand it.

So, to use the liberal argument, just because you might understand it; until you have served in the Military and fought against the terrorists, until you have seen the death and destruction FIRST HAND, until you have one of these terrorists try to kill you or your buddy, you have no right and no experience to criticize those of use who have been there; you have no right no intelligence to criticize the plan or the operations. But then again, that is the lib-tard argument...

[Jebster]

> I have no problem whatsoever going back three and four times; most of us soldiers don't mind.

That simply is not true. I’m sure there is a minority that feels that way but they are a minority to be sure. Most soliders are quite upset over the stop-loss orders. The National Guard are.

>>How do you know it's not true? Are you a soldier? Have you EVER served? Have you talked to real soldiers? Are YOU in contact with real soldiers regularly? I am. What you see are the minority of them touting by the press to make American look bad. Sure there is some frustration over extensions and stop-loss, but your claim about the majority is false.

>We understand what is at stake here. We understand that we have to take the fight to the enemy, or they will bring it here.

Again that simply is not true. The various insurgent / terrorists factions in Iraq are fighting to figure out who the next Saddam is going to be or Ayatollah depending on the factions’ flavor. You think they’re going to build themselves a fleet of bombers and battleships and come on over here?

Do you really think a 9/11 style sleeper cell is going to abandon their plans in the States to go to Iraq? How does that make any sense?

At any rate the “flypaper” strategy, even if it worked, would be a monstrous war crime.

No, you were supposedly sent to Iraq to stop Saddam’s WMD. Funny how that doesn’t get much mention anymore. Wonder why? I bet you talked of nothing but WMD three years ago.

>>Left-wing talking points. The terrorists are fighting to destroy any freedom from taking hold in an Arab country in the ME. But again, you have never been there and only read the propaganda delivered by the likes of the NY slimes. Additionally, explain the tons of uranium, including the 1.77 tons of enriched uranium were found. Explain the 500 chemical rounds we found. Explains how they used WMDs, chemical weapons against the Kurds and against the Iranian. Explain the yellowcake they DID get that we found in the debris FROM Iraq. If your hero Saddam did NOT have WMDs, or believe he had WMDs, then why did he not prove it in accordance with the UN resolutions?

> They have said as much. Sure, there have been many politicians who have flip-flopped on the war; Hillary comes to mind. So does John Kerry.

Yup, wingnut boilerplate #36; please spare me the list of quotes, it doesn’t matter who said what, Bush invaded and there were no WMD. End of story. But I love how the Democrats and the UN gets props from you, do you take their word on everything or just when it’s convenient?

>>Yes, it does matter what the liberal flip=floppers said. You cannot just ignore the truth you do not like. About the WMD's, see above.

>So, do you think we should have left Saddam in power to continue filling those mass graves?

Yeah? No shit. Amnesty International went on and on about them while Donald Rumsfeld was shaking the Butcher of Bagdad’s claw on behalf of the American people. I bet you were hopping mad about that at the time huh? I bet you talked of nothing but liberating Iraq from Saddam all your life.

Perhaps not, again weird that Iraq’s human rights only became an issue when Saddam started fucking with the oil supply. Even funnier considering Kuwait is a dictatorship that has an abysmal human rights record as well. We must save the bad dictatorship from the worse one! If they didn't have oil we wouldn't be having this chat so please drop the concern for fellow man spiel, it's simply not true. We (and I'm including myself here) love oil and we let people live and die in misery to get it cheap.

>>Oh, is THAT left-wingnut talking point #36 or #360? During the Iran hostage crisis we supported Saddam against Iran. Occasionally, friends do become enemies. Even after a handshake. I for one, do care for our fellow man, even if you don't. Whether of not Kuwait had oil, I would have supported pushing him out...I was there too.

>Oh, yeah, there are mass graves; I have seen them. There were torture rooms; I have seen them.

Guess what? Go back to Iraq and you can still see the mass graves, you can still see the torture rooms. Go to Saudi Arabia, go to Pakistan, go to Kazakhstan and other “allies” and you can see more. This selective outrage holds no water I’m afraid as Iraq has not been made safer for the Iraqis. They’re still being murdered only instead of one source of misery there are dozens.

Solving a problem by changing the source of the problem is not solving the problem.
Bush has killed thousands and spent billions to make the Middle East a more dangerous place.

At this point anyone who cheerleads this madness (thankfully a minority) either does not understand the situation or is a paid shill.

>>There ya go again, more left-wingnut talking point. Yup, Americans are filling up mass graves. You really are a poltroon, aren't you? Do we and should we interogate aggressively, including water boarding and other things that might make you poor little tummy queasy? Hell yeah. I have no problem with interrogating a captured terrorist who is not covered by the Geneva Conventions and someone who has murdered innocent women and children. You ever had to clean up those little body parts after a terrorist car bomb? Have you ever had to comfort a little girl after she had been tortured and raped by these terrorist animals and then shot off her toes...all to get at the parents...before doing the same to the parents? With you libs, THAT is the kind off stuff we WILL see here in America. You see, you anti-American bastards don't get it. These people want us dead. They do not care if you are liberal or conservative, black or white, gay or straight, man or woman...they want us dead because we are not muslim, we are Americans who believe in freedom, and they don't. Your attitude and your party's policies WILL get more Americans killed. You are just too stupid and your hatred for America is too great for you to understand it.

So, to use the liberal argument, just because you might understand it; until you have served in the Military and fought against the terrorists, until you have seen the death and destruction FIRST HAND, until you have one of these terrorists try to kill you or your buddy, you have no right and no experience to criticize those of use who have been there; you have no right no intelligence to criticize the plan or the operations. But then again, that is the lib-tard argument...

[templar knight]

Attn: Gaggle of liberal goons and assorted liberal bigots and haters-you know who you are:

I have to take my daughter to the dentist to get her pearly whites cleaned. The school she attends, which is private and Christian, is undefeated, has qualified for the state tournament, and is called the Crusaders. Our mascot is a knight with a sword and shield. If you are interested, please send me $5 and I will forward one of those magnetic sticky signs for you to put on your hybrids right beside your "Impeach Bush" stickers. Equal time, you know. Anyway, see you after while.