Damn
I knew I should have gone with the blue jacket.
But the whole primal male thing can be cool as long as there are women around to savage. And it appears there will be, as long as Edwards hangs in.
She has got to be kidding, I hope?
On the one hand she portrays herself as part of the liberated female neo-castrati, but inside imagines herself as some vixen, her career existing a notch above the skin trade? Just image google Shannon Elizabeth, you'll get the drift.
That's one crazy, um, interesting gal ya got there, John.


All this from the loser guy who is up at 4 AM posting crap. What a tool. Must suck waking up early from your Natalee Holloway rescue fantasy.
Posted by: Steve | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 07:58 AM
It's a good thing Dan's not a family man. Wonder what time he woke up today?
Posted by: scarshapedstar | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 09:53 AM
Jealous much, Dan?
Don't worry, even if Shannon Elizabeth won't hook up with you, at least you'll always have Google Images.
Posted by: Zifnab | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 09:59 AM
I think it's from software that takes an image and compares it with a database of celebrity images and matches based on facial features.
Here's an example: http://www.myheritage.com/
I don't think that sharing what the software says is necessarily a reflexion of how she views herself.
When did it become polite/fashionable/conservative to seek out unflattering photos of women you dislike and post them alongside degrading comments, Dan?
Posted by: The Liberal Avenger | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 10:37 AM
When did it become polite/fashionable/conservative to seek out unflattering photos of women you dislike and post them alongside degrading comments, Dan?
I didn't post it, or create it - I linked it. No complaints about the JC link that actually did create a photo then make disparaging remarks?
And I thought you libs were about equality.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 10:42 AM
Believe it or not, Dan, I dropped him a note.
Are you defending your poor behavior by saying, "Yeah but he did it to me first!" ?
Posted by: The Liberal Avenger | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 10:50 AM
Uh, Dan, if you bothered to look up the context of the pictures, you'd notice that Amanda thought the computer-generated comparison pretty ironic herself.
Instead you create this fantasy world where she sits around vainly comparing herself to movie stars and then schizophrenically rails against the media's objectification of women.
Somehow, I suspect a correction will not be forthcoming. Nice "equality" whine, though. I thought conservatives were all about knowing how to "act like a man."
At least we're definitely close to solving the mystery of Dan "The Ladies' Man" Riehl and the Missing Wife...
Posted by: scarshapedstar | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 11:25 AM
Believe it or not, Dan, I dropped him a note.
Are you defending your poor behavior by saying, "Yeah but he did it to me first!" ?
Thanks. And no I am not using that as a defense. I assume JC is a basically anon. Lefty blogger (not sure) but he took an image of me to make fun of. Okay, instead of screaming about it, I said fine, I can play that game with images that are available.
Some people respond by endlessly pleading for peace, some people just hit back. Frankly, I don't see the big deal. Some of AC's photos look good, some bad - but she's hardly an unattractive woman.
Finally, if you compare what I posted to her endless vulgar accusations hurled at a Right, one she clearly doesn't even understand in any real sense, or with any depth, her work is far more inappropriate than anything I'v ever posted, jpg, or not.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 11:47 AM
You're operating with the logic of a 6 year old, Dan.
Posted by: The Liberal Avenger | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 12:35 PM
wow dan u are sad and pathetic
dont be angry that god made you ugly, he loves all his creatures
Posted by: LOL | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 12:48 PM
the logic of a 6 year old
LMAO Your, I assume, blog buddy spews herself and her profanity all over the net - I point it out - and I'm at fault!! Riiight!
You know what - here's something for you, Marcotte and other Lefties to think about - when you spew all that vile hate, calling decent people on the Right everything from White Supremacists, to war mongers and so many nasty things I can't even begin to list them all, ... well, after you do that, don't come looking for a break when you eff up. Because frankly, you haven't earned one. Go plead with some turn the other cheek type if you're hurt. Not once has anyone owned up to her pathetic rants. And given what they imply, why on earth would I want a person like that naywhere near a potential President of the US?
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 12:48 PM
Dan, this is very, very sad. Surely you can find better things to do with your time on earth than this.
Posted by: grh | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 01:33 PM
'Not once has anyone owned up to her pathetic rants.'
If there was anything to apologize for, someone would. Witness when Markos apologized for the 'mercenary' comment, and the time MoveOn removed and apologized for the Hitler ad that they didn't produce but which someone submitted to their ad contest. And then, of course, you just ain't gonna find many examples of apology-worthy 'pathetic rants' beyond than those.
'...so many nasty things I can't even begin to list them all...'
You can't even begin because they're either a product of your Hungarian-babe-fevered brain or buried deep in blog comments. Meanwhile the right showcases its 'vile hate' in the mainstream, from Limbaugh comparing Chelsea Clinton to a dog, to Melanie Morgan's 'bullseye,' to Coulter's putting 'even money' on Hillary 'coming out of the closet,' to Beck's 'prove to me you aren't working for the enemy,' to O'Reilly comparing Moyers to Castro, to Boortz calling Islam a religion of 'violent, bloodthirsty cretins.'
If you want to compare Amanda to any of those mainstream figures, fine. I'm sure she wouldn't mind the extra couple million bucks a year that'd accrue from having her status elevated to the level of your mainline wingnut mouthpieces.
And is 'warmonger' really one of the 'vile terms' you'd hang your hat on for the purposes of comparison? Really, I didn't realize you cried so easily, Danny. I'll tell everyone I know to lay off the 'warmonger' line just to save your fragile sensibilities about those 'decent people' on your side who're busily pushing us into a war with Iran.
Posted by: djangone | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 01:59 PM
i have no idea what this post is supposed to mean.
Posted by: Olaf glad and big | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 02:20 PM
you're an idiot. she posted that, along with one comparing her to George Harrison (which I noticed you left out as it wouldn't make your point to suggest that she fancies herself a sexy george harrison) when discussing those silly 'submit your face and see what celebrity you look like' sites.
Had you done any looking you would have seen it: http://pandagon.net/2006/06/30/faces-of-pandagon/
Posted by: elsa | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 02:34 PM
haha proven to be a liar once again dan riehl
oh well, time to go back to bemoaning hitler comparisons
Posted by: LOL | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 02:41 PM
On The Internets it's called "GIS" for.
scarshapedstar got you nailed right. That's why you ignore it and comment on the next comment comparing you to a six year old by going on an incoherent screechy tear about how Uncivil The Left Is. Did I mention ironic?
Because of course wishing terrorist attacks on San Francisco, advocating the poisoning of Supreme Court justices, and generally calling for the imprisonment and execution of everyone who disagrees with the Republican Party line is soooooo civil, ain't it? And that's without even considering what Michael Savage said in any given week.
Cut the bullshit already. The verbal antics of the Right over the past several years set a disgustingly low bar that I can't limbo under even if I get liquored up, stub my toe, and start in on my favorite rants.
Posted by: JT | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 02:57 PM
I see the hive is in full protect mode, going to war to defend the honor of their queen.
This could not be any funnier. 15 million moonbats, all in a row screeching "This is all about nothing!!!", one after another, after another, after another...
For people who don't care, they sure seem to care. Keep stirring the pot, Dan. The stew is a smash hit!
Posted by: Pablo | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 03:10 PM
Its a fetish things ain't it Danny boy?
Posted by: owlbear1 | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 04:56 PM
"Its a fetish things ain't it"
What? Better still, as, I assume, a lib, whatchu got against fetishes owlboy?
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:12 PM
so dan r u going to admit that ur full of shit on this post or what? have some balls and be a man for once
Posted by: LOL | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:19 PM
"Dan, this is very, very sad. Surely you can find better things to do with your time on earth than this."
Sadly, no, he can't.
Posted by: Michael Moorcock | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:22 PM
"I see the hive is in full protect mode, going to war to defend the honor of their queen."
This coming from Pablo, official ball-kisser to Jeff Goldstein. Nice.
Posted by: Michael Moorcock | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:23 PM
Wow. Nice work, limpdick.
Posted by: Sorry | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 10:44 PM
Yeah, right. you Liberal idiots always end up looking like losers.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2007/02/ugly_i_dont_get.html
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Monday, February 05, 2007 at 11:39 PM
Let me get this straight... Dan gets 'hit', by a guy. So Dan 'hits back' at a woman..... Hmmmm, not really very manly it seems to me.
Posted by: boo | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 05:30 AM
Awww, don't worry about it folks. Dan's just disappointed he didn't get the job and is taking it out on her 'cause he's missing out on those Edwards hugs!
Poor thing.
Posted by: Clemency Nosangles | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 11:13 AM
once again, riehl-stupid, dan.
I thought you warmongers were proud of your warmongering. I've often heard you people on the right speak of us on the left as peace-mongers and anti-war, as if those were insults or something not to be proud of, implicitly implying that pro-war (i.e. warmongering) is the better stance.
You bigoted, war-mongering pathetic armchair warriors wrapped in piss-stained blankets of fear are the ones who use the ugly rhetoric to demean people because they are peacemakers. We just say it like it is.
And it's like this: you, and all of your supporters (like your and Goldstein's boy-toy pablo) love war, pushed for war, and fantasized about killing all the brown towel-wearing people for years.
Now, when we call you on it, you clutch your pearls and say "I do declare! Those dirty ruffians on the left are so CRASS! My! That language! It would make a sailor blush! (go kill muslims)".
Whatever, you fascistic loser.
Posted by: prozacula | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 02:34 PM
Attacking Amanda's looks is not cool, but as I recall, her vapid sycophants have done exactly that to others (e.g., Ann Althouse).
Posted by: Robert O'Brien | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 08:48 PM
Attacking Amanda's looks is not cool, but as I recall, her vapid sycophants have done exactly that to others (e.g., Ann Althouse).
Posted by: Robert O'Brien | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 08:49 PM
Attacking Amanda's looks is not cool, but as I recall, her vapid sycophants have done exactly that to others (e.g., Ann Althouse).
Posted by: Robert O'Brien | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 08:49 PM
Robert O'Brien, you have to actually point out where her "vapid sycophants" have done so, else you're just talking a bunch of smack. Yes, even if you say it three times. Bear in mind that if suddenly Amanda Marcotte can be judged by her commenters' behavior, Dan Riehl and Charles Johnson can be judged by theirs. Are you certain you want to go there?
Posted by: grendelkhan | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 09:45 PM
Looks like a typical Austin no-makeup hippie chick but she does have a nice smile.
Posted by: DRJ | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 09:54 PM
She's just dog-shit ugly. No offense, but this gal would make a locomotive take a dirt road. She looks like Ms. Cook, my fourth-grade music teacher. Damn, now I have to relive those moments with Ms. Cook. Thanks Dan. Next time nix the pic.
And a vampire taking prozac has appeared on your blog, Dan. I can just imagine what a picture of that would look like. No, I can't. It's just too wierd.
Posted by: templar knight | Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Robert O'Brien, you have to actually point out where her "vapid sycophants" have done so, else you're just talking a bunch of smack.
http://pandagon.net/2006/12/13/pandagonians-kiss-ann-althouses-ass/
http://pandagon.net/2006/09/16/but-theres-titties-in-that-picture/
http://feministing.com/archives/005710.html
(I realize the last is not Pandagon, but they have commenters in common.)
Posted by: Robert O'Brien | Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 12:41 AM
You old wingnut farts must really hate knowing that there's a whole demographic of women out there who don't need and wouldn't want to touch your sniveling little dick since they are smart enough and self assured enough to make their own money (yeah, think about your wife, possibly its not that she hates teh sex, maybe she can't stand your ugly face close to her).
Just imagine, some 'libber' type woman, working two jobs to support her family for little pay is going to be wiping your ass and the drool from your chin pretty soon. I'd suggest that you begin to learn ways to view women with a little more respect or you may find yourself laying in your own crusted shit, contemplating the pattern of the ceiling tiles wondering why no one wheeled you into the dining hall for the bingo night social.
Posted by: kate | Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 12:46 AM
Oh I almost forgot, should Amanda and Jessica take the 'I'd bed them' comment as a threat, as in "I'll show them and attempt woo them with my pathetic half-man skillz, then get them (somehow) to lay next to my pasty self while I flog my flaccid member to death," or as a compliment as in, "I know that the only woman I can possibly get in bed with are the ones I can make feel so rotten and shamed that they feel they have no other option."?
Because, frankly, if you're looking to get laid by any woman with an age under or an IQ over, say 60, isn't a good strategy.
Posted by: kate | Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 01:04 AM
kate, I take it you don't have a boyfriend.
Posted by: templar knight | Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 04:39 PM
Demanda got a well deserved bitch slap. If anyone needs to be descalzada y embarazada, its her.
Posted by: Francisco Franco | Thursday, February 08, 2007 at 10:36 AM
templar knight: I think you've discovered the worst possible way to proposition anyone, ever.
Posted by: grendelkhan | Thursday, February 08, 2007 at 01:15 PM
We are killing the rainforest
Posted by: john | Sunday, October 07, 2007 at 12:47 AM
My mind is like a complete blank, but so it goes. Basically nothing seems important, but I guess it doesn't bother me. I've just been letting everything wash over me , but pfft. I haven't been up to anything. Such is life. I can't be bothered with anything.
Posted by: asian fuck | Sunday, December 30, 2007 at 06:11 PM
Spam e-mails should be, should not be outlawed - Or: can, can not be outlawed, are examples of persuasive speech topic variants
Posted by: male super site | Wednesday, January 02, 2008 at 11:03 PM
Pot should be, should not be decriminalized
Posted by: muscle men xxx com | Sunday, January 06, 2008 at 08:15 AM
My mind is like a void, not that it matters. I've more or less been doing nothing to speak of. I've just been sitting around not getting anything done, but so it goes. Not much on my mind worth mentioning. I've just been letting everything happen without me lately, but it's not important.
Posted by: liveprivate | Wednesday, January 09, 2008 at 02:03 AM
Vegetarianism is bad, is not bad for your health
Posted by: cyber folds web | Saturday, January 26, 2008 at 08:29 AM
I can't be bothered with anything recently. I haven't been up to anything. I don't care. I haven't gotten much done lately. Not that it matters.
Posted by: cheer chix | Sunday, January 27, 2008 at 09:08 AM
Drivers who run red lights should be punished severly
Posted by: bang boat latina | Monday, February 04, 2008 at 04:55 AM
Today was a complete loss, but oh well. I don't care. So it goes. Nothing going on , but shrug. Not much on my mind these days. Such is life.
Posted by: asian xxx password | Thursday, February 07, 2008 at 01:26 PM
The school paddle is, is not an effective instrument to deal with bad students
Posted by: first time gay sex | Friday, February 08, 2008 at 06:01 PM