« All Quiet On The Leftist Front | Main | CREW Spins - MSM Bites And The Moonbats Swing And Miss, As Usual »

Monday, January 22, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d834db879853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Questions On Obama's Past Remain:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

http://www.peasantville.com/the_peasantville_blog/2007/01/insight_magazin.html

Check the above site for links to the relevant articles. Riehl is behind the curve on this one.

Insight Magazine Exposed as a Right Wing and Republican Sun Myung Moon Tool

Well, the Moonie rag known as Insight Magazine is exposed!! They went on a tear about Barack Obama and tried to tie him to a 'madrassa,' a Islamic fundamentalist school - and it turns out it's all a lie straight from Insight Mag. Further, Insight Moonies tried to incite a intramural skirmish in the Democratic Party by asserting the allegation about Obama came from Hillary Clinton.

They're on the defensive, but the truth is out. You cannot trust the Washington Times or Insight Mag or any other Sun Myung Moon linked publication. It's no secret that the Unification Church is strongly tied to the Republican Party.

Now we know how they work, an insidious web of lies, deceit and corruption. CNN is out for blood on this one and Insight Mag is on the run. It's about time someone called these people out for what they are - dishonest, corrupt, lying and part of the dangerously stupid rightwing.

Wow, good work, Danny. Only a few hours behind on trying to spin nothing into something vis a vis this non-story, which *shocker* has already been roundly debunked - much like the premise that you scored major points on CNN this weekend, whining about bad language in reference to Hanninty. It's not surprising though, that you feel the need to dishonestly distract while the public has so obviously rejected the radical right's take (read: fabrications) on current events.

But keep up the effort; you and your buddies at Panties Media make yourselves look like buffoons in public without any help from the dreaded MSM, or anyone else.

Spreading another right-wing lie, are we?

You already got your balls caught in a shredder with that bullshit you spewed about CREW. Now you have to issue TWO retractions.

Now, motherfucker. NOW.

Man, this Riehl loser is like lightning rod of wrong. If you've got a story you're working on, you absolutely positively DO NOT want him linking approvingly. Talk about the death knell.

Have you ever been right about anything?

How is misbehaving during prayer as a youngster and later being more devout having it both ways? Have you not changed since you were a child? I know I have. W claimed to be a texan, yet was born in CT and went through prep school and college there, isn't that trying to have it both ways? As for why his parents sent him to church schools? According to his book it was for academics not religion, if that's not good enough for you, well maybe it was a cost issue. Who knows, but I fail to see how where he went to elementary or middle school is an issue.

misbehaving

I don't think he misbehaved and he wrote the passage as an adult. All I am pointing out is that it stands in contrast to the "Christian" image he fosters on his site, that's all.

So what if he wrote the passage as an adult? He was simply relating an experience he had as a child. Have you read the whole book or are you simply doing the same thing you accuse the left of and pulling things out of context?

Hillary's operation will turn him out.

"All I am pointing out is that it stands in contrast to the "Christian" image he fosters on his site, that's all."

Dan just maligned every single "born again" Christian on the religious right. Maybe you should point out the contrast on everyone who claims to be Christian who hasn't been a lifelong devout Christian. You can start with Mr. 28%.

Maybe you should point out the contrast

Maybe the Left should get honest. You'd tolerate your candidates painting themselves up as Holy Rollers if they had to to get elected, yet you seem to despise that very thing. Lotta room on the Left to criticize on that score ... yup!

Again I fail to see any inconsistancy in a young boy not taking religion seriously and later being a devout christian. It's called maturity.

I didn't always pay attention in school and sometimes I didn't do my homework, now I'm a teacher. Should I give that info to my students on the first day of class?

Oh, and speaking of getting honest with your candidates, when do you plan on calling out Mitt Romney? He's moved so far to the right on social/religious issues that's he's unrecognizable from the candidate that ran for senate in MA in '94. If he were a dem you'd have already labeled him a flip flopper.

Uh, Dan... you're criticizing his religious beliefs based on his behavior in grade school? When I was in Catholic boys' school, I'm fairly sure I spent most of the "prayer time" contemplating the girls in the Catholic girls' school down the street, especially the ones on the swim team. And that was when I considered myself somewhat religious.

You know, Dan, there is a growing majority of the American that is sick of sanctimonious bullshit from charlatans and hypocrites about how our lives should be as perfect as theirs. You show me a man who claims that he's never had an impure thought or an irreverent moment and I'll show you a basket/closet case with little boys chained up in his garage.

It's called maturity.

You might have to define that term for Dan. I don't think he's familiar with it.

As for not paying attention in church, it sounds like every single adolescent who ever attended Catholic school in this country, including most priests I've ever spoken to.

Dan's also too dumb to know the difference between someone who considers themselves devout, and someone who becomes a Holy Rollers. One is concerned with his/her relationship with God. The other is concerned with everybody else's relationship with God.

you're criticizing his religious beliefs based on his behavior in grade school?

No, not at all. I am pointing out bits of his life he chose to relate in his book. I suppose you think he wrote it for a purpose other than postiioning himself politically? I don't buy it. Like all of them, he has been positioning himself for this since he started breathing. Good Lord you buy his stuff? I don't buy it from those on the Right or Left. There isn't one individual who runs for Prez in this country today who isn't some sort of egomaniac that's been shaping his public personnae for years. Geesh!

First of all, the 'interview' that you linked doesn't appear to have a single quote from his Aunt. It's a short bio that features several quotes from American politicians. Her picture doesn't quite constitute an interview IMO.

Second, you reject his assertion that he is religious because he tried to look for signs of angels during prayer? Is it really so bizarre that a young person would do something like this? I know that I did it myself during Sunday School. Just like I remember looking for signs of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus. Young people tend to take these things quite literally, and I think it's quite natural. I'm not sure how that you can reject his faith on this statement alone. (Also, my parents were secular, but somehow they didn't stop sending me to church every week.)

And really, how many politicians are going to campaign and say, "I come from a family of wealthy landowners." If you didn't notice, Bush certainly downplayed his family's wealth and presented himself as your average, humble Texan... (that just happened to attend Prep School and Harvard.)

"Before going on, as to who started all this? ......Hillary, the Right, and perhaps surprisingly, Obama himself."

My money is on Hillary, brillant work as usual.

Until now, I'd always considered this blog to be a credible source for right-wing opinion. I haven't always agreed, but I'd always respected the voice. No more. This post is complete and utter nonsense, so much so that it is now difficult to me to take its author seriously as anything other than a two-bit hack -- and a dupe as well. Dan, you've made a fool of yourself.

"No, not at all. I am pointing out bits of his life he chose to relate in his book."

Yeah. I know. My point is, nobody cares. There's a difference between autobiography and autohagiography, isn't there?

It's been totlly debunked after CNN went to his schol in Indonesia that he attended at 6 YEARS OLD!!! It's a public school with Christian children attending along with Muslims. It's anything BUT a madrassa!As usual , Obama comes out smelling like a rose and Fox news "We DISTORT You Decide" looks once again like crap after thei on air apologies to Obama. Keep it up Fox, you're virtually guaranteeing a Democratic victory in 08!

One thing is blatantly obvious now. FOX news and the right wingers are TERRIFIED of Obama and Hilary. Why else devote all this attention to them with nonsensical false stories. Me thinks Fox and the republicans protest way too much!! They're scared as crap. You got to love it!

"One thing is blatantly obvious now. FOX news and the right wingers are TERRIFIED of Obama and Hilary."

That seems clear to me now too, which surprises me. The GOP has some pretty heavy-hitters who could appear credible to the public. If they want to attack either, certainly they could pick apart their records?! Ha - a joke. We all know the wingers are loathe to engage in a factual debate vis a vis the material issues of the day. Of course, they think that the "Rathergate" is the ultimate acheivement in "citizen journalism."

But FAUX, Riehl, LGF et al have already stepped up the Swiftboating on the most asinine of invented "issues." Obama as a 6 year old? Faking his conviction purely for political ends? The absurdity and hypocrisy is astounding. If a liberal espouses his Christian faith in a public manner, the wingers instantly put on their tin-foil hats. I only hope you guys keep it up; as the lies of the radical right get more exposure, more and more of the public is realizing that the radical right wears no clothes - you have about 75% of the country against you as it is. Let's see if you can get up to 80% by Spring!

so the obama smear must have come from the hillary camp because, well, the conservative media have nothing to gain from perpetuating it? my, that's some airtight logic.

you don't think fox maybe thought they'd get a ratings boost by accusing a black presidential candidate of being a closet terrorist? nah. how outlandish...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Infolinks

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Memeorandum

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

Blog Roll

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad

2006 Weblog Awards