One Reason I Love Moonbats

Okay, it may be the only reason. Stupidity. Absolute stupidity.

After carefully reading a few posts, the moonbat in question has been calling me a coward and who knows what else for not answering a question on my military service. A question I've answered enough and am probably not answering, again - as if it mattered at all. But the real problem for missy moonbat is, the whole time she's been doing it, she's been calling me Dave and hyperventilating because I don't respond! LMAO

Disney would have to invent these idiots if they didn't exist! ; )

Comments

[sglover]

Heh. Guess she really got under your skin, eh, lickspittle?

[brad]

You know Dan, you don't make me mad, the way you'd like to affect lefties. You make me sad, for you. Trying to explain reality to you would be like describing a Kandinsky to a blind man. What's sad about it is you'll most likely never realize how blind you are, never experience the world actually around you, never know a moment's peace because there are people who dare disagree with you in the world.
I'm sad there are people like you, and upset you can't recognize yourself well enough to realize you aren't mature enough for something as important as politics. I don't hate you, because you're not worth the passion.
And no, I don't know why I decided to get on my horse and lecture you, Dan, but I have to admit it's fun. You're an easy target, especially with the unjustified attitude of arrogant condescension. You do realize how you behave makes it crystal clear how insecure you really are, right?

[Dan Riehl]

"You know Dan"

What was that, Bruce?

[brad]

Is your name not Bruce?
No, it's Michael
That's gonna cause a little confusion.
Mind if we call you "Bruce" to keep it clear?

Seriously, tho, Danny boy, you come across as having a very poor self-image. Resorting to the kinds of responses you use can only be seen as a sign of inner pain. The first step forward is to admit to yourself that you have a problem.

[sglover]

"You know Dan, you don't make me mad, the way you'd like to affect lefties...."

That's for sure. I just got turned on to this site the other day. Far from making me angry, it's a kind of splendid (though sick) entertainment, like watching a train full of carnival people get into a wreck.

Where else would I have run into the hilariously rabid assertion that Eisenhower "cut and run" from Korea?!?! Keep it coming, lickspittles!

[Scrapiron]

Why are there two independent countries named 'Korea'. Someone gave away half of something. Remember Germany, someone gave half of it away when they had a General standing there that would have taken it all in a few day, and probably Moscow if given a free hand.
American Soldiers have the guts but have kiddy, or maybe chicken, leadership in congress. Congress's give away of Vietnam cost millions of lives, do people like Hanoi John and Jane care? Not in the least, they just lick the blood from they're hands and look for more friendly blood. Looks like the dhimmi's will get a plentiful supply in Iraq and the rest of the far east. All we will get it the boot on the head by the terrorists. The only satisfying thing is that even the terrorist hate traitors and cowards so you will be first in the 'head chopping' line.

[Scrapiron]

By the way, Eisenhower really didn't give away half of Korea. Again it was the limp wristed in congress.

[Patrick]

Sayeth "brad": "You're an easy target, especially with the unjustified attitude of arrogant condescension. You do realize how you behave makes it crystal clear how insecure you really are, right?"

Mr Potkettle, meet Mr Black. Let's check out brad's blog, to examine the font of wisdom it must be. Hmmm, don't see a link. So what do we call a person who comes into someone else's house (blog), craps on the carpet, then calls the host a slob for having crap on the carpet? A pitiable creature who can't even afford a capital B? Maybe this should be a contest.

[sglover]

The calliope music continues....

"Why are there two independent countries named 'Korea'. Someone gave away half of something. Remember Germany, someone gave half of it away when they had a General standing there that would have taken it all in a few day, and probably Moscow if given a free hand."

Yes, I'm sure that in 1945, lots of Americans and Brits would have been delighted to keep the war going "a few days" more, just to extend the line of advance a couple hundred kilometers eastward. Because in those days everyone was enjoying the war so much. And that Red Army was just a pushover -- why the hell didn't we take them on, after we single-handedly beat Hitler? It must've been the work of liberals.

A central component of lickspittle thinking is their staggering ignorance of even recent history. In fact, it goes beyond ignorance -- instead of not knowing history, they cling to some a parallel, BizarroLand version.

"Mr Potkettle, meet Mr Black. Let's check out brad's blog, to examine the font of wisdom it must be. Hmmm, don't see a link. So what do we call a person who comes into someone else's house (blog), craps on the carpet, then calls the host a slob for having crap on the carpet? A pitiable creature who can't even afford a capital B? Maybe this should be a contest."

Ummmmm.... So in order to post comments, one has to have one's own blog? Is that your standard?

Jeez, is there any situation that you yahoos won't twist so that you can feel like a self-righteous victim?

[Phoenix]

> So in order to post comments, one has to have one's own blog? Is that your standard?<

Exactly, Percy.

It's kind of like if you haven't been in the military and seen action on a battlefield, you are not allowed to discuss the war.

[prozacula]

what's really funny, phoenix, is that Dan is trying to muddy the waters and claim he served in some sort of armed forces in an attempt to dodge that claim.

really, dan is just a warmongering pussy who gets his rocks off on seeing other people die for an ideal he is too chickenshit to stand up for on his own.

much like his dear leaders dick 'deferment' cheney and george 'never finished guard commitment' bush.

I don't see any problem with a chickenhawk pushing for war - he can discuss it all he wants. We just don't have to take any of it seriously, since he obviously doesn't have the strength of will to actually follow through with his bloodlust, and join in the fight over there.

[Phoenix]

Zoloftula,

>what's really funny, phoenix, is that Dan is trying to muddy the waters and claim he served in some sort of armed forces in an attempt to dodge that claim.<

Maybe Derek is trying to muddy the waters because he was in Control. They can't talk about that.

But you are definitely right that we don't have to listen to any of it. Personally, I think he's really fat and old and would take a sand nap within two days and be rendered excess baggage if he did go over there. eeu. What a thought. "Sarge, goddamnit...another fat bastard to haul to morgue." "Well, fuck, Sarge. Thow 'em up in the back 'o the truck. Who is it, anyways?" "Dunno... lemme look at his dawg tags..... Derek Dumbass Numbnuts." "Another dipwad republican. Serves 'em right. Carry on... oh, wait...I'll get a couple other boys to hep lif the sunbitch."

[DoubleLeftWingPatrick]

Shorter prozacula: bla bla bla talkingpoints bla bla chickenhawk bla bla no blood for oil bla bla stolen election bla bla selected, not elected bla bla bushitler bla bla bla.

Tell us again, prozacula. How many F102's have you flown? How many A6's have you trapped? Asshat.

[brad]

Dear Patrick,
You didn't post with a url for a blog neither. So double negative points for you. Thus, I still win.
JV wingnuts n their supporters are such a cheap laugh.