« Carlson Is A Fool | Main | The Story That Could Save Iraq? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d83511a12969e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lice-a-Roni:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Well, like the article says, the false negatives definitely outweigh the false positives so it's not like sending kids home is actually accomplishing anything.
But the again, the notion of actual results has become somehow vilified when it comes to school policy. I'm thinking of expulsions for taking Tylenol under "zero tolerance" policies, here.
Posted by: scarshapedstar | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 03:05 PM
You do realize that Oakland and San Francisco are not the same city?
Posted by: Legalize | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 04:41 PM
What's next, Legalize? Are you gonna tell us that sometimes the New York Times covers stories that didn't actually happen in New York?
Posted by: scarshapedstar | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 05:19 PM
Scar,
I think the main reason for sending the kids home is to prevent spreading the lice - which is easy to do. But there is something else. I'm not sure, but the treatment used to be some kind of horrid oil stuff put into the hair that had to be left there for a while. No kid wants to come to school looking like that. Plus, the infestation of lice gets into clothes and all that. It's one thing to send one kid home, another to have to send an entire classroom home. Can you imagine the parent uprising?
The 'zero tolerance' thing can be taken too far. Any kid in our state's system just dumps whatever necessary drugs off at the nurse's office. Plus, all parents sign a waiver for Tylenol, aspirin, etc. Kids can get it any time they want.
Posted by: Phoenix | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 08:39 PM
'Legalize' is a nitpicker.
Posted by: Steel | Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 09:58 PM