Jamil Hussein Not A Credible Source

Hopefully the same can be said about a Moonbat I had an encounter with this morning. It's hard to tell as you're sitting in a room alone looking into a black box with no picture. There's a small monitor below it but you get concerned about looking into it, if you go on camera you end up looking away. I was in New York, feeling like I was on enemy ground. Had a good laugh with the make-up gal though when she asked who I was. "A Right Wing blogger, I'm the enemy around here."

She actually got it, I could tell by the laugh.

Good people all around.

Weird fun stuff, TV. I was listening to Wolf Blitzer in the headset before he did that short promo. Nothing major, just kinda funny, I guess. Anyhow ...

Michelle Malkin's NY Post story is out and she follows up on her blog here.

WELL, the Iraqi Ministry of Interior says disputed Associated Press source Jamil Hussein does exist. But at least one story he told the AP just doesn't check out: The Sunni mosques that as Hussein claimed and AP reported as "destroyed," "torched" and "burned and [blown] up" are all still standing. So the credibility of every AP story relying on Jamil Hussein remains dubious.

Comments

[nova]

Dan: Well I tuned it and saw you and the other guy. You did very well. I think the other guy really bombed when his actions on holding up a sign on Fox news was revealed. Howard Kurtz by the way is the best thing on CNN and in the Washington Post. Not only is he the BEST media critic around anywhere he is a nice guy who is fair and always gets it right. Hard to believe he works for the Washington Post but he does. I have the utmost respect for Howard Kurtz. He really is fair and balanced. I am sorry I cant say that for Fox news or CBS or NBC or ABC or MSNBC.