Discount-Mats.com

via Michelle Malkin:

They dissed a soldier and now they're getting their due. Good.

Blackfive has more.

A reader wants to know how to send mats to the troops. Input appreciated.

Via Whosis: There's an associated email addy at the link but it looks like it might be a screw up. sportsfitness -at- gmail   That doesn't make much sense.

Registrant:
  Faisal Khetani
  PO Box 270693
  Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53227
  United States

  Registered through: Teknon Domains
  Domain Name: DISCOUNT-MATS.COM
   Created on: 23-Mar-05
   Expires on: 23-Mar-08
   Last Updated on: 03-Mar-06

  Administrative Contact:
   Khetani, Faisal 

Comments

[TheSpartan]

The guy responsible has been fired, is this a non-story yet?

[Steve Laskoski]

Why should this EVER be a Non story?

[TheSpartan]

Simple Steve,
The guy who made the stupid comment was fired. Nothing to see here, move along. Seriously, what's left to be outraged about?

[LaughingGas]

Sounds like a right-wing shake-down to me.

[Carl]

This mat-seller is an evil-doer. He should be smoked out of Wisconsin and brought to justice. We must comple the mission. It will look like cowardice to our enemies if we do not liberate Wisconsin from this evil-doer. Stay the course, patriots!

[Bill Adkins]

That's the way it works - you're held accountable for your actions. Like George W. Bush - he's screwed over the military, screwed up the war on terror, given us his Blunder in Iraq, shredded the constitution, spyed and eavesdropped on Americans and now, he's getting his due - he's lower than Nixon in the polls and at 28%.

[larry]

ahhhh, the wonders of the liberal idea of "accountability". as seen above, witness the leftwing unthinking kneejerk mind-dead robot admitting that there *is* such a thing as accountability, but then....just when it looks like he'll have to apply that self-admitted concept to another moron lefty - nitwit faisal, for example - quick like a bunny he segues into (surprise!) a "dumb ol' bush" rant.

ok, show of hands: who DIDN"T see that coming?

"accountability" like when janet reno 'took responsibility' for the brave incineration of women & The Children at waco: "my bad. i accept responsibility." and then kept right on doing her job protecting bubba for the next 8 years.

way to stand on principle there, liberal morons.

[TheSpartan]

Let's blame Waco on the man responsible David Koresh.

[larry]

see? like that! never mind the peabrained moron shit-for-brains responsible for the agencies that initiated, accelerated, and finally botched the situation, resulting in lotsa dead women & kids. after all, that woman was a liberal democrat, and therefore not allowed to be criticized.

instead, lets blame the crazy guy.

everybody got that? it's not the *allegedly responsible adult in charge*'s fault, its the crazy guy's fault.

except in murder trials, right? liberal "logic", at its finest.

[TheSpartan]

So you put no blame at the feet of the "crazy guy"? Were mistakes made on the part of the FBI, sure but let's not make the guy out to be a folk here.

Of course you have Ed Brown to make a hero out of now right larry?http://thespartanblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/httpwww2bloggercomimggllinkgifruby.html

[Legalize]

I find Larry's foul-mouthed ad hominems unfit for civil discourse. I hope someone gives me 30 seconds on CNN to blubber about how outraged I am.

[Dan Riehl]

"foul-mouthed ad hominems unfit for civil discourse"

Get over it, Legalize. If it weren't for foul-mouthed ad hominems unfit for civil discourse, no one would read any of the blogs.

[Legalize]

"foul-mouthed ad hominems unfit for civil discourse"

"Get over it, Legalize. If it weren't for foul-mouthed ad hominems unfit for civil discourse, no one would read any of the blogs."

Um, isn't that precisely what you accuse Mike Stark of engaging in with his "Hannity Sucks Cock" poster, and with "purile" leftists in general, professor? Isn't that the new meme? In any event, I know you don't read them, but there are a number of blogs of quality that don't engage in such behavior. People called "adults" tend to run them, however.

[Dan Riehl]

Why did you misquote Stark? And you really could use a sense of humor.

[Bill Adkins]

"brave incineration of women & The Children at waco:"
Funny you should bring that up - I've been thinking (something you should try, Larry) and I've come to the conclusion George Bush is a Koresh type and a Branch Davidian. He's walled himself up in Iraq and would rather burn it down with all inside in his fantasy world than embrace reality.

As for your remarks about accountability, wouldn't it be wonderful if, once in his miserable life, George Bush would accept responsibility for something?

[Legalize]

Because you whined so incessantly about the real sign; I wanted to see how much you would seethe over the greater truth. The real sign was funny, yet it was YOU who based a whole CNN appearance on its "purility." Granted, you did provide the rest of us with a chuckle at your inept performance ... and with your lame attempt at salvaging some credibility with the CREW disaster ... and your peddling of the Obama "madrassa" story AFTER it had been debunked

Oh, and I do have a sense of humor - I'm laughing at you right. Now. Alot.

[Oregonian]

"If it weren't for foul-mouthed ad hominems unfit for civil discourse, no one would read any of the blogs."

No, it's just that no one would read YOUR blog.

People who are interested in intelligent, rational discourse and insightful analysis would still find plenty to read at sites like Washington Monthly ( http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ ), Talking Points Memo ( http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/ ), and Dan Froomkin's White House Briefing blog at the Washington Post ( http://www.wpost.com/ ). There's nothing "foul-mouthed" about any of those sites and they all get far, far more readers than "Rielh World." Of course, they also have something to say.

[Dan Riehl]

"you did provide the rest of us with a chuckle"

Yeah, same with Kurtz. I was very pleased to see how my Mickey Mouse hat joke caused him to laugh at your boy - like more than a few others watching at home, I'm sure.

Talk about accepting defeat ... ha ha ha too easy, you guys are.

[Purple Avenger]

"No, it's just that no one would read YOUR blog."

Yet you keep coming back. Why?

[Phoenix]

Darn it, PA. You stole my line. These rude dudes are like heat-seeking missiles for this site. It's the only one that won't ban them. It's like egging the old lady's house on the street on Halloween - they just can't resist the fun. :)

[Oregonian]

Why do so many of us come back? Same reason that everyone else watches American Idol. There's something just morbidly fascinating in seeing a completely untalented wannabe make a gruesome spectacle of himself on a public stage.

Dan Riehl is the William Hung of the blogosphere.

[Bill Adkins]

Riehl is more like William not-Hung.

[Phoenix]

ha ha ha... You guys are losing your edge by being pretty funny. Get back to being crass and rude dogs....

[Artie]

Any of you 28%ers going to tune in to watch your leader make even more of an ass of himself in primetime? Bush is always good for a laugh.

[CalTech1989]

What really gets me is the fact that you guys don't think we should have went to Iraq. I never heard any of you screaming about Bosnia during the Clinton years. Saddam di the same thing to the Kurds. Typical liberal double standard. I don't agree with Bush on everything, but I do believe that the people of Iraq needed to be liberated from Saddam's regime. All of the poison that spews from the liberal's mouths is hurting the effort. The sad thing is that you want to see Bush fail. why is it okay to liberate a tyrant from Bosnia and not Iraq? Is it because your president is not in office? That shows us where your patriotism lies. it is pretty selfish to want freedom and not care about others living under a tyrant. Liberals = selfish is a logical answer.

[Carl]

Psst, CalTech guy - we WON in Bosnia and didn't get any Americans killed. A victory worthy of a carrier landing! But you stay the course and back your loser leader like a good 28%er.

[CalTech1989]

Real intelligent answer Carl. It really makes a lot of sense. I guess you think we should not have conquered Hitler either. We lost 50,000 men on D-Day. We also killed millions of civilians by carpet bombing. It also took several years to win. So you would have been against the U.S. liberating Europe of the Nazi war machine. Of course you will come back with an excuse for WWII. Please answer me this. Is freedom just for Americans? Should we not help people in trouble? You didn't address any of my comments except one. The comment you did express is as lame as Clinton and the definition of "is". I served in the U.S. military. Have you? matter of fact my 5 other brothers did too. Three of us were in Desert Storm. we all served knowing that we could be killed while perserving freedom. Those who have died in this operation ( God bless them ) did so knowing and accepting the fact that there was a chance of dying. This is something I have dealt with personally. To dethrone a tyrant in days and only lose 3000 heros who were trying to bring freedom to others is better than any other war. Yes it sucks for men and women to die for freedom of others, but what sucks more is the people who don't want them to bring freedom to others. These people are the liberal democrats. Just because you are not willing to sacrifice to help others gain freedom from tyrantical governments doesn't mean others aren't. i beleive that freedom is everyones right and those who have freedom have a responsiblity to help others to gain freedom. You liberals of course don't care about those who live in the tyrantical governments. Please address why you guys didn't want the Iraqi's to have freedom? Why do you deserve freedom and they don't? Please address the issue. Why are you selfish?

[larry]

anyone else hear that endless droning noise?

oh. it must be 'legalize' yapping forever on in the background, pretending to abhor "the right's" unpleasant, naughty-mouthed ways. what a pompous ass you are, legalize. you dutifully overlook the pathetic, contemptible garbage-spewing liberals currently infesting this blog - like the vermin they are - to whine about a conservative talking unfriendly. i'll bet your voice sounds just like thurston howell.

following, as always, the liberal commandment of "criticize no liberal ever". it's why you and your sorry ilk have nothing to say about janet reno's butchery; or 'cold hodd cash' jefferson's re-election; or alcee 'sure i can be bribed!' hastings coming back from his *impeachment for bribery* to win a *democrat* seat in congress. say hi to lovey, loser.

(unceasing background noise continues unabated) dronedronedronedrone

[CalTech1989]

Real intelligent answer Carl. It really makes a lot of sense. I guess you think we should not have conquered Hitler either. We lost 50,000 men on D-Day. We also killed millions of civilians by carpet bombing. It also took several years to win. So you would have been against the U.S. liberating Europe of the Nazi war machine. Of course you will come back with an excuse for WWII. Please answer me this. Is freedom just for Americans? Should we not help people in trouble? You didn't address any of my comments except one. The comment you did express is as lame as Clinton and the definition of "is". I served in the U.S. military. Have you? matter of fact my 5 other brothers did too. Three of us were in Desert Storm. we all served knowing that we could be killed while perserving freedom. Those who have died in this operation ( God bless them ) did so knowing and accepting the fact that there was a chance of dying. This is something I have dealt with personally. To dethrone a tyrant in days and only lose 3000 heros who were trying to bring freedom to others is better than any other war. Yes it sucks for men and women to die for freedom of others, but what sucks more is the people who don't want them to bring freedom to others. These people are the liberal democrats. Just because you are not willing to sacrifice to help others gain freedom from tyrantical governments doesn't mean others aren't. i beleive that freedom is everyones right and those who have freedom have a responsiblity to help others to gain freedom. You liberals of course don't care about those who live in the tyrantical governments. Please address why you guys didn't want the Iraqi's to have freedom? Why do you deserve freedom and they don't? Please address the issue. Why are you selfish?

I am still wanting one of you liberals to answer my question on my previous post. Of course i already know the answer and I even answered it in my previous post

[dboz555]

The owner is Muslim that will not give out details about the employ. How do we know if he really got fired? How do we know he is not protecting people who go to the same Mosque? No one is telling them to change their religion, but we do not have to take abuse because we disagree with their beliefs. Every American should be outraged.

[Pacer]

There is no "employee". I believe its the owner, Faisal Khetani, that did it. Now he is just covering his own you know what and trying to get himself out of hot water. This idiot lives at home with mommy and daddy and there is no way he could afford to have an "employee".

[Gary Niger]

Everyone should buy from this company.

Allah Akbar!

[Yoopermensch]

I just visited the Discount-Mats.com website, and it proudly announces that they sell “Anti Fatigue” mats!!! First they won’t sell mats to our troops, and now they sell mats that actually damage military fatigues!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For SHAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!