« Election Wrap Up | Main | Bush Turned Rummy Upside Down and Put ... »

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d834c4401553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Who Lost What?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What they think does not matter. It is what leadership thinks that matters. Leadership says JUMP they ask "How high?" just to get that corner office, that blond secretary and that latte machine

So Casey is pro-life? So's his old man. These guys are the fig leaves used to cover the second-most liberal leadership in history

The most liberal is in the House

Wake up and smell the horse crap. America, got hosed


Oh brother, so I suppose none of the voters who voted actually had any idea of the position of the person they voted for????

WTF?

America did not get hosed, America may have finally woken up from its long sleep enough to put a stop to the stranglehold the right wing fringe has had on it for the last 15 years.

Yeah! Look for a legislative push to reinstate the fairness doctrine, bane to conservative talk radio. And don't think for a minute that they don't likewise have ideas on how to squelch the out of control freedom enjoyed in the blogosphere.

"Ultimately, the real loser in this election was DC politics as usual."

Damn, Dan, that's a weird way to spin an election where Democrats didn't lose a single seat in the House or Senate (first time a major party has ever managed that). Only Republican incumbents lost, it was a throw-the-bums-out election only if you think all the bums in DC are Republican (and even I don't think that; you can start with slime like Emmanuel and Hoyer if you want to get rid of worthless Democrats).

Bob Casey, pro-life

Other than that he tells us so, I don't know what that's based on.

Brayley and Broyda sound like garden-variety lib Dems, except for immigration. The Hoosiers, I'll grant you, are conservatives -- then, they have to be, or they'll lose their seats. Baron Hill refused to go along with Clinton's gun control initiatives, and Clinton put a lot of pressure on him.

RE: "Frankly, the Republicans may be better positioned as outsiders for 08,..."

You miss the whole point. It's not about posturing, it's about leadership. The Republicans had control for six years and proved to be their own (and the countrys) greatest enemy. They had an opportunity to do revolutionary things like fixing Social Security, restructuring the tax code, developing a national agenda, fixing education, strengthening the family or driving a values and consequences based society. I invite you to take a trip to Beijing to see what an economic miracle China is and what America could be again if we had some leadership and vision.

Instead they missed in Afghanistan, completely missed in Iraq, created situations where graft, corruption and sex scandals abound. If they would have provided leadership first, I'm sure they could have gone about their petty "me first" agendas 2nd and not looked so disastrous. The rest of the world hates us. The Republican politicians proved that they are just politicians. No different than democratic politicians. They provided no leadership, political infighting, graft, corruption, sex scandals and have left a taste in the American publics mouth that will not be easily rinsed out.

So we have the political equivalent of 1976. We'll get to hear the Democrats say "Bad America", "Be ashamed to be an American", "Raise your taxes, lower your pride, do what we say because we know better than you." We'll get 4-10 years of disastrous posturing and pork glommed onto an economy that is struggling to pay for the old and rich who have no accountability and the politicians who give them everything they want because they vote for them.

Yep, it's exciting to be 22 and have 50+ years of working for the idiots who have completely screwed up our forefather’s great vision.

This is a disaster. And the Republicans got exactly what they deserved. So now I'm supposed to hope that the Democrats can screw things up more than the last bunch of Republicans or Jimmy Carter so that I can get another political change for more self serving politicians?

Focus on some issues and not whiney, he said, she said, dissertations of pontification.

Just as an aside, part of the Republicans problem is they scorned the middle for the fanatic fringe. Throw away the dancing with the religious right. We need to live up to the separation of church and state. It gives us the moral high ground when we discuss Islamic Fascism. It allows us to say that you can't have a religious court system as well as a legal one.

Greg

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad