Peaceniks Are Such Jerk-Offs

They're even planning a communal circle jerk for December 22.

I mean, you can't really envision these two getting laid, can you?

Ok, maybe one can. But do you want to? And at the same time you and yours are gettin' jiggy with it?

That's the real question.

Frankly, I think I'd rather go to war.

CBS/AP) SAN FRANCISCO Two peace activists have planned a massive anti-war demonstration for the first day of winter.

Donna Sheehan & Paul Reffell - A Partnership

But they don't want you marching in the streets. They'd much rather you just stay home.The Global Orgasm for Peace was conceived by Donna Sheehan, 76, and Paul Reffell, 55, whose immodest goal is for everyone in the world to have an orgasm Dec. 22 while focusing on world peace.

"The orgasm gives out an incredible feeling of peace during it and after it," Reffell said Sunday. "Your mind is like a blank. It's like a meditative state. And mass meditations have been shown to make a change."

Comments

[Rhod]

Are these two a couple? I'm roughly the average of their two ages, and this is yet another reason for the young to do away with us. Soon. Ice flows at noon, please!

There's been no more subversive, ridiculous, vulgar, arrogant, stupid, self-indulgent and destructive set of shitheads than low-end Baby Boomers, or those born below 1946. Like me.

We took genuine liberalism and strangled it, slit open the corpse and crawled inside, producing the zombie of leftism. Unlayable dipwads like Sheehan and Reffell are beneath contempt.

[larry]

awwwww, don't get too down on 'em boomers, rhod. shoot, baby boomsters are really a classic example of unintended consequences.

their parents have been described as the 'greatest generation': growing up deeply scarred by the Depression, then, just as things were starting to get a little better, off to fight ww2. crapped on by life its ownself more than we can begin to imagine, tougher than we can begin to imagine, (my dad was the baby of the family. his siblings told tales of dragging 200-lb. bags while picking cotton - at age 9, 10, 11 - (!); and a couple of months in 1933 where all they had to eat was oatmeal),....and then they settled down & had kids.

tried their best to give the kids the advantages they'd never had.....and look what happened. as you've pointed out, the boomers haven't exactly covered themselves in glory. but the thing is, they SHOULD HAVE! they came from magnificent stock! they had every advantage! fish were jumpin, cotton was high!

so what's the lesson? either "nobody knows anything", or "people need adversity, or else they become useless weenies"? michael crichton talks about this a lot: he thinks complex systems are completely unpredictable.....and the boomers PROVE that people are.

[Phoenix]

Yikes. Completely unpredictable is right.....considering the above comments.

So, the 'Greatest Generation' provided men who came home from war to have families, realized they liked the male camaraderie of war better'n playing 'Dad' and spent 80 hours a week at the office while their offspring were raised by Mom and the occasionally present grumpy Dad. Okay, so taking that lesson of Grumpus and the Wee Ones, family life evolved and women said, 'screw this - you have to help with the kids'. (I skipped the Summer of Love...) And men turned into weenies and exercised their shallow manhood by beating up coaches.

Anyway, Boomers sure rode the crest of the Tech Era to its fullest and good for them. "Greed is Good."

But, this is my point of departure in making fun of Boomers: They are the first generation for whom caring for others is non-stop. Just as soon as the kids *finally* leave, it's time to see the grandparents out. Boomers didn't have the option of telling their kids to 'go out and play' figuring not to see the little ones for eight hours. It had to be soccer or ballet or piano....whatever... On-call forever.

In recognition to both comments - yeah... Boomers actually worked and gave something to society. Those who became a bit more reptilian, as Rhod so graphically put it, -maybe not so much giving as taking. Hard to qualify but easy to identify.

[seekeronos]

Wow, that is scary - just the thought of what it must be like to picture her 75-year old granny nay-nays bouncing in the wind for all to see as she pleasures herself for the "benefit of mankind and peace" is nearly enough to make my large intestine convulse in waves of spasmodic disgust.

Is this Sheehan any relation to that other wackadoo Cindy Sheehan who likes camping out on Bush's ranch, stinking up the place with her horrific body odour and/or whinging leftist rhetoric?

[Cindi]

Ewwwwwwwwwww now I know why I like young boys and not fat old men.

According to what I read this morning, the Sheehans are not related. But they should be! Fuckin hippies.

[James]

"The orgasm gives out an incredible feeling of peace during it and after it," Reffell said Sunday. "Your mind is like a blank."

It occurs to me that this blank mind thing is not a change for them...

[tally]

two more that destroyed brain cells in the 60's, dirty old hippies.

[Gordon]

Now if only we could get those little Jihadis laid... There may be a sexual tension thing behind Arab Rage. Seventy-two virgins and all that...

[larry]

ok, i'll bite: what exactly was it that boomers "gave to" society? boomers love to blather on endlessly about themselves: the generation of change; we made a difference; we broke the mold, etc etc ad nauseum.

a hard look at these claims tends to indicate they're a load of crap. boomers, when pressed, usually like to claim civil rights as one of their grand triumphs. that's wrong: the civil rights action era began in the late 50's and passage of the c.r. act was in 1964. so the oldest boomers were all of 18 then. typical of their generation, they're claiming credit for work done by others.

as for their other "achievement", the sexual revolution, we'll make it short: what was the out-of-wedlock birth rate in 1960? 2%? 4%? what is it today? 30%? 40%? among inner-city blacks, the o.o.w. birthrate is usually higher than 80%.

nothing will doom a person to a miserable life in poverty with more certainty than to be born to a single mother in the inner city. nothing. but that's what the boomers and their signature accomplishment, the sexual revolution, have done to millions of people who otherwise would have had a decent chance to escape the ghetto. (this IS america, after all.) and we won't even discuss the degradation of the public schools under the tutelage of the boomers.

that's the boomers in a nutshell: the childish implemetation of utopian ideas, willfully ignoring history and common sense, budgets that are always wildly underestimated in the planning stages. resulting in staggering costs: broken families, ruined lives, entire generations of people doomed to failure & poverty.

"but we had the best intentions! but it SOUNDED so good!"