John Kerry: Liar In Chief

In a despicable and insufficient response to his comments insulting American men And women in uniform everywhere, John Kerry is attempting to turn the tables to make it appear as though it were someone else's fault he made his pathetic statement.

This is the man that the Democrat Party nominated for President in 2004. Every candidate running for office under a Democrat banner this year needs to denounce John Kerry and his disgusting comments, which betray his small-minded, elitist thinking, that American servicemen are somehow less than him and less than the college audience he was addressing.

This outrage cannot be swept under the rug. It is part and parcel of why the current Democrat Party is unworthy of heading up any branch of American government, most particularly during a time of war.

This has nothing to do with President Bush. It has everything to do with John Kerry and the party that nominated him for President just two short years ago. It is why good people like Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman are abandoning that party, or being tossed out.

As presently comprised, it is not a party fit for governing America; Kerry's role as a leader of that party should make that clear to all. And Kerry's fellow Democrats who fail to denounce him and his outrageous statement in the strongest of terms are unworthy of any patriotic American's vote.

The Political Pitbull has video of Kerry's history of demeaning our military. It's almost impossible to comprehend that a party seeking political control in this country would nominate such a disgraceful figure to be Commander-In-Chief.

Comments

[Captain Joe]

Rove, you magnificent bastid! You got sKerry to pop off while he was drunk.

[Ed]

The right blogosphere is so desperate for something to divert attention that they've seized on the misquoted remarks of someone not even running for office. Hilarious!

I feel bad for them, so let's give 'em this one...I promise not to vote for Kerry next Tuesday unless he apologizes!

[docweasel]

ok "Ed", so you believe Kerry when he says that he meant "If you don't study hard and do your homework, you'll be elected President of the US and get America in a war?"

That's not even a plausible defense. He made a bad joke, he obviously didn't think the ramifications through or how it would play. Much like his "voted for before voted against" statement.

Look, the guy has been in the harshest and most challenging media glare circus in the world today: the US Prez Election. If he can't figure out what is a gaffe and what is not by now, he's done as a national politician, regardless of what he 'meant to say".

He can't, and he is.

[Go Vikings]

Non-story. Back to my nap.

[paladin]

I'm beginning to wonder if it's genetically impossible for a Democrat to acknowledge wrongdoing. Do they never take responsiblity for what the say/don't say or do/don't do?

[Ed Muntin]

I'm with Ed.
I too promise not to vote for Kerry unless he apologizes.

That's two,
its a start,
I see a movement,
stretching from sea to shiniing sea,
from the heartland to the prairies.

[Purple Avenger]

Do they never take responsiblity for what the say/don't say or do/don't do?

Nope.

[don surber]

Ed is making the same comment throughout the right blogs. Of course, hard to say where Kerry was misquoted. Ed must owe Kerry money or something

[jaime]

How has George W. Bush taken responsibilty for the failures in Iraq? Other than blame liberals and the media.

[brent]

jaime I have read at least five post from you and I would like to know something. I know you hate republicans and President Bush. Do you want the US to win this war? I get the impression you hate the President so much you would love for us to lose the war in Iraq. Am I wrong?

[jaime]

The war in Iraq is already lost buddy. The goal is stability. No flowers and candy and Grand Democracies. Just stability. I wish for stability. I wish he haven't ruined the place for good. I hope we didn't blow any cooperation for other NECESSARY wars.

I hate the president's policies. Hell, I'd love to get shitfaced drunk with him or talk football, but I don't want him anywhere near foreign policy decision making.

And I don't hate Republicans. I'm voting for one for Governor. I hate sycophantic Bolshieviks who say stupid shit like:

"I get the impression you hate the President so much you would love for us to lose the war in Iraq."

[Phoenix]

How about spelling 'Bolshevik' correctly. I wouldn't bother, but you use it all the time. They were members of Russia's Social Democratic party, by the way. Find a new 'insult'.

[TrueLiberal]

I was there - Kerry was misquoted.

[jaime]

People who attack spelling on blogs are pathetic. And Bolshevik's are not necessarily Communists anymore. They can be GOP morey eels who puts devotion to Party before country as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshevik#Derogatory_Usage_of_.22Bolshevik.22

During the days of the Cold War in the United Kingdom, labour union leaders and other leftists were sometimes derisively described as "Bolshie." The usage is roughly equivalent to the term " Red" or "Pinko" in the United States during the same period. However these days it is often used to describe a difficult or rebellious person e.g:"Timothy, don't be so bolshie!" An alternate spelling is "bolshy". (Collins Mini Dictionary 1998)
In Israel during the 1950s and the 1960s, opponents of then Prime Minister David Ben Gurion sometimes accused him of being "a Bolshevik". Although Ben Gurion was a staunch anti-Communist, the idea was that his party Mapai had a stranglehold on political and social life and no opposition party had a real chance to win an election until the 1970s.
In present-day Israel, the term is used to accuse any politician, of whatever political colouring, of authoriatarian or tyrannical behaviour. During the 2005 evacuation of the Gaza Strip, PM Ariel Sharon was frequently called "a bolshevik" by his opponents.