A senior Democrat blogger has informed me that they have evidence suggesting Karl Rove traveled to Mark Foley's rehab this weekend and convinced him to solicit Kim Jong ll with a series of salacious IM messages designed to cause him to explode in a nuclear fashion, albeit a diminutive one.
Updates on Monday via Brian Ross who will point out how the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has placed America in greater danger, while not entertaining any discussion of Clinton's role in North Korea's nuclear development. It's being suggested that we not turn our backs on the most serious cyber non-sex scandal in history at this pivotal time in world affairs until after November.
SCHWING!!!!!!!!! Rove strikes, again.
Developing ...
SCHWING!!!!! ha ha....
Posted by: Phoenix | Monday, October 09, 2006 at 12:53 AM
How long before the putz Carter's face is on tv all over this? And Kerry Stupidle suggests again, it's Bush' fault for not returning to the two party talks that proved so successful for Clinton?
PHEH
Posted by: clarice | Monday, October 09, 2006 at 01:04 AM
Dan, I wonder if you have kids yourselves?. The only thing you are worried about is how to minimize the damage done by Mark Foley to the Republican party.The issue is:Mark Foley betrayed the trust of these young people. It's a shame you don't condemn his behaviour and call for a full investigation how this could go on for years without the top of the GOP bringing an end to it.
Posted by: coconuttree | Monday, October 09, 2006 at 04:20 AM
I did a little research, Dan.
Here are some things to think about ...
1. South Korea estimates the yield of the 'nuclear' test was equivalent to 550 tons of TNT. Sound like a nuke to you? Nagasaki was 15,000.
2. The Dear Leader, in his announcement, said with great certainty, that there was absolutely NO RADIATION leaked in the detonation. We have a flying radiation lab in the area now. If there is no radiation detected, how do we know it was a nuke?
3. We have satellites glued to the region that are capable of measuring throughout the electro-magetic sprectrum. A nuclear detonation, would have signatures in several frequencies, and this would be readily distinquishable from a conventional explosive detonation. In other words, we can tell with complete certainty IF this was, indeed, a nuclear device.
4. Given that the election is only a month away, this 'test' will get Foley off the front page and shake up the fence sitters re security. The results of the test will be pretty much the same, whether it was nuclear or a conventional explosive hoax.
5. I did the math, 550 tons of conventional high yield explosives could be carried on a dozen flatbeds. Or two rail freight cars.
6. IF it is a hoax, it will be found out - nothing knew there. That we didn't detect the deception will be the Bush administration's fault.
7. That can NEVER be proved. Does that sound at all vaguely familiar?
Sooo ... Without solid evidence of radiation, it was hoax.
And I will blame Karl Rove for the fallout.
The fallout being that the Democrats will lose again.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
OCTOBER SURPRISE?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
But ya wanna know the best part, Dan?
We can leave Ben Laden on ice till we REALLY need him!
Posted by: Steel Turman | Monday, October 09, 2006 at 04:55 AM
Coconutree,
"Mark Foley betrayed the trust of these young people."
Get a grip here. "These young people" are some of the best the nation's schools have to offer. The smartest and brightest are the ones sent to be pages. They are over 18 and far from retarded. They know how to say NO.
In fact, they're so smart, several, no doubt, planned to take Foley down 'just for fun'.
Now why don't you worry about something important like nukes and lunatics? Idiot.
Posted by: Phoenix | Monday, October 09, 2006 at 10:38 AM