« Balloon Juice Explodes | Main | What Tet Was And Wasn't »

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

A Real Perspective On Polling

Two days before the 2002 mid-term elections, Zogby vs the result.

Mondale was cruising by 5 in Minnesota

Minnesota
Mondale 50            
Colman 45   

Too bad he lost by 3 points.

Mondale 47
Colman 50

Strickland was a lock by 9 in Colorado

Colorado
Strickland 53             
Allard 44                  

Just two days and a 16 point swing later he lost by 5.

Strickland 46
Allard       51

Max Cleland, what can I say? Result in bold. Are you noticing a pattern here?

Georgia
Cleland 49                      46
Chamblis 49                    53

My, my .. the beat goes on.

Texas
Kirk 48                           43.3
Coryn 49                        55.3

Many are familiar with Thune, who didn't lose by the 5 Zogby projected. How many people stayed home on the margin? Your guess.

South Dakota
Johnson 52                   49.6
Thune 47                      49.5

Zogby had Lautenberg right in NJ, but under-polled Forester by 6 points.          

New Jersey
Lautenburg 54            54
Forester 38                44

Carnahan by 1 but 2 more popped up for Talent and he won. The typos are via Kos.

Missouri
Carnhan 49                  49
Tallent 48                    50

And going back to Oct. 22, these pearls of wisdom from DailyKos via Charlie Cook:

Cook notes that Dems have a good shot at taking GOP seats in Arkansas, New Hampshire and Colorado, while the race in North Carolina has become unexpectedly competitive...Consider, perhaps the surest takeover bet is Arkansas, a GOP seat. And if the GOP loses New Hampshire, which I believe is likely, then forget it. There's no way the GOP can take the Senate.

Too bad Dems lost all of the above by 5 - 10 points.

MSNBC says Big Dem Wins Likely. Now where have I seen that before?

Not voting due to polls may be the surest way to lose.

Update: The Dems are certainly working to pump up their liberal base. If the Republicans don't, conservatives, among others, will lose.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d83430440453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Real Perspective On Polling:

» http://instapundit.com/archives/033346.php from Instapundit.com
A LOOK AT PRE-ELECTION POLLS from 2002.... [Read More]

» Why Do We Even Have Elections? from Say Anything
The media knows whose gonna anyway: Yeah, the polls look bad. But so what? Take a trip back in time to 2002, where no fewer than six congressional races where a Democrat had a significant lead over a Republican in the polls were won by...Republicans... [Read More]

» Dan Riehl looks at the polls from 2002.... from Media Lies
....and discovers (surprise, surprise) the polls lied. Guess which direction they lied in? Cmon, I know you can do it. Dan'... [Read More]

» The ACLU Claims To Be Most Conservative Organization In America from Stop The ACLU
This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting moments such as when Ju... [Read More]

» ACLU Get Out The Vote from Conservative Thinking
Crossposted from STACLU This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting... [Read More]

» It Never Rains In California... from Hugh Hewitt
Leaving Cleveland and back in my SC studio by show time, but in the air until then. I give you Geraghty, The Indispensable. JG's point of view seems to be, "Who are you kidding? It is a war. We don't elect loony, defeatist Dems in the middle of... [Read More]

» Deja Vu from UNCoRRELATED
With all the concern over rigged electronic voting machines we've been seeing for a couple of years now from the left, there never seems to be any concern over the demostrately 'rigged' quality of this country's political polls. Dan Riehl does some leg... [Read More]

» Election ‘06: The Battle of November, 31 (October 19, 2006) from Pajamas Media
News Big Democratic wins predicted in a NBC/WSJ poll. Be warned: new electronic machines and new voter registration laws will make Election day chaotic. (NY Times) Opinion Now it's the opponent's turn: After interviewing Dr Bob Bowman, the democratic... [Read More]

» Quote of the Day: Hugh Hewitt on Pre-Election Polls from Bizzyblog
Actually it was posted yesterday, but his question is astoundingly on point: Now heres my question: When, in the last two cycles of 2002 and 2004, has any national poll of standing shown a Republican to be ahead at this point in the race where ... [Read More]

» How the Polls Predicted GOP would lose Congress...in 2002 from discarded lies - hyperlinkopotamus
How the Polls Predicted GOP would lose Congress...in 2002 [Read More]

» If you dont vote, Zogby will be a genius! from Mark Levin Fan
Thursday, Mark read an article entitled, A Real Perspective On Polling on the blog, Riehl World View. Not voting due to polls may be the surest way to lose. ... [Read More]

» Where's your pants? from Clicked
The Halloween costumes (some) women wear has been a water cooler topic twice this week for me.... [Read More]

Comments

I predict yet another Night with Carville wearing his party hat: http://www.thegreatsatan.com/archives/000693.html

Seems as if the NYT's knows this, so option 2 is in place...VOTE DAY CHAOS! Armageddon on Nov. 7th! Delays, lines, confusion!

Mark Pryor (D) did in fact win Arkansas.

When the voter goes into the booth, the realities of the world set in
and all the diatribe, bullshit and partisan crap get tossed.

The voter has a very simple dilemma this election cycle ...

Who will protect us better?

The Democrats will lose that debate every damned time.

Of course there's also the phenomenon of people lying to pollsters or just not participating in polls. I'm guilty of the latter, and I've considered doing the former.

Seems to me that it works agains the Democrats to say they are winning. I mean, evertime I see a report on the Democrats doing so well, it gives me the urge to vote (and vote often!) against them. My point is, if you are a Democrat, and are lulled into the sense of winning (because everyone else voted, you don't need to) this hurts their chances. Or is this comment too obvious? I really wonder if there has been a real study of the pyschology behind these events.

Perhaps all the dems got Diebolded.

Turman:

How is the question "who will protect us better?" relevant at all? The GOP better stay away from that one, what with all of their wars of pre-emption being fantastic failures (and boondoggles to boot) and allowing New Orleans to be destroyed despite the common knowledge it was a top risk. Homeland security in general is an utter orgy of waste, for which we'll be paying for years.

I'm more worried about being protected *from* this government than *by* it.

But maybe that just makes me an "ACLU moonbat".

"But maybe that just makes me an "ACLU moonbat"."

Yes. Yes, it does.

I recall a cartoon from the early 90s.

1st panel: "Carter vs. Reagan: Too close to call!"
2nd panel: "Wilder vs. Coleman: Wilder in a landslide!" (Wilder won the Virginia governorship by half a percent)
Third panel: "Would you like fries with that?"

Once again, Democrats think America is (and I'll spell it slowly for the Republicans and Independents...)S-T-U-P-I-D.

Democrats try to spoon feed us and sway elections with their opinions - well I'm sick of it!

We need to respond by spoon-feeding our votes right back @ them, and throw their "landslide victory" into a tailspin!

Reminds me of Reagan's big win in 1984. For all the Democrats' nationwide blustering, Mondale only carried Minnesota!

It was actually kind of sad to watch. But pride goes before the fall...

"conservatives, among others, will lose."

I'm wondering what you think is "conservative" about the current administration?
- Deficits?
- Loony tunes foreign policy?
- Incompetence at every level – war planning, disaster response etc?
- Penalizing hard work & success to the benefit of vested interests?

The only problem with your theory is that this year, Zogby is predicting Republican victories in the battleground states, not Democrat ones. In Virginia, for instance, Zogby has Allen over Webb by 48-37. Every other poll shows that race in a dead heat.

Re: GOP keeps house seat in 2002, Pryor (D) won the AR senate seat, not Hutchinson.

In both the 2002 and 2004 election cycle, Zogby polling was highly inaccurate. You can go to the New Yorker website to read more about his antiquated polling methods. That said, polling done by Scott Rasmussen which has been very accurate in the last election cycles also shows Republicans down in many close races. It is likely that Republicans will lose seats in the Senate and House and may even lose their majority status in both. Zogby being a lousy pollster doesn't change that.

Aaron,

"I'm more worried about being protected *from* this government than *by* it."

You can always move to another country. The nice thing about our liberty is it gives us freedom 'from' and freedom 'to'.

Your choice, bud.

does anyone here actually believe that bush and his administration represent conservative republicans?

come on guys, think about it. smaller government? fiscal responsibility? _competence_? preemptive invasion of sovereign nations? loss of personal privacy? the loss of habeas corpus?

_none_ of that worries you?


The democrats look pretty pathetic, I agree. but the current lot look a hell of a lot worse. dont they?

I also, when I read "Zogby," thought, "Oh. That explains everything." He's always 'wrong', maybe his numbers are good for analyzing some other portion of sentiment, but he's not measuring what everyone else measures.

Phoenix -- that's a crappy answer. Emigrating doesn't solve anything. Instead, like in Cuba, it bleeds off pressure on the regime to change and leaves those who had to stay even worse off than before.

Hi, good morning to all of you... Nice Guestbook ;-) !!!.

I enjoy your site very much! THANK YOUu

Cool!.. Nice work...C

show-vegas
n

Excellent web site I will be visiting often

Hi! Definitely nice and neat site you got there.t

I\'m love this great website. Many thanks guy<

domestic-violence

Your guestbook is example of middle-class guestbooks. Congratulation! I値l show your site and guestbook to my friends.l

I\'l be back... :)r

porch-swing

I enjoyed your page. Keep up the good work! Feel free to visit my page. It\'s cool too.

Greetings!..d

Check out my new site:)e

drown-rat-ring-sorrow

Hi! Definitely nice and neat site you got there.m

Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!/

Hi! Definitely nice and neat site you got there.w

This website is Great! I will recommend you to all my friends. I found so much useful things here. Thank you.

trade-show-display

You have built a good website:

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

ad

Blog Ads


Memeorandum

AdSense

Facebook Blog Network

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Blog Roll

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad