"Asian" Women, Jesus Cartoons And Liberal Boobs

"Asian" Women, Jesus Cartoons And Liberal Boobs ... what could these subjects possibly have in common? They're competing to be the epitome of Liberal hypocrisy, perhaps.

An individual created a crude website having to do with Asian women. The link above is to a blog article, but please be advised, it does contain some very crude language in quotes. So, a Chinese young woman saw the site and mentioned it to her "white" boyfriend, who was also upset.

Freshman Maryann Li stumbled across the website while browsing facebook groups. Li, who is Chinese, was shocked. “I showed it to my boyfriend because it was just so ridiculous,” she said.

Li’s boyfriend, Grant Woolard, is white. Woolard agreed with Li that the group’s treatment of Asian women was “demeaning and degrading.” But Woolard, who plans to study the Chinese language in Taiwan this summer and hopes to continue pursuing the language at U.Va. in the fall, said he also disliked the group for its portrayal of the relationships between white males and Asian females. “I was frustrated to be relegated to that category of the ignorant honky who drools over foreign flesh,” he said.

So, who is Grant Woolard? He appears to be the same UVA student who had his offensive cartoons about Jesus removed from the Daily Cavalier today.

The Jesus cartoons ran in The Cavalier Daily's Aug. 23 and 24 editions and featured "Christ on a Cartesian Coordinate Plane," with the figure of Jesus crucified on X and Y axes of a mathematical graph. Another, "A Nativity Ob-scene," showed Joseph and the Virgin Mary talking about Mary's rash, with her saying, "I swear, it was immaculately transmitted!"

The strips were removed at the request of the artist, U.Va. student Grant Woolard.

Some of Woolard's other handiwork also mocking Jesus and a note on the issue is here. Maybe he'll get the Liberal hypocrite of the year award, though I imagine he has some real competition from this Feministing boob via Althouse.

Eventually, Jessica from a blog called Feministing, shows up and says: "The, um, 'intern' is me. It's so nice to see women being judged by more than their looks. Oh, wait..."

Comments

[Digger]

Wow, what a pathetic story. I'm married to one of these "asians" they speak of. Spent a few years floating around Asia back in the day too. What gets me is that these groups and people take offense to the smallest thing and then go cry to the "assistant dean for Asian/Asian Pacific American students". Don't they see the hypocrisy in it all? Free speech goes right out the window with these people.

A guy puts up a website because he likes asian women, compliments asian women on their "hotness" and still they complain. It wouldn't surprise me if he gets booked with a hate crime for liking asian women too much. In this day and age you can't say anything, either complimentary or not, about someone without potentially facing some sort of charge or lawsuit.

It's funny how they went right to administrator without even contacting him first and then said “I wanted the people who formed those groups to take down their groups on their own, and not because some administrator forced them to.” They didn't even give him a chance!

At a mandatory meeting called by Rodriguez [the assistant dean ...

OK, OK, enough. I must run to my blog and b*itch about this.

%$#*#*!

[Captain Joe]

Blasphemus Jesus cartoons in Virginia? Hmmmm...

[Digger]

Seems your trackbacker is screwed Dan. It kicks out this error: "Ping 'http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/6065980' failed: HTTP error: 500 EOF instead of reponse status line"

Anyway. I posted my long rant (complete with pics of asian women) at http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001833.html

[Assistant Village Idiot]

You're looking for intellectual consistency. The common thread for Mr. Woolard is something different: "what makes me look cool?"

[IraqistheRightwar]

Wow. I can see why your blog is small time. Out of all the conservative topics you could be talking about, you chose this? Why don't you write about our IMPORTANT issues such as:

Iraq Civil War and how we will win it hands down and spread Democracy and Freedom
President Bush vs traitors McCain, Powell, Graham, Warner et al and clarifying interrogation techniques.
Bush Approval rating < 40% going into midterm elections and our hopes for success
Why Osama Bin Laden is not really our #1 priority in the War on Terror
Bob Ney's guilty plea and what that means for Our Party
Jack Abramoff & Tom Delay -- and how to avoid more Republican procescutions.
The Taliban resurgence & a record year for opium production and how we can stop them in the future.

Again, your blog is small-time for a reason... STAND UP FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN!!

IraqistheRightwar
"a fellow conservative"

[iraqistheRightwar]

procescutions = prosecutions

[Digger]

Because someone doesn't "fall in line" and cover what you think they should they're "small time". Give me a freakin' break.

I suppose we should pass a new rule. "If you're a conservative or Republican or right of center you're not allowed to blog unless you follow the talking points to the letter."

Where is your big time blog "iraqistheRightwar"? Oh, what's this? You don't have one? All you have is a link that goes to your email address. You're covering nothing? What a shame. You know you could be covering the Iraq war, Jack Abramoff, Karl Rove... Instead you wish to cruise around and criticizing others for pointing out Liberal ridiculousness.

Shows how much your opinion is worth.

[iraqistheRightwar]

Digger, I appreciate your post. But I am a motivator, not a blogger. Our Party needs to hold onto power in the coming elections. And my party needs me. I am doing my Amercian and Christian Duty to remind fellow Republican bloggers keep on message heading into the elections. Blogs are the newspapers of the 21st Century right? And people read comments right? So people WILL read what I have to say--including YOU!

Perhaps my calling my fellow Republican's blog "small time" was a bit tactless. I would concede that. But the underlying issue still remains--WE NEED TO WIN and KEEP AMERICA SAFE. I shudder to think what a liberal would do if he came into power--Health care for all Americans? Redeploying troops from Iraq? NOT waging all out war on Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Syria and all the other countries WE HATE? Nominating judges that will KEEP ABORTION LEGAL?

You know who is small time? THE LIBERALS.

I am off to go count all my money...

IraqistheRightwar
"Ann Coulter for President in 2008"

[Digger]

"I shudder to think what a liberal would do if he came into power"

And that is exactly the reason to post an entry like this one. To remind people what the rest of the world will be like -- and not just universities -- if Liberals get a free run of the country.

[rwilymz]

"I shudder to think what a liberal would do if he came into power"

So do I, but not for knee-jerk reasons.

"Health care for all Americans?"

Oh, yeah, gee, how horrible.

"Redeploying troops from Iraq?"

Smart move, but not for the reasons normally cited by liberals.

"NOT waging all out war on Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Syria and all the other countries WE HATE?"

"Hating" a nation isn't necessarily a good reason to have a war. And "all out war" isn't necessarily the best type of war to have.

"Nominating judges that will KEEP ABORTION LEGAL?"

Roughly two-thirds of all Americans want to have abortion remain legal, though they will say that not all abortions should be allowed. You can sustain an argument that abortion as an issue of privacy is strained constitutional law, but abortion is not prohibited by anything in the constitution, and therefore it belongs to states to allow, allow-but-regulate, or to disallow on their own. And since we are fundamentally a democratic nation, that which the majority of us wants -- unless constitutionally prohibited -- we have a legitimate expectation of having. In this instance, we have a legitimate expectation of having legal abortion.

I'd advise you to get used to it.