Preliminary report here, click through.
"We were planning on going to my house, because she said she wanted to go to my house," he said. "My intention was to take her to the house to have sex with her."
But the couple did not end up sleeping together, he said. "I asked her if she wanted to have sex, and she was fine with it," he said. "I didn't have a condom with me though in my wallet, and I won't have sex with a girl without a condom."


Uhmmmmmmmmm....i don't know
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:22 PM
A 17 year old guy is having a CONVERSATION with a girl in the back seat of the car where they discuss having sex in advance??
And the gentleman that he is, declines sex because he has no condom. No condom on him, none at his bachelor pad?
Oh brother.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:26 PM
I dont know either - just reporting what was said. Could depend on what the definition of is is, or sex, too.
Posted by: Dan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:27 PM
Ok..Joran wants to tell the truth. Good. Why wait 9 months? If he is truly innocent then his story would not have changed so many times and he would have already spoken the truth and we would know where Natalee is.
Actions speak louder than words I think...
Posted by: A Guy | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:32 PM
See,just like I have been saying for months now.Joran is innocent.He is very smart to have not had unprotected sex.No telling what he could have caught.He is obviously a very smart and upstanding lad.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:36 PM
I can see a 17 yr old boy, not wanting to have sex w/o a condom. It's called being responsible.
Why should either one of them, chance a pregancy or an STD?
And well in the end, they didnt have sex. So I guess Natalee's virtue was indeed safe.
Posted by: Donna | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:38 PM
XXX is correct. Is anyone believing there was not a condom to be found on the island of Aruba? Between himself and his two co-conspirators, I'm sure someone had one handy. Joran has been lying since June. Why stop now??
Posted by: Gator | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:45 PM
People people people!
Listen to the words this kid is saying!
What have we come to as a society?
Are we so anaesthetized to sexual provocativeness?
This is unacceptable!
Posted by: Oprah | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:45 PM
i heard Joran speak for the first time. i have changed my opinion. Before i thought he was guilty of drinking, smoking, gambling, rape and murder. Now i believe him when he says that he was too concerned about STD to have sex with Natalee Holloway and that he kept his condoms at home so as to have them ready if necessary. I agree with Bizman that Joran is innocent, but, unlike Bizman, I do not think Jesus was a fraud as Bizman has been saying for months.
Posted by: red sloan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:45 PM
I can see a 17 yr old boy, not wanting to have sex w/o a condom. It's called being responsible.
Why should either one of them, chance a pregancy or an STD?
And well in the end, they didnt have sex. So I guess Natalee's virtue was indeed safe.
Posted by: Donna |
Yes Donna,if Nat was a virgin as her mother claimed then her hymen was left intact after Joran left her on the beach as she wished.Afterall it was less than a 20 minute walk along the beach back to the Holiday Inn.She was in view of her hotel for sure.
Joran seems to be setting the record straight once and for all and for that we should all be thankful.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:47 PM
i heard Joran speak for the first time. i have changed my opinion. Before i thought he was guilty of drinking, smoking, gambling, rape and murder. Now i believe him when he says that he was too concerned about STD to have sex with Natalee Holloway and that he kept his condoms at home so as to have them ready if necessary. I agree with Bizman that Joran is innocent, but, unlike Bizman, I do not think Jesus was a fraud as Bizman has been saying for months.
Posted by: red sloan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:45 PM
Red Sloan,a new name,ok.
Jesus is as real as a person wants him to be as is Allah,Buddha,Kirshna,the TALL TALES of Beth Twitty are to her followers.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:50 PM
I don't find this credible. I cannot see two teenagers making out in the back seat of a moving car having a conversation wherein they agree in advance to have sex at his house, but then he calls it off because he has no condom on him or at his house.
Never happened.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:52 PM
"I can see a 17 yr old boy, not wanting to have sex w/o a condom. It's called being responsible". Come on this guy hasn't been responsible at all.. Thank God your not two black securities guards because thats what kinda of guy Joran is.. He lies.. Your way too trusting if you believe this lie..
Posted by: Rumspice | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:52 PM
XXX is correct. Is anyone believing there was not a condom to be found on the island of Aruba? Between himself and his two co-conspirators, I'm sure someone had one handy. Joran has been lying since June. Why stop now??
Posted by: Gator | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:45 PM
A guy will no doubt check every restroom at every gas station for a condom if they want to have sex with a girl bad enough.But such an effort must be worth the while of the one who needs a condom.Perhaps Natalee was not worth the effort in the eyes of Joran.
Dont know how many of you have ever been to Aruba,but not very many places besides casinos open at that hour of the night and I dont recall seeing any condom machines in the restrooms of the hotels of casinos.There could have been some but I was not looking for any as I am a married man.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:55 PM
Ohhhh kay then.
So let me get this straight. He took her to the lighthouse because she wanted to go there but then he didn't they went to the beach. She wanted to go for a walk. They had sex on the beach but no they didn't. He's now saying no sex because he didn't have a condom.
This isn't even about STDs or who drove the car anymore. How many times will the story change? Joran sticks to one version until something or someone comes out against that version than he switches it up again.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:56 PM
Oh and the no condom no sex. Sorry. I don't buy it for a minute. It doesn't fit his MO or his pictures on his profile or his "PIMP" status or his blog entries or his friend's comments on his blogs and website. That he suddenly grows a conscience and becomes an advocate for abstinence when no protection is at hand... spare me.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:58 PM
This isn't even about STDs or who drove the car anymore. How many times will the story change? Joran sticks to one version until something or someone comes out against that version than he switches it up again.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:56 PM
Perhaps he has been influenced by the nightly changing stories of Beth Twitty and feels it is the right thing to do.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:58 PM
I asked her if she wanted to have sex and she was fine with it?
Oh come on.
This is not real life its like something out of a 'how to obtain consent' sex education manual.
It is ridiculous.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:00 PM
bizman- a hymen usually has nothing to do with virginity.
Posted by: ooo | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:00 PM
I asked her if she wanted to have sex and she was fine with it?
Oh come on.
This is not real life its like something out of a 'how to obtain consent' sex education manual.
It is ridiculous.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:00 PM
Apparently Nat did not think it was ridiculous as Nat said yes.
bizman- a hymen usually has nothing to do with virginity.
Posted by: ooo | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:00 PM
OK,can I just say he left her as he found her,PURE AS THE DRIVEN SNOW!!!!
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:04 PM
You are wrong again, Bizman. Joran found her alive and left her dead.
Posted by: Skye | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:05 PM
Oh and the no condom no sex. Sorry. I don't buy it for a minute. It doesn't fit his MO or his pictures on his profile or his "PIMP" status or his blog entries or his friend's comments on his blogs and website. That he suddenly grows a conscience and becomes an advocate for abstinence when no protection is at hand... spare me.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:58 PM
FP I dont agree. I personally know a friend of mine who is very promiscous but has NEVER had sex without a condom and has called off sex numerous times because of not having a condom while the woman was willing to go without one. Its not about conscience its more about protecting yourself.
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:07 PM
Condom or not, Joran is LYING.
Posted by: Skye | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:08 PM
Condom or not, Joran is LYING.
Posted by: Skye | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:08 PM
If that be the basic premise then of course there is no point in discussing about anything that Joran ever said. Its just a sheer waste of time .
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:10 PM
See,just like I have been saying for months now.Joran is innocent.He is very smart to have not had unprotected sex.No telling what he could have caught.He is obviously a very smart and upstanding lad.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:36 PM
-----------
You are obviously a very sick idiot. Need soem land. ? lol
Posted by: ANOTHERGUY | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:13 PM
Beth sincerely believes her daughter did not party and had never had a boyfriend...true or false, this was her mindset when she got to Aruba, so to be told right off the bat that Natalee was probably shacked up with some strange guy she met and would show up at ladies night or was maybe in a crack house somewhere?? How could this not end badly? From that first night on, there was distrust between the family and ALE and it only got worse.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 03:28 PM
FALSE,Beth knows that her daughter was loose,if she did'nt then she does now.
She should have called the police in Aruba before she ever left U.S.,perhaps if she had maybe her duaghter would have been located and promptly returned to her upon her arrival,but since she and the posse deputized themselves they have no one but themselves to blame for the initial failed investigation.Yes the investigation that they were allowed to commandeer from the time they stepped foot on the island.They were their own worst enemies and continue to be to this day.
What she apparently thought because of her daughters past behaviors was that she had ran away or was hold up somewhere where she should not have been.If she for one second thought that her daughter had been kidnapped she would have burnt up the phone lines to ALE in attempt to find her quickly.What she was hoping for was to show up and retrieve her daughter yet again from a familiar setting or so she thought.She was no stranger to retrieving her daughter as her FAILURE to notify the local authorities is indicative of her knowledge of past shenanigans that Natalee had pulled.That is as obvious as the day is long.
Her initial crying to the trooper that her daughter had been kidnapped may have saved her from getting her 3rd DUI,but the thought of her daughter being kidnapped was not important enough for her to call the Aruban authorities.WHY XXX,DID BETH NOT REPORT HER DAUGHTER BEING KIDNAPPED AS SOON AS SHE SUSPECTED IT.Simple,she used that as a ruse to escape the tickets the trooper may have given her.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 04:58 PM
That was a great summation of events and the realities of this sad situation, the Twitty's ruin the investigation of this case due to their preconceived notions based on previous incidences with Natalee! She may have not been DUI material, yet or this time, but she would have gone to jail if the cop did his job that day on the highway! It is grounds to be arrested immediately if you speed at such excessive rate, it is a criminal reckless act to drive 120 MPH. Can we imagine what have happened if Jug tried this tactic with the cop? Straight to jail, I would imagine!
Posted by: Isanah | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:25 PM
I would imagine Joran would not go horseback riding without a saddle either.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:13 PM
f that be the basic premise then of course there is no point in discussing about anything that Joran ever said. Its just a sheer waste of time .
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:10 PM
Well damn Jack..you have to admit JVDS has established a trend. An old boss of mine used to say if it happens once it's an anomaly, if it happens more than once it's a trend.
Posted by: A Guy | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:14 PM
I can see a 17 yr old boy, not wanting to have sex w/o a condom. It's called being responsible.
Why should either one of them, chance a pregancy or an STD?
And well in the end, they didnt have sex. So I guess Natalee's virtue was indeed safe.
Posted by: Donna | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:38 PM
-----------------------
You are extremly sick.
AND BIZMAN...Just go to hell.
Posted by: ANOTHERGUY | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:15 PM
Bizman..do you have any thoughts based in reality?
Posted by: A Guy | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:16 PM
Joran will always be a liar. Leopards never change their spots.
Joran, Deepak, Satish, & Paulus know damn well what happened
as well as other.
They know where NATALEE IS.
Thats the Real truth!! ALWAYS HAS BEEN.
ALWAYS WILL BE . NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
Posted by: ANOTHERGUY | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:18 PM
COOL!!!!!
Exclusive: Joran van der Sloot Tells 'Primetime' About Night With Natalee Holloway
Duo Seen Together on Tape Obtained Exclusively by ABC News
The videotape shows grainy images of Joran van der Sloot and Natalee Holloway -- along with a group of her friends -- at a blackjack table at Aruba's Excelsior Casino on what may have been the last night of her life. (ABC NEWS)
Feb. 22, 2006 — In an exclusive interview with ABC News' Chris Cuomo for "Primetime," Joran Van der Sloot, the Dutch teen seen with American Natalee Holloway the night she disappeared from Aruba in May, said he planned to have sex with her when they left a bar together.
"We were planning on going to my house, because she said she wanted to go to my house," he said. "My intention was to take her to the house to have sex with her." But the couple did not end up sleeping together, he said. "I asked her if she wanted to have sex, and she was fine with it, she would even drop her usual fee" he said. "I didn't have a condom with me though in my wallet, and I won't have sex with a girl without a condom."
Posted by: Bozzo the Twitty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:20 PM
Bizman has over loaded his fraction of the one brain cell he shareholds with the rest of Joran's fans.
Posted by: Skye | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:20 PM
I keep hearing about his pictures and his "pimp" status on his blog. I mean that doesn't say anything about him. I have one on pp2000 and you can see pictures of me and my friends have fun and some people get the idea that we are party animals just by looking at those pic. but that doesn't say anything about me. We do what every jong kids do and that is having fun while you still can.
My point is and this is something my parents always say to me is that you should never judge a book by it's cover.
We don't know Joran and we don't know how Natalee is and we don't how Beth really is.
I am not defending Joran. I am not saying that everything he says is true but it does not give me the right to call him a rapist or a murderer cause we still don't know what really happened.
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:25 PM
-----------------------
You are extremly sick.
AND BIZMAN...Just go to hell.
Posted by: ANOTHERGUY | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:15 PM
What,what I say?????
There is no such place as hell,that is all fairy tale to control the masses.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:27 PM
I believe it. A lot of young guys would rather lie to the police and be suspected of murder than admit they didn't have a condom and didn't have sex.
Also, if she was sitting on the beach and he asked to escort her to the hotel, but she refused - I can see how he would lie about that and frame two black guys. It would be much better to be a murder suspect than admit she refused an offer to be escorted to the hotel.
======================
Posted by: Sgt. York | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:29 PM
Oh and the no condom no sex. Sorry. I don't buy it for a minute. It doesn't fit his MO or his pictures on his profile or his "PIMP" status or his blog entries or his friend's comments on his blogs and website. That he suddenly grows a conscience and becomes an advocate for abstinence when no protection is at hand... spare me.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 05:58 PM
FP I dont agree. I personally know a friend of mine who is very promiscous but has NEVER had sex without a condom and has called off sex numerous times because of not having a condom while the woman was willing to go without one. Its not about conscience its more about protecting yourself.
Posted by: Jack | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:07 PM
....................................................................
Jack you're missing my point. My point is that I don't buy his story at all. Not that those who are swinging every night don't pause when no protection is available that isn't what I'm saying, I'm saying in this case, with this kid, I don't buy it.
....................................................................
Anyone here remember last summer when we were finding all those photos of Joran? and the Tickle website before they took it down? and those on his Tickle buddy list (including the Aruban government spokesperson and the reporter from the Aruban paper that was on tv nightly?)
**I recommend viewing the Dutch news cast on the above link. even though it is Dutch, some words cross translate into English. There is some English speaking on the piece. Good footage, nice summary of what has happened over the past year**
Question to anyone out there.......... is Paulus such an abusive father that he made his son afraid of him? Serious question otherwise why we he be so petrified as to not tell his father he left her on the beach? at what point would he consider telling the truth? **side note** my own kids would be afraid to tell me something they did wrong but my son would cough it up the minute the authorities got involved. Why is Paulus telling his son to tell Natalee's parents "Nothing" and "you have no jurisdiction here" (to the Twittys) and to Joran and the boys "you say nothing"?
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:37 PM
Good golly! I sure hope Jug used a condom!
Posted by: trojan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:38 PM
Good golly! I sure hope Jug used a condom!
Posted by: trojan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:38 PM
According to recent reports Jug did not use a condom.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:41 PM
keep hearing about his pictures and his "pimp" status on his blog. I mean that doesn't say anything about him. I have one on pp2000 and you can see pictures of me and my friends have fun and some people get the idea that we are party animals just by looking at those pic. but that doesn't say anything about me. We do what every jong kids do and that is having fun while you still can.
My point is and this is something my parents always say to me is that you should never judge a book by it's cover.
We don't know Joran and we don't know how Natalee is and we don't how Beth really is.
I am not defending Joran. I am not saying that everything he says is true but it does not give me the right to call him a rapist or a murderer cause we still don't know what really happened.
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:25 PM
I have to disagree. YOu don't have to know someone to conclude a behavior pattern. You can do it by words and observation and by reputation of what others have to say about them. You must not have seen the numerous pictures from last year and what was posted in his online blog and comments by his buddies.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:42 PM
Well, I did see them...but if you saw mine you will think the same about me...but you really don't know who I really am.
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:45 PM
Well, I did see them...but if you saw mine you will think the same about me...but you really don't know who I really am.
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:45 PM
Again, I'm only referencing THIS kid not anyone else.
Another thought, back when Joran was in jail. Remember when they took him on the trip to the beach so he could show authorities where he left her? After two weeks he is still lying about what happened the night Natalee disappeared. No mention of the no sex because there was no condom. The kid is IN JAIL and he still isn't telling the truth. Again, at what point does he stop being afraid his dad will get mad at him and tell the whole truth?
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:50 PM
QUESTION: "Why we he be so petrified as to not tell his father he left her on the beach?"
ANSWER: He didn't have a condom and didn't have sex. That's why he lied to his father... better to lie to your father than admit you didn't have a condom and didn't have sex. Also, she refused his invitation to be escorted to the hotel... it's better to tell dad you dropped her off at the hotel and left her in the custody of two black security guards than admit she wanted to sit on the beach alone. Makes sense to me.
============================
Posted by: Sgt. York | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:51 PM
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:50 PM
Personally I think he is guilty as hell that is why he is constantly lying but that is what I think...I have no proof.
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:58 PM
QUESTION: "Why we he be so petrified as to not tell his father he left her on the beach?"
ANSWER: He didn't have a condom and didn't have sex. That's why he lied to his father... better to lie to your father than admit you didn't have a condom and didn't have sex. Also, she refused his invitation to be escorted to the hotel... it's better to tell dad you dropped her off at the hotel and left her in the custody of two black security guards than admit she wanted to sit on the beach alone. Makes sense to me.
============================
Posted by: Sgt. York | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:51 PM
Thanks Sargent. But she is missing. You still think it's better to tell your father that the girl you were with the night before and who is now missing, was dropped off at her hotel? After the video came back that he didn't do that you think it's a plausible idea to stick to that story? Even when others are arrested for it? I am seriously trying to put myself into the mind frame of this kid. If what he says it true, what was he thinking? He was thinking he didn't want his father mad at him for leaving her on the beach. Okay I get that. What I don't get is that in the face of arrests of two innocent men, and Joran had to know they were innocent, he still sticks to the same story. Why?
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:58 PM
Don't get down on Joran because he was afraid to have sex with a girl who had already been acting like a slut in C&C. He was afraid that a girl like her might have a STD and I tend to agree with him.
Posted by: Jody | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:59 PM
So, let me get this straight.
He first says she was very drunk and taking drugs.
Now he says she has had a lot to drunk, but wasn't drunk. Okay.
She told him she was a virgin, AND that she was a lesbian AND then she agreed, in some kind of advance sex ed conversation to have sex with him.
I wonder if this was before, during or after she was waking up and falling asleep, as Dompig confirmed was also part of his statement or one of his many statements.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 07:03 PM
Personally I think he is guilty as hell that is why he is constantly lying but that is what I think...I have no proof.
Posted by: Arubaanse | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:58 PM
We can ponder things all we want as far as guilt but it will be up to the courts to play out what happen. I truly don't believe a fair trial could be had in Aruba. I believe the people on that island, the natives, are not considered equals. I think they are treated as lesser people but that's just me IMHO.
I would love to see this case go to jury trial. I do believe the VDS would get a fair trial in the states especially in New York City where it is a melting pot of all cultures. People would probably relate more to the fact that they are foreigners.
I'm still wondering about the lies. All because he didn't want to upset his father. Wow, what a heavy influence his father had on him.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 07:04 PM
Good golly! I sure hope Jug used a condom!
Posted by: trojan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:38 PM
According to recent reports Jug did not use a condom.
Posted by: bizman | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 06:41 PM
Was this the recent report that has Jug impregnating Natalee thus causing her to run away and leave no evidence of any sort of crime occuring qhile she was in Aruba?
Posted by: trojan | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 07:07 PM
So, let me get this straight.
He first says she was very drunk and taking drugs.
Now he says she has had a lot to drunk, but wasn't drunk. Okay.
She told him she was a virgin, AND that she was a lesbian AND then she agreed, in some kind of advance sex ed conversation to have sex with him.
I wonder if this was before, during or after she was waking up and falling asleep, as Dompig confirmed was also part of his statement or one of his many statements.
Posted by: xxx | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 07:03 PM
Okay so now he is saying that she told him she was a virgin and a lesbian? (someone tell me I'm reading Myspace blog posts now) So she is a virgin and a lesbian and she agrees to give it up to him? Doesn't make sense. Why him of all people if she is a lesbian? I think you're playing with me here XXX. But let's keep going, and if she is a virgin why would he suspect she had and STD ( off topic but anyway ) and why would he consent to sex if he didn't have condoms?
Last condom used, do you remember to replenish just in case? I think.
Posted by: Florida Patty | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 07:10 PM
"We were planning on going to my house"
Planning? Well, did they or didn't they? And if not, then what happened to the plan?
RstJ
Posted by: RstJ | Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 07:10 PM