Okay, I'll link this - but not without some comment. It seems a group of individuals is raising money to run a New York Times ad to link an open letter to Oprah Winfrey. I believe the letter calls on her to expose what was obviously a bunch of nonsense regarding a portion of the Natalee Holloway investigation - that being the whole Jamie Skeeters fiasco, which was basically a fraud. The tie in is between Oprah and Dr. Phil.
I'm assuming this idea stems from the recent silliness over Oprah and a book.
My thoughts? If anyone thinks Oprah took the approach she did in that issue because she was at all interested in the truth, email me, I have a bridge you'll love. I'd guess her actions were the result of some calculation as to what book sales and audience reaction would be if she did this, or did that. I don't see that calculus working in your favor with this issue. But it isn't my money, or my call ... so good luck!
It would be nice to believe that someone in the MSM really cared about the truth.
An open letter to Oprah Winfrey Recently, you made a statement that, "The truth does matter." We believe that you sincerely want to represent the truth and only be a participant in truthful associations. Several months ago, the Dr. Phil show did a broadcast involving the Natalee Holloway disappearance. Dr. Phil showed excerpts from a taped conversation with one of the suspects in the case talking with a private detective, who had been hired by the Dr. Phil show. However, what Dr. Phil broadcast that day has been shown, after extensive testing by the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), to have been manipulated to falsely show Deepak Kalpoe (the suspect) admitting to actions, which he actually denied. (continued at link)


First of all I want to thank Dan for his support! Naturally, Dan may be correct that Oprah may not care as much as we all would like about the TRUTH - however she SAID she did - so we are in a way challenging her to see if she does in fact care. She is affiliated with Dr. Phil - and there is no question that Dr. Phil never backed down from that whole Skeeter tape mess - he may have taken it off his web page and not mentioned it in a recent Holloway update but that is a far cry from admitting that the tapes were bogus. One of the things that has personally upset me the most about this case is the misinformation on cable news, the teasing with breaking news, and the lies over and over again that have become truths just because they have been repeted over and over. No matter which side a person is on in this case - the method of handling this by cable has been disappointment and Dr. Phil perhaps was the worst. So please if you have not had a chance to visit scrux and read what we are about,or go to refugees, unusual suspects, or freedom blog - tomorrw we hope to have it in Aruba Today via Julia Renfro. It would be great if anyone would contribute to the cause, any donation no matter how small will be going right to the posting in the New York Times. thanks
Posted by: Jan | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 09:24 PM
Allready posted my name on the list but also will make the donation.
Posted by: nelson | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 09:47 PM
Dan, You nailed it! There's a reason why Oprah did that Frey show. I'll place all bets this ad will go unanswered!
Bruce Willis takes on Oprah
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11374136/from/RSS/
Gates, Oprah Winfrey Visit High School
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060216/ap_en_tv/people_gates_oprah_2
Posted by: Oprahfan | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 09:50 PM
MORE DONATIONS!!!That's the Damn Bottom Line Here people...
enough already!!!...
Posted by: afmomx3 | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 09:53 PM
afmomx3 - I certainly can see your point - and anyone can choose or not to donate - but even if everyone only gave a minimal amount - this posting could get in the Times - and perhaps we might be doing some good!
Posted by: Jan | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 09:57 PM
You are better off getting a response from Oprah donating to Oprah's Angel Network than placing an ad at the New York Times! It's how the Kingdom of Oprah works.
Posted by: Oprahfan | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 10:01 PM
I can't stand Oprah-she is sooo phoney. Turned off letterman when he drooled all over her. ? Just look at her eyes-all B.S. Can we say that or will her followers riot? Mooprahammad
Posted by: splashtc | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 10:38 PM
Dan are you nucking futs? Oprah's robotic fans will have you killed for questioning her veracity. Perhaps you are unaware of the real reason for the "islamo" riots in France. Be careful not to bring her wrath.
Posted by: Rick | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 11:39 PM
Where do I donate? I'd pay big bucks to someone to confront the Holloway/Twitty clan and all their obvious lies. PPV?
Posted by: medicinegirl | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 09:10 AM
You can donate here:
We have set up a paypal account to collect the funds. At my request, Roger has set up a page for us on scrux, which lets you easily make contributions. By using this link, you can also use your credit card, even if you don't already have a paypal account. http://scrux.com/contribute
http://www.scrux.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=141&start=0
Posted by: CSI | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 09:59 AM
Have to agree with you, splashtc. Oprah thrives on victimhood. Just what this country does NOT need. Glorifying victims? God... spare me.
As for Letterman, he's an idiot. O'Reilly showed Letterman for what he is. Nothing. I'm trashed that men who can make faces and pause and look stupid become such icons. Johnny Carson was the best and last of that breed of 'decent' late-night hosts. Jon Stewart? Give me a break. He learned his schtick when he was a four-foot tall teenager. Better to have people laugh with you than at you. He shows his true lack of substance in his interviews. TOO embarrassing. Now he will host the Oscars. ?? What is wrong with our country?? We're turning British... gag.
sorry.... I rocked off this post........
Posted by: Phoenix | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 12:19 PM
Where do I donate? I'd pay big bucks to someone to confront the Holloway/Twitty clan and all their obvious lies. PPV?
Posted by: medicinegirl | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 09:10 AM
The FUNDS they are collecting is to place an ad in the NYT with a link to an open letter to Oprah and is meant to harass Dr Phil.
Posted by: Skye | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 01:49 PM
Skye
Harass Dr. Phil?
The tapes/videos were not only incriminating for Deepak; they also toyed with the emotions of Beth; he gave Beth hope where there apparently was none. His revelations had her on an emotional rollercoaster. His pal from the boys club, Skeeters, is not listed amongst the professional polygraphers, or with any accreditted offices, that he claimed. Yet he was telling Deepak that he was the BEST there is! He, along with Phil let Beth down, when she put so much trust in them, to get a conviction, and they used the tapes/video for entertainment purposes and self-glorification. I know you don't care about J2K, but for Beth, don't you think you could be positive about the letter to Oprah?
Esmiralda Kimal 11
Posted by: a..incanada | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 02:38 PM
The media will go with anything, just for one day in the sun. Later, they often try to take things back. I have lost so much respect for the media
during the entire Natallee Holloway investigation. The truth is not any where near what the news has tried to portray. First Dr. Phil supporting the
blame against the boys, then a lead he has in Mexico. Sensationalism to the max. I do want justice to prevail, but will it ever?
Posted by: jgirl | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 02:46 PM
I know you don't care about J2K, but for Beth, don't you think you could be positive about the letter to Oprah?
Esmiralda Kimal 11
Posted by: a..incanada | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 02:38 PM
For Beth? That letter is not written as a complaint for the "emotional roller coaster" a grieving mother has endured. Her "roller coaster ride" started long before that tape aired on the Dr. Phil show.
Not only is that letter a waste of time , most of it is not true. Dr. Phil did not call for a boycott based solely on that tape. He called for boycott because ALE clearly mishandled the case and admitted mistakes were made excusing those mistakes by way of inexperience which is unacceptable.
The letter states that Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a brillant attorney when in fact she is an emotional moron that lied on several occassions regarding the case during interviews on the news. The letter fails to mention that Arlene is an Aruban Tourism "spokesperson". Her objective was to promote and protect tourism and her focus is how the case will effect tourism.
The letter states the Dutch NFI results but not the FBI results. Why?
Roger does not reveal how he obtained the tape he has posted on his site for viewing and linked to the letter. It is questionable, why is he privvy to the tapes?
Posted by: Skye | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 12:40 AM
Skye
Please back up all your comments with factual evidence. It means absolutely nothing the way it stands.
Es
Posted by: a..incanada | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 03:38 AM
a..incanada, Have you "read" the letter? If you have, you know what I am talking about concerning the contents of the letter. Otherwise, what part do you not understand?
Posted by: Skye | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 08:31 AM
Skye
All you are doing is damage control for the Queen Beth of Mountainbrook. Take a look at all the threads. You'll see that the Bethites are out in full force spouting ugly.
You are calling Arlene E Schipper a moron, and you don't know her. I would have to say it takes one to know one then. Roger has explained why the ALE chose Scrux to transcribe the tapes/videos. Could you imagine the crap if BFN was chosen? This last caper of HER MAJESTY, Beth is the limit. I believe she used the Find Natalee fund money to pay off "someone" to set up the van der Sloot family to think they would have a chance to tell their story. It all went down too smooth, to the detail. If I had a bit of sympathy for her, I don't now. And you Skye, I won't waste my time on your stupidity any longer.
Posted by: a..incanada | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 11:47 AM
I pressed all the right buttons to your control center , didnt I? LMAO @ in..canada
It is impossible to defend a letter composed of lies for the purpose of harassing someone. As a..incanada has clearly shown.
Clear your mind a..incanada and detach your part of the one brain cell you share with the others of your company and go back to some of Arlene's interviews and listen. Really listen to her.
And have a great day!
Posted by: Skye | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 12:26 PM
Don't pride yourself so, Dear Skye. The buttons you push are the misinfo buttons. Compare Arlene and wild-eyed lunatic Beth speaking/reading from the "BOOK OF BETH". Arlene is CLASS!
As for your pride, which is so evident from the bible punching belt you come from, have you not heard of this phrase:
"PRIDE GOETH BEFORE A FALL" And this will happen, you can be certain of it.
Do you remember Road Warrior (Dan) who used to spout hatered at the van der Sloot family? He spoke agressively and vengefully. Seems he now has his own blog where he states he is, believe it or not, a CHRISTIAN! So many CHRISTIANS" from the southern belt feel they have a God given right to spout their ignorances and lies. I'm not sure I'd like to see your bible of hate.
Have a good also, Skye.
Posted by: a..incanada | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 05:25 PM
Who said there was a comparison to Arlene? She is in a state of moronic bliss all by herself unless of course you consider yourself her counter part. Apparently, Arelene lives on the 51st state of the US all by herself. You do remember she said that in one of her interviews. LMAO
No, I dont remember Road Warrior. What does he have to do with this debate you said you were not going to waste your time on anymore? Cant resist trying to win a loosing battle, can you a..incanada? Just like that letter you are promoting. It is a no win effort of loosers.
And I only know of one bible. I havent heard of a bible of hate but if that is your bible of choice, rock on with ya bad self.
Posted by: Skye | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 06:14 PM
SKYE
You call this a debate, what you are doing?
Who was Road Warrior? Don't remember? He was the king of revenge at BlogsforNatalee, who led the revenge against J2K, yes this delightful man, who calls himself a christian, twisted though. Why did I come back? Because I devoted this day to KKK mentalities.
Posted by: a..incanada | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 11:02 PM
If Road Warrior is a member of BFN , I am unaware of it. I do not read every post or thread on BFN or this board either so I miss some posts. I admit I am not as dedicated as you are a..incanada. Apparently, Road Warrior offended you or hurt your feelings for you to have such strong feelings about him but in reference to this discussion your point is moot . The topic began when you asked me if I could be supportive of the letter for Beth, etc... and I answered. NO.
You are becoming desperate. Religion and now the KKK insinuations. LMAO!! If you knew just how much your stupidity entertains you would stop typing on this board removing all doubt of your idiocy.
Posted by: Skye | Saturday, February 18, 2006 at 01:04 AM
Skye, bison bulls when injured by a human, never forget. They continue to come back to the same place day after day, pawing the ground in anger, waiting to settle the score.
Posted by: a..incanada | Saturday, February 18, 2006 at 02:15 AM
I don't know whether this letter will result in Oprah addressing the lies/ deliberate manipulation of this tape on the Dr Phil show or not. Dan likely is correct, that the reason she addressed the problem with the book was because of the money involved. However, even if she does not, the open letter will bring this issue to the attention of the public who may be interested that misinformation was deliberated provided to an international audience via DR Phil's show. It was not just any information, but something that related to a high visablity criminal investigation.
The letter will direct readers to the Scrux site where they can hear the tapes and read the discussions. Roger, the site owner, plans to take down all ads on his site immediately following the ad running (think he said would do this for 2 weeks) so there could be no concerns about that.
I also do not think the goal is in any way to help Beth, rather to dispute some of her claims. Beth is using this manipulated tape as one of her justifications to claim that the J2Ks had sex with Natalee, when in fact, this was specifically denied in this tape. This also was a major consideration when the Alabama governor and Alabama legislator later called for an Aruba boycott. They were given false evidence too! I don't think Beth will like the open letter at all. But it is time for her, and others, to start sticking to the truth and not just putting things out there like they are facts, when all they are are her speculations. If someone wants to speculate, then that is ok, they need to make sure people know it is speculation though.
The goal is about TRUTH, FAIRNESS, and HONESTY.
People need to be able to depend on what their media tells them, that the information, to their knowledge, is fair and accurate. If honest mistakes are made, then there should be some room for understanding and correction. But when something is deliberately fasified, with the ramifications far reaching, then that is criminal.
This open letter is about much more than just the Natalee Hollaway case, it is about principles and decency.
Posted by: shonane | Sunday, February 19, 2006 at 04:36 PM
The goal is about TRUTH, FAIRNESS, and HONESTY.
Posted by: shonane | Sunday, February 19, 2006 at 04:36 PM
This open letter is about much more than just the Natalee Hollaway case, it is about principles and decency.
Posted by: shonane | Sunday, February 19, 2006 at 04:36 PM
Who are you , Roger, a..incanada or anyone else to decide what is true and what is not? You people do not have any more information than anyone else. Not one of you know how or where Roger even got those tapes, if the tapes he has was manipulated in the chain of hands or if Roger tampered with the version he posted on his site himself. YOU DO NOT KNOW. There is no way you could know.
The FBI has not released any information of their findings about the tapes. Until the FBI makes a statement about the tapes the tapes are just not important enough to continue talking about.
You people are setting up an "ad" to further spread lies about something you know nothing about. You may even be setting yourselves up for a major lawsuit or perhaps some criminal charges against some of you people that have signed that letter.
There is nothing related to principles or decency in what you are doing. It is disgusting.
Posted by: Skye | Sunday, February 19, 2006 at 11:13 PM
If Beth had gone down to Aruba Talk to the police give them what information she had and back off let them do their work, but she insisted these boys are guilty and the police let her controll the investigation. When you intimatade the people on an Island and act superior and wrongfully attack them THEM CLAM UP. If somebody knows something they are keeping it close. Americans have always acted superior and Beth was over the to, She should back off say I am sorry to the people of Aruba and may be she may have achance of finding Out what happen to her daughter.
Posted by: Mona | Monday, March 06, 2006 at 08:40 AM