How could anyone do such a thing?
"Some time on Friday morning Neil Entwistle shot Rachel in the head and then proceeded to shoot baby Lillian who was lying on the bed next to her mother.
"We believe possibly that this was intended to be a murder-suicide. Obviously the murder was effected and the suicide was not."


Obviously the murder was effected and the suicide was not."
Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 10:25 PM in Entwistle Murders
No SH*T! Geez, this guy is a piece of work. So he had financial troubles. Get a JOB! Talk to you wife before it gets that bad and ask her if she could go back to work for a while. I'm sure if given a choice she would have chose to get a job even though she would have missed Lilly terribly during the day. There is no excuse, NONE! Go kill yourself if that was your plan, ne--you would have broken hearts but at least your beautiful wife and baby---BABY would be alive!
Posted by: abigail | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 11:06 PM
ONLY A REAL TRUE EVIL DEMON CREEP FROM HELL COULD DO THIS SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
Bet he watched the Peterson case too much. What slime. Hope he burns in hell.
MOM & BABY ARE IN GODS HANDS NOW. God Bless them. They are safe now.
Posted by: Painfulheart | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 11:16 PM
If I were to kill my baby daughter, I would feel so bad that I would have to shoot myself in the head, because I could never live with that fact. So he chickened out when it came to taking his own life and ran home to daddy? What a loser! So sad. I bet if he had just taken himself out the mother would have provided for the baby and there would have been two innocent lives spared.
Posted by: kat | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 11:23 PM
ONLY A REAL TRUE EVIL DEMON CREEP FROM HELL COULD DO THIS SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
Bet he watched the Peterson case too much. What slime. Hope he burns in hell.
MOM & BABY ARE IN GODS HANDS NOW. God Bless them. They are safe now.
Posted by: Painfulheart | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 11:16 PM
People are saying he's a nice, great guy--well, everyone thought that of Pertson as well. Having a hard time understanding why some are defending him. He's a coward. A murder-suicide? Who makes the rules in that "deal" anyway? Even if he did kill himself after he killed his family did Rachel oblige? I think not! It would not surprise me if that is his story though--she agreed to do it.
Posted by: abigail | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 11:25 PM
a murder suicide? are you kidding me? so he had the nerve to kill his wife and beautiful little baby but not himself and he had the state of mind to try and hide the bodies and the weapon and run off to england? yeah I feel real sorry for this guy....my god. how can anyone do such a thing? shoot anyone bu a innocent baby..your own baby? this wasn't even a fit of rage whre he lost his mind he calmly shot them......I just don't even understand
Posted by: truthbetold | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 11:51 PM
I read or heard that Rachel found out about the financial problems--if so, so what? They got in a fight and he decided to "fix" it if that's what happened? Geez, what young couple does not have issues, especially monetary issues? Well, I guess some don't, but I would have been dead years ago if financial reasons was a just cause to kill your family. Geez, we live paycheck to paycheck, but we have no "needs", because we work hard and make it as well as we can. We are blessed for what we do have. Of all places why move to New England, where the cost of living is outrageous? Why not discuss the situation and ask Rachel to work? There was certainly some sort of job he could have taken. Uhhhggg. I'm outraged! Why not send them to her parents? Why, why, why?
Posted by: abigail | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 12:13 AM
Divorce!!! Rachel and Lilly wold still be alive.
Posted by: Colorado | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 01:08 AM
No wonder no one can understand why he did it because luckily there are not many freak selfish killers like him walking on our planet. He didnt plan on "killing" himself. This story sounds so much like the Christian Longo story...remember...hes the guy that killed his wife and 3 children then went to Mexico and acted like nothing happened. (google it). That convicted killer is awaiting death in one of our lovely prisons. Killing children is the most despicable hateful act in all humanity. There is NEVER a reason to kill a child....never.
Question: does anyone know how he got the gun back at his inlaws???
Posted by: melanie | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 02:03 AM
Fucking Satan in disguse. What a coward loser. Hope someone kills him in prison.
Posted by: Heartbroken | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 02:13 AM
HE couldn't face HIS problems. Damn! What is it with guys like this? It's always all about them. Narcissistic, myopic views of the universe in which everything revolves around them. And then they solve their problems by eliminating innocent lives that complicate the living process for them. I'm not a violent person, but people like this bring out the worst in my thoughts and inclinations. Give Rachel's family 5 minutes in a locked room with the weasel - no questions asked when the time is up.
Posted by: raindrops | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 03:27 AM
heartbroken, just a guess, but according to the time line presented he took it back friday p.m. i assume he drove over, probably had a key still as they had only moved from there 10 days earlier. the DA said he knew where the guns were kept, and knew where the key was kept to get into the gun cabinet.
raindrops, well said.
abbi, still waiting on annie to tell us why she feels as she does.
Posted by: jadensmokes | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 05:41 AM
My theory is that Neil Entwistle isn't as bright as some have said, reasoning not to kill himself because he couldn't figure out how to kill himself and still return the gun to his father-in-law.
Posted by: Neantaeus | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 06:15 AM
The "love" of money is the root to all evil.
Posted by: Observer* | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 08:37 AM
What an a**hole.
Posted by: p | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 09:39 AM
There is a word for men who snuff out their families and then back out of the suicide
Wussy
Now taxpayers have to extradite him and have a trial....he'll spend some time in the pokey and someone will write a best seller book, Creeps galore.
My opnions
Posted by: Justice4All | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 10:40 AM
Finds the courage to kill his wife and sweet baby daughter but looses the courage to kill himself then runs home to mommy and daddy. He is real piece of work. His lawyer said today that he didn't want to cause anymore pain for Rachel's family. HEY NEIL THEY WILL BE IN PAIN FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES! YOU HAVE PUT THEM IN A PLACE WERE THE SUN WILL NEVER SHINE AGAIN!!!
Posted by: Kelly3 | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 11:07 AM
Scum sucking bottom dweller! Throw him to the wolves, or put him in prison together with the most violent criminals they can find. If that doesn't do him in,
I bet there are several volunteers out there with inventive ways to inflict pain on him. Let them have a go! Child killers have absolutely NO excuse, in my book.
Posted by: one angry dude | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 11:50 AM
After all of the months and months of following the Peterson trial from very close up and in the meantime seeing Lori Hacking killed at the hands of her narcissistic husband (a very similar story: Mark living a lie of a double life - Lori presumably finds out - he thinks "hey! The only way to fix this is gonna be to kill her...no one will ever know! I'll just say she got lost jogging! Geez) this just reeks of narcissism and arrogance. Narcissists do not have empathy; they cannot feel love like other, non-narcissists do. Rachel and Lillian were objects in his own life; expendable objects. Like a used up Dixie cup. As soon as they didn't fit his plan anymore, he eliminated them. What was he thinking? I can't even imagine anyone killing their own baby. Their spouse? Yes...I can imagine that...but not one's own flesh and blood. It's the very first step outwards from one's self. It's as if one is killing one's self. He should have killed himself FIRST.
Posted by: Annalisa | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 12:07 PM
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2006/02/10/text_of_affidavit_filed_with_entwistles_arrest_warrant/
Link showing the text of affidavit submitted for arrest and I guess the extradition.
What a load of crap...he had recently complained about his bad sex life. Heck if this was a defense for murder, there would be lots of dead folks laying around.
I'm thinking he'll get his fill of sex when he gets to the American prison where he will be spending the rest of his life.
Kelly3, well said!
Posted by: jadensmokes | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 01:42 PM
3 years ago I had to get a restraining order against my former husband who is bipolar, was off his medication and had become a raging alcoholic.
He began making threats to me , including shooting me in the head while I slept, or having me killed by someone he knows who may have mob connections that we know. He made me aware he was fantasizing my death over and over in his head. Needless to say, I took all of this very seriously, and I took serious action to protect myself...and it was a terrifying period in my life.
During a deposition he admitted, under oath, of threatening to " blow my brains out and watch the blood and guts splatter on the wall." He said it so matter of factly...without any emotion, but I can tell you his attorney and mine were shocked by his admission and the graphic nature of it.
My former husband is an extremely successful business man, and no one knew the hell I was going throught during that time, or would they ever have thought that he was capable of such thoughts and potential violence.
It took him 18 months to get on medication, and more months following to get sober.
And just now, 3 years later, he is sober and rational and cannot believe the person he was at that time, and that he ever had such thoughts or fantasies.
Mental illness is real, and people lose it. I am fortunate that my former husband verbalized his thoughts, whereas these other men who we so often hear about today are silent killers, and their wives, family members and business associates never had a clue of what was really going on in their deranged minds until they act on it.
Posted by: dnichols | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 05:04 PM
dnichols, oh my gosh what an utter nightmare! I'm glad you are around to tell your story!
J-thanks for posting the link. Just like you said, "what a load of crap". This guy never ceases to amaze me. So now someone else murdered them, so it was not the typical murder/suicide I had in my head. His sex life? Sorry to the guys out there that are suffering from a dissatisfied sex life which might have to do that your wife/partner had a baby recently. Geez. Rachel had more important things to tend to besides his libido. Heck, maybe she knew he was crazy and did not want him in that way anyway. Freaking crazy! Sounds to me like he was more concerned about living his life in a certain way--financially, and showing off rather then loving his family. He drove a freaking BMW SUV. If he did not have any funds like someone posted earlier then sell the damn thing and get a Hyundai and a freaking job if money was the issue. But no, he is so conceided and has to "live" up to who he thinks he is by showing off his "things". As*wipe.
Posted by: abigail | Friday, February 10, 2006 at 08:04 PM
I cannot even begin to describe the anger and pure outrage I feel when I hear of a crime like this being commited. How could a man kill his wife and little baby girl? I have a little girl Lillians age. She is so sweet and innocent, the most precious thing in my life . Neil Entwistle threw the most precious gift he could ever receive in life away. He murdered his family and then was too big of a coward to kill himself. If he was that damn depressed he should have just killed himself and left his wife and daughter to live a much better life without him. I think life in prison is too good for a coward like him, he deserves something much worse for the unthinkable crime in which he has commited. God bless Rachel and Lillian and may God watch over and protect them.
Posted by: Havilah Ashby | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 07:52 PM
Neil,I can only hope that they allow Joseph Druce out of his cell long enough to choke your sorry ass to DEATH..he would do it with pride.eliminating one more true scumbag from the walls of justice.you sorry peice of shit.i can only hope that when you meet your maker he stabs you to death with his pitch fork and that you rot in hell forever...you fucking scumbag coward pussy bastard
Posted by: dan grasso | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 07:53 PM
Good day to every viewers out there.We are using this opportunity to inform you buyers that we sell all kind of electronics accessories,such as,flat screen tv,Dvd,audios,mp3 and many more.all the electronics we are sellings are all brand new and sealed in original box with complete accessories with 1 year international warranty.we look forward in hearing from you buyers.
PHONES ACCESSORIES
NOKIA 9500 COMMUNICATOR $200USD
Sony Ericsson P900 $143usd
Sony Ericsson P910i$167usd
NEXTEL I930 FOR JUST $150, NEXTEL I860 FOR JUST $130, NOKIA 9500 FOR JUST $200, SAMSUNG D500 FOR JUST $200, MOTOROLA RAZOR V3 FOR JUST $170 SIDEKICK 2 FOR JUST $140,MPX300 FOR JUST $200,P910 FOR JUST $170P800 FOR JUST $160,NOKIA 8800 FOR JUST $220,YOU CAN REACH US AT brandnewphone_dealers2005@yahoo.com
COMPUTERS ACCESSORIES
Compaq Laptop Pentium 4--------600USD
Royal Laptop pentium 3--------4800usd
Toshiba Laptop Pentium 4--------500usd
Sharp Laptop Pentium 4----------450usd
Nokia Laptop Pentium 4-----------480usd
Nec Laptop Pentium 3--------------350usd
Sony Laptop Pentium 4-------------440usd
Dell Laptop Pentium 4 ------------650usd
Canon Computer Pentium 3 --------380usd
Sgi Computer pentium 3-----------360usd
Prime Computer Pentium 4---------500usd
HP computer Pentium 3------------480USD
iBM COMPUTER pENTIUM 4--------310US
Thanks for your coopration
ERNEST MUSA
SALES MANAGER
Posted by: ENNYSON | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 07:55 PM
Neil Entwistle is such a cute, good-looking guy - what a waste! He could have found
a job as a female (or even male) escort - and that would have solved his two problems
(financial and sexual) at the same time. He is obvioulsy not a bright guy. Pretty,
but not bright.
Posted by: Kevin Wong | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 10:02 PM
TO ENNYSONA
pretty sick man I think.......... I'm stunned by your comments when I look at Neil Entwistle I don't see 'cute, good looking guy' (as you state) I see a murdering coward. Or maybe you wuld like to wake up next to him with a gun to your head, Picture this, Him shooting his wfe & baby, now do you think he's cute?
Posted by: ali-jaye | Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 06:51 PM
The news wires carry a story that says Neil did a Google search on "how to kill people by various methods." I checked that search just now, and as I suspected, it didn't return anything he could have used to effect murder without being caught. What a clueless space cadet to have 1) expected that such a search woudln't open him up to investigation if his family were to suddenly die, and 2) to have thought that offing his family would improve his life. Evil-stupid, or stupid-evil. I can't decide which he is. Maybe both.
Such a tragedy, and so avoidable.
Posted by: Bob | Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 07:13 PM
I looked at all the photos on the Entwistle website. Is it just me, or is Neil smiling falsely in each photo? There is something about his dark beady eyes and dodgy grin which makes him look odd. I definitely wouldn't trust this dude, not only does he look strange but he also looks like a geek - his haircut gives that away! If he did do this sickening crime I will never understand why. If he is innocent (which looks doubtful with his recent behaviour and movements) which other SICK F*CK would do this?
I don't buy the theory about a pissed-off eBAy customer doing these murders.
Posted by: RadgyGadgy | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 01:11 PM
It is really sad that people will do things like this.
Sad because there many people like this out there, and we may even know such evils, I respond back to dnichols who is telling us a very important lesson here. Honestly you can find that people will approach you, be your friends and then display alot of pain, alot of hate. Ive experienced what dnichols is telling us, and Im a man. Now, it is true that you can know people gentle in nature(so they seem), the greates indicator people is when that someone starts controlling your freedomn in anyway. I promise this is the begining, and then they hide and show a good side to others, please do remember. what dnichols said is one side of things - truth is the wife beater at home can either appear lovely and harmless, if they become to friendly, or they can be introvert and violent, and if someone cuts off your friends from you that is danger. why? because it is easier for a lion to finnish of an impala alone. The whole herd would make it impossible otherwise. This same senario is true in cases where a lonly wife to a violent husband can easily become a victim. I definently suggest just like dnichols, that if you have friends tell them what whoever is doing to you, watch out, and take care... remeber that if you can advertise on the web how to kill another soul, and you can buy guns for fun (whatever fun?) as I saw a television show last night of Texas cowboys shooting for fun, then what sick world are we living in, civilized societies with successful driven men start to decide who should live or not because they think they are god. I will say that I would terminate myself before any other human, and that is human. Not machine, not animal, not over powering, not controlling for the sake of excersising power. Think about it if someone is frightened by you then that should be enough to retire and go away.
She was a victim of silent death, they possed and looked happy, but that was a lie, he was abusing her, with everytime expanding his power more and more, a time bomb.
Posted by: rocks | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 02:01 PM
One sorry ass****, who thinks only of himself, period...obviously did not think of the consequences of his
murderous act..He is oblivious to the fact that he would be
the first suspect to be questioned..He is so delusional...Who is his family??? How did he met Rachel? There must have been some indication that he was OFF before they married. A primo
coward of the first order..he never intended to commit suicide,
no way...the narcisists never do.
Posted by: Rose H. | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 09:40 PM
Sir,s
I would just like to appologise to the American people for the discusting behaviuor of one of our citizens while living in your country. British people are discusted by the acts of this man in your country and we sincerely hope that the American justice system will punish Mr Entwistle for those terrible crimes he commited.
Murder is rare in the UK and most British people are shocked beyong belief
by this discusting act of violence. No British person would be willing ot protect such a person.
At least you have him to pay for those crimes.
Murder of any child is seen here as the worst of the worst. I this to you all. Good luck with the prosecution, we don't want him back here.
Bill
Posted by: Bill Webber | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 07:26 AM
Hey All...
I just saw the news and that lying piece of shit was in shackles and hand cuffs... I hope it was all worth it for him.... I think they should do the tax payers a big favor and shoot that bastard in the middle of Hopkinton square with 22 caliber bullets.. making sure not to kill him right away and making sure he suffers a long terrible death... nobody asked... just my opinion!!!
Posted by: Steve in Medford Mass | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 08:54 AM
I second the post by Havilah Ashby! This bastard will get his compliments of our prison "justice system." It won't bring back his wife and baby, and it won't lessen the pain her family will suffer the rest of their lives, but at least the little coward didn't get away with it. He'll pay.
Posted by: Jack | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 10:24 AM
At first, thats a few days ago, I said to myself: if this guy didn't come back to the US upon hearing news that his wife and child had been shot and let's not forget not turning up for their funeral, either he was guilty or he was in on the murder or he had to leave the US because he was going to get killed by however killed his family.
I don't know what to think now, I cannot allow myself to jump to conclusions. Obviously his defence doesn't look good. Theres the gun, theres the stories he told his parents that didn't match with the facts. On the other hand, theres also the fact that he didnt fight extradition, the fact that 'who hasnt looked at porn on the internet' seriously. The fact that he looked at 'suicide' on the internet (i searched for suicides on the internet, pact suicides in japan, executions and beheadings and war pictures or mpegs). Simply because i'm interested in the human mental thought condition before or during and after an act. That doesnt make me a killer. And theres the fact that hes not american. People in England don't grow up with guns or the violence that exists in the US. Our TVs are not full of school shootings, gun suicides, gun murders like their are in the US.
Hell, our cops don't even have them.
People in England just don't grow up in the same gun violent environment as the Americans do.
Saying that I just don't know whether the guy did it or not. It's easy to say he did it without thinking for a minute.
Maybe he ripped someone off, someone heavy and he got pissed at him and killed his family he bugged out and left for england.
But then you have the GUN again. It was his father in laws gun. He went in the house twice to pick up the gun and drop it back off again, and his father in law USED the same gun the NEXT day for practice shooting? And this gun hadn't been used in awhile.
I don't know but I'm very interested in seeing the outcome. Reading all the posts here and not seeing one, I'm sure I will be getting drilled for my thoughts, since all of u guys have already made up your minds it seems.
Maybe U are right, probably............let's see.
Posted by: david | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 03:17 PM
He claims innocent; then why did he purchase a one-way ticket to the UK?
Posted by: Kevin | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 03:45 PM
You're right Kevin. But basically, was he THAT stupid? To leave the US, knowing fully well that he would be a suspect? Not coming back to the funeral or upon hearing the news that his wife and baby were shot dead?
Was he THAT stupid????
He's either an extremely stupid guy, or he didnt do it.
I saw him today on TV in court. Again let's see the developments.
One thing is for sure, he can't get a fair trial and thats a fact.
Posted by: david | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 03:52 PM
If he killed his wife and daughter, he would have not left the US, he would have called the police when he saw his family dead on the bed. i agree with David there when he said that its very convinient really that the next day, his father-in-law used the gun therefore erasing any evidence left on that weapon or is it that its just an alibi for the presence of his prints on the murder weapon(father-in-law). Were talking freely here, arent we?
Posted by: shawna | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 04:29 PM
or the presence of gun powder on his hands(father-in-law)
Posted by: shawna | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 04:37 PM
"Some time on Friday morning Neil Entwistle shot Rachel in the head and then proceeded to shoot baby Lillian who was lying on the bed next to her mother."
Really? And you know this - how?
I was under the impression that a person must always be presumed innocent of a crime until proven guilty in a Court of Law.
The presumption of innocence is a cornerstone of a democratic society.
The fact is, you have no idea who killed this woman and her child. On the face of it, things may look bad for Neil Entwistle, but things are not always what they appear. It is very wrong of you to condemn this man on the basis of your suppositions, and before he has had an opportunity to defend himself in Court.
Posted by: Paul Martin | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 05:18 PM
This guys is really an a**sh**le. He is probably an animal. He should be subject to punishment. He should rot in jail as a loner.
Posted by: John Garnet | Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 10:42 PM
Paul and David - Good that sane people are joining the debate. The facts do seem very inconsistent, but it's a small mind that judges without asking questions first. If everyone had the same reactionary attitudes then we'd be back to lynching people in the streets, and according to their own rules of evidence, everyone who has posted suggestions of violent reprisal on this website would be suspect.
This was a horrible, tragic and unforgivable act, and we must be rational about investigating it's perpetration, or we are starting down a dark road ourselves.
Posted by: Reason | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 06:43 AM
Paul - Are you addressing District Attorney Martha Coakley? Because the post you reference (I didn't write it by the way) was just quoting from her press statement on the day they issued the arrest warrant.
Posted by: tem | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 12:26 PM
Yes Paul, but let's be real. Who would kill a young mother and baby? No forced entry, nothing stolen, what motive could there possibly be. Yes, everyone deserves a fair trial. I feel however it is so obvious as to be superfluous who committed this crime, don't you? Plus, how do you dispute the fact that his handprints are one the smoking gun along with his wife's blood? Guess it's coincidental too that he had cookies on his computer for "how to murder" sites??????
Anyway, there will never be justice here. Two inocents are lost, and this loser will only do time at most. And I don't think he feels the least bit guilty. No one with a conscience could do this.
Posted by: Wolf | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 04:57 PM
This man has not been found guilty yet so he is still innocent. There is too much background to the story to assume his innocence. Why didn't the police discover the bodies on two searches of the house. Why did the fil use the gun the next day after many months of not using it. Why is he not pleading guilty under insanity. Too many questions to be answered. I just hope it wasn't him, surely he couldn't commit this crime.
Posted by: Donna | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 05:16 PM
Just another thought I read that he went round his in laws to use the computer everyday, who's to say he done all those searches on suicide? Was it him using the computer?
Posted by: Donna | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 05:18 PM
Neil Entwistle will not receive a fair trial in the United States of America. This is clear from the fact that the family of Rachel and lillian Entwistle are allowed to release statements assuming his guilt before it has been proven in a court of law.
And the language of the prosecuting authorities assumes guilt also:- "Some time on Friday morning Neil Entwistle shot Rachel in the head and then proceeded to shoot baby Lillian who was lying on the bed next to her mother". Who says this is what happened? A court has not proven this to be the case.
Maybe he is guilty and should be punished, but God help the innocent accused in this God foresaken country!
Posted by: matthew Green | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 10:06 PM
Why people do not wait until a jury condemns Neil Entwistle , or acquit him ?. He's pressumed INNOCENT, until being found guilty. I'm disgusted with all the media's frenzy about this case, the media already condemned him without facts. It's a sad spectacle to see the media appealing to people's emotions to catch more audience, more readers, more money
Posted by: Clarissa | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 11:46 PM
The media now with "outrage " has informed people about supposely Neil Entwistle looking on the net for adult sites, for scorts, sexual partners, to inflame more people's passions. Many married or single men look on the net for adult sites. That's common. So WHAT ? . I'm disgusted with all those sharks of the media going after Entwistle without having the facts, without having the verdict of a jury. Bunch of hypocrites !!.
Posted by: Clarissa | Friday, February 17, 2006 at 11:54 PM
Rachel Entwistle's family has already condemned NEIL ENTWISTLE. Neils's family is also in pain seeing their son in chains like an animal, CONDEMNED by the media's sharks already. I think t if Rachel Entwistle had some dignity, some appreciaion for the pain of other people, Neil Entwistle's parents, family, they should SHUT UP and wait until a jury judges him. All those little flowers taken to the court were cheesy spectacle to watch. I see already this young man already thrown in jail by a jury: he's BRITON, I cannot imagine all the jurors will look into the facts with an impartial mind like mine, for example.
Posted by: Clarissa | Saturday, February 18, 2006 at 12:03 AM
Hi All.
I am from the UK and I have been looking at some of the comments made about NE which some of them are outragious. In the UK a person is arrested by the police, if they are charged by the police they are held in a holding cell until they appear before a Magistrates Court and then held in Custody for a date to be fixed for a Trial in a Crown Court. It has never ever been known in the UK to publicsise Court papers so that they are on full view to the members of the public, before a Trial.
We do not do that in the UK, it is known as Data Protection Acts. There is another point too about the UK. The courts can ask for a ban on Media being present. They can serve an order for Media restiction. Why has this not been issued in the USA, and why has NE been covicted beofore a Fair Trial, Why has he not made a complaint about his court papers being shown before his Trial. (This is if the law is different in the USA). It will be up to the Courts to find all the evidence to put it to the Jury to make their decision of GUILTY or NOT GUILTY. This is where the UK people don't understand and this is why we are so confused between the different ways your country operate your laws.
Posted by: Tony | Saturday, February 18, 2006 at 04:04 PM