Frankly, I wouldn't think this was significant, but thought I'd clear it up from my perspective. At the link below to Hyscience, it appears to link to a news story addressing whether or not Beth Twitty was filming in Aruba during her recent visit.
ARUBA – “Absolutely nonsense”, is Beth Twitty’s reaction on the news reports about her being accompanied by a film crew of Paramount Pictures or other media during her stay in Aruba. She arrived in Aruba earlier this week accompanied by her girlfriend Carol.
What I found surprising was the denial given I was sent an image of her and others setting up to film outside of the office of Helen Lejuez, which I believe was the first night of her visit. It was a large image file and a bit blurry, so I didn't even bother posting it at the time.
I did reduce it, making the focus even worse, but clearly there was filming of some sort going on. Observers on the ground had actually reported it prior to my receiving the image. As I said, I don't see the big deal with it, really. But I thought I'd post the image to correct the record. I assume this was personal filming of some kind and not a network, and certainly not Paramount Pictures.


Beth Twitty is now claiming she doesn't have the money to search for Natalee if she is alive? WHAT? She can buy her son a Tundra and travel to Philadelphia to meet with her hoodlum friend, but she doesn't have the money to look for her daughter?
She doesn't want to find Natalee alive. That would mean the end to her celebrity status and the money.
Posted by: Jody | Nov 5, 2005 2:11:53 AM
she doesn't have it?? where di it all go??? another manipulation to get people to feel sorry for her and donate more....that woman was given enough money to search for natalee and every other missing kid in the world ..I wouldn't give her another penny
Posted by: truthbetold | Nov 5, 2005 2:17:50 AM
Surely there is no one who believes that Twitty did not know about the film crews.She orchestrated the whole deal.Wow,sure is sad to see so many being hoodwinked about the film crew fiasco.I mean it is no big.Who cares?It is no secret that Beth has become addicted to needing a camera around.She is delusional in her thinking that the public at large wans to see her on a daily basis.
Fact is the public only wants this to come to an end.It would be appropriate if she were to announce that she and the family endorse the interrogations of the Mt.Brook kids and chaperones in order to eliminate them as suspects.She and the immediate family should be interrogated as to squash those speculations as well.
Why is it that Beth continues to put roadblock after roadblock in the ALE pursuit of investigating this case?
Yes there is a sucker born every minute so yes sadly there will be even more people being scammed for their money all under the pretense of finding Nat.
The family has the money to search for their daughter,so stay away from the TV studios and start searching and dont go back to the studios until you have something of substance to inform the public of.
RUN JUG RUN
Posted by: bizman | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:02 AM
My impression of this picture is this:
It looks to me like they are all holding scripts.
Beth Twitty seems to be the "director" of whatever they are set out to film.
So this is what her agenda was going back to Aruba? Maybe it's to capture " film clips" for the Natalee Holloway movie?
My bad,I thought her trip to Aruba was for her to clarify her "statements", and to find out how the investigation was going in regards to her missing daughter Natalee.
Posted by: Donna | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:02 AM
Jody,
If you would get some sleep once in a while you may find a release from all the hate you harbor against Beth. Or do something else some time. Go out to dinner , visit family or friends if you have any. Or clean your house. I can imagine as much as you are on the internet posting your lies and sick comments about Beth and her family your house is surely falling down around you and needs some undivided attention to cleaning.
All the sick lies you post on the internet, words of hate and calling Beth names has consumed you to the point you need some serious mental counseling.
You have to be a sick person to hate someone you do not know.
Posted by: Skye | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:11 AM
My impression of this picture is this:
It looks to me like they are all holding scripts.
Beth Twitty seems to be the "director" of whatever they are set out to film.
So this is what her agenda was going back to Aruba? Maybe it's to capture " film clips" for the Natalee Holloway movie?
My bad,I thought her trip to Aruba was for her to clarify her "statements", and to find out how the investigation was going in regards to her missing daughter Natalee.
Posted by: Donna | Nov 5, 2005 11:02:32 AM
Why would anyone be interested in seeing a movie about Nat?I mean we have seen all of the dance videos and the brainless interviews for months now.There will have to be closure in order to have a good movie.Like Nat showing up and claiming to have been forced into the sex trade.
For some reason a two front approach is being presented.
Dr. Phil appearing on Leno and implying that Nat is alive in the sex trade.Beth with her arranged film crew in Aruba.Perhaps Beth and Phil know the outcome and are positioning the story for maximum profit.There is more here than meets the eye.The recent selling of his soul by Dave Holloway and him PARROTING Jughead(WE DELIVERED THE SUSPECTS ON A SILVER PLATTER).
All anyone has to do is say they are sorry and say they were under duress of the situation and then scurry away to count the money.
Resolution is near,the stage is being set.Chief Dompig has forced the change in direction of this case towards Alabama and the players in this sage are scurrying about to bring about a happy PROFITABLE ending to this story.
That could be why Beth will not allow herself to be interrrogated or her fellow Alabamaians.Yep the net widens and the catch will be plentiful when this is over with.
Again who would want to see a movie about this fiasco.WHY????
Posted by: bizman | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:12 AM
Do the Aruban officials think that Beth is not really looking for her daughter but is making these trips to Aruba for fundraising purposes?
Posted by: Captain Joe | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:13 AM
probably an investigative team from the united nations. or maybe part of a seal team doing preliminary scout work for the marine expeditionary force which was diverted from the middle east last week. who knows, who cares, where's natalee, who disappeared her, and who's trying to her other than her parents and friends.
according to their papers, the only thing the conference wanted to know from mrs. twitty was "what are you doing here", and "what do we have to do to stop you from badmouthing aruba".
well, here's the answers. l. she doesn't badmouth aruba. she badmouths the suspects and the inability of some in positions of power to find her daughter or even prove what happened to her. second question, nothing short of finding natalee and what happened to her is going to stop beth. or the family and friends who believe hers is a just cause.
too simple for them, too honest an approach perhaps. they'll just hire a few more hit mouths like harry tho and dayo gould to badmouth natalee and beth's efforts to find her. surely they realize by now how much that alienates even people who originally sympathized with their concerns.
Posted by: dennisintn | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:13 AM
Posted by: bizman | Nov 5, 2005 11:02:19 AM
Posted by: Donna | Nov 5, 2005 11:02:32 AM
Posted by: berry | Nov 5, 2005 9:14:52 AM
Just a few of the people who respond intelligently and clearly see the truth, I thought I was the only one, besides Dan of course.
Kudo's to all for saying it like it is!
Have you all noticed that each one of us who tell the truth about Beth and company are assigned a person to dog them and attempt to discredit us? One has to wonder why they are so obsessed with defending beth and company, it's just sick.
Posted by: Brooke | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:17 AM
Have you all noticed that each one of us who tell the truth about Beth and company are assigned a person to dog them and attempt to discredit us? One has to wonder why they are so obsessed with defending beth and company, it's just sick.____________
Brooke, it is you who is paranoid and delusional.
Here's a question for Dan. Why not develop some "credible people" in Holland to observe and interpret Joran's every move? After all, he is the prime suspect in Natalee's disappearance.
Oh, why bother. A grieving mother determined to find answers makes such an easy target.
Posted by: cadali | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:32 AM
Dan evidently doesn't listen very carefully. During the story about the film crew rumor, Beth herself said the local media showed up. Dan, more and more, sounds like an Aruban official trying to incite the people against Beth.
Posted by: katysmom | Nov 5, 2005 11:00:41 AM
Who needs facts though? A blurry picture showing a tripod is enough to prove Beth brought the ability to film with her, and thus show that she is lying when she says she didn't. Who cares that it could just as easily have been local media?
Posted by: Abram | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:38 AM
Dan, I am not sure the tripod tells us anything. It could have been a local reporter's camera tripod, it could be that there was some other activity going on during that timeframe that the tripod had been in use for, we just don't know. It is just a point of curiosity I suppose.
I do believe Beth and Dave are handling their grief differently and it is true that once you are in the limelight it is often hard to shed that limelight away from you (even if you don't invite it).
I do have a question though. Where has Jug been lately? We see Beth all about with various people, but Jug seems to have disappeared into the woodwork. I haven't seen her with him in quite some time.
Posted by: annie | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 12:08 PM
Have you all noticed that each one of us who tell the truth about Beth and company are assigned a person to dog them and attempt to discredit us? One has to wonder why they are so obsessed with defending beth and company, it's just sick.
Posted by: Brooke | Nov 5, 2005 11:17:47 AM
What truth, Brooke? You post an OPINION and nothing more. You have no more information or knowledge about the case than anyone else. If you think all the information the family and / or the authorities in Aruba know has been fully disclosed then you are sadly mistaken.
Posted by: Skye | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 12:18 PM
Brooke
Dave is agreeing with Beth. Better watch the news instead of just assuming! By the way, how long have you personally known Beth?
Posted by: mchenry | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 12:46 PM
I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS!!!!!!! You guys are absolutely pathetic - although seeing new names on this board makes me think it's been taken-over by teenagers.
But Dave, what's the deal with you?! I was a faithful follower of this website while the initial search in Aruba was happening. Everyone on this board, you (Dave)included, was amazingly supportive and empathetic toward Beth Twitty. So what's happened?! Have we all forgotten that this woman's CHILD is gone?!
I'm sorry but - no matter what - I would do ANYTHING to get my child back. And I am certain that appropriately enough, Beth Twitty couldn't give a rat's a$$ what all of you think of her actions.
Dave, I am terribly disappointed that the last several times I have visited your site you are bashing this pitiful woman at every opportunity.
You people ought to be very ashamed.
Posted by: bhammom | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 01:10 PM
bhammom--I think you meant to say 'Dan'.
Posted by: cadali | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 01:20 PM
I do have a question though. Where has Jug been lately? We see Beth all about with various people, but Jug seems to have disappeared into the woodwork. I haven't seen her with him in quite some time.
Posted by: annie | Nov 5, 2005 12:08:00 PM
Jug was told recently by the authorities in Aruba that they didn't like his 'attitude', and if it continued, they would stop the investigation (like they ever started). He has chosen to stay out of the way.
Posted by: katysmom | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 01:36 PM
Maybe, just maybe, Beth needed recorded proof of her dealings in Aruba - especially since things mysteriously go missing. I highly doubt she brought a camera crew for the MSM, I'm sure it was just a recording for her own records. After everything this poor lady has been put through, I can't blame her in the least. If you're trying to prove that she is lying, it didn't work.
Posted by: Shari | Nov 5, 2005 7:13:32 AM
___________________________________
I don't blame her for that - but don't lie and say you didn't bring a film crew, if that is the case. She probably would have been better served saying she didn't actually bring the crew, but did know they were there or coming - if she did.
Posted by: berry | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 02:20 PM
Berry, it sounds like you take the same pleasure in dogging Beth Twitty as Dan. Whether or not Beth was "forthcoming" about a film crew is supposed to be comparable to the behavior of the 3 boys who lied to police, family and everyone else about a missing girl? In the US that would be criminal.
And now Beth Twitty is supposed to be a lying crook because she said that searching South America for Natalee is more than she can accomplish? Aruba is a teeny little island. South America is a CONTINENT. Get it, Beth bashers? Of course not, that's beside the point, isn't it?
Posted by: cadali | Nov 5, 2005 10:03:46 AM
_____________________________________
Nope. Not a Beth Basher. But she does drive me nutz. BTW - thanks for the geography lesson. Duh.
Posted by: berry | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 02:31 PM
I can't believe anyone here thinks Beth et al has any motive other than to find out what happened to her daughter.
Posted by: blues | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 02:58 PM
I don't blame her for that - but don't lie and say you didn't bring a film crew, if that is the case. She probably would have been better served saying she didn't actually bring the crew, but did know they were there or coming - if she did.
Posted by: berry | Nov 5, 2005 2:20:43 PM
To the best of our knowledge, she hasn't lied about bringing a film crew. Dan claim's to be setting the record straight; yet nothing he has posted in this thread refutes or even really challenges the claim that Beth made in the article. There is bound to be media trying to get pictures of Beth, but that doesn't mean that they were working closely with her or that a film crew was following her around, per the article. It certainly doesn't justify the whole "she came with the ability to film" quote from Dan.
Posted by: Abram | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 03:15 PM
You people ought to be very ashamed.
Posted by: bhammom | Nov 5, 2005 1:10:25 PM
Yes only those who bash Beth should. Not those that bash Aruba and Arubans.
Posted by: roy | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 04:23 PM
I had a few bad experiences with a company. The first time on their premises I happened to have a camera. The second time I only had a few pics left on the memory card. The third time I didn't and I SO regret it. The fourth time I brought a video camera with me. I don't know how to use a tripod, so I did without one.
If I were Beth I would ALWAYS to the best of my ability tape every phone call and videotape or film any and every encounter I had in regards to NH. If I were Dave, I would do this as well. It is the best evidence you can have as to what is happening/has happened. Otherwise it is your word against another(s). When you finally understand that people aren't going to play fair with you, you realize you must document as much as you possibly can. In my case, where I gave the company benefit of the doubt after being mollified, I kept being burned over and over and not always by the same people. It was a lesson learned.
Posted by: justguessing | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 04:39 PM
Dan this whole Natalee case have to stop. We are tired from this, when you wont to bring the true, they bash on you. So, stop it. Natalee disapear, no proof of nothing, So everybody have to deal with it. And of discussion!!!!
Posted by: pearl | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 04:45 PM
Pearl,
Once Natalee's family finally gets some closure, then, and only then, will this story be over. If you're so tired of talking about it, then stop coming to these boards. We have the right to post here and support Beth in her quest for answers, just as you have the right to defend the boys. END of discussion.
Posted by: Shari | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 05:39 PM
Two things to remember: 1. A soldier volunteers to defend his country. A high school graduate on vacation in Aruba doesn't volunteer to disappear.
2. Beth said she would be glad for the Aruban police to talk to the Mountain Brook kids if the FBI could talk to Joran. I don't blame her at all. .
Posted by: punkingale | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 06:26 PM
Check out some of the latest Beth bashing articles and media releases-they have been translated and are posted on the web at:
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/,
the title to the web page is as follows:
(All the rest is their wording.)
ARUBA GETAGRIP
A COMPILATION OF TRANSLATED AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARUBAN MEDIA ARTICLES REGARDING THE NATALEE HOLLOWAY INVESTIGATION.
Beth Twitty has to come give a declaration once more and explain what is happening with the emergency fund of millions of dollars, according to Dompig
DIARIO Aruba
10/26/2005
ORANJESTAD(AAN): During an interview with Police Commissioner Dompig, he explained that the investigative team has invited Natalee Holloway’s mother, Beth Twitty to tell police more about the last contact she had with her daughter.
Dompig indicated that the mother has made her intention to boycott Aruba, while Natalee’s father has cooperated very well with the investigation.
The commissioner says that it is very lamentable that the mother prefers to have contact with police only through her lawyer or American ‘talkshows’.
He also explains that he fully denies to go on any talkshow to answer questions along with the mother.
In this way, the investigative team has invited Beth Twitty to come back to Aruba, to take her declaration again, seeing that there have been rumours around it, in which it was said that police in Aruba changed her declaration.
The investigative team also has different questions for the mother, about certain things surrounding this case, among others what is happening with the emergency fund that is available to them for this case.
The commissioner said that perhaps it’s difficult to ask certain questions, but they don’t have to lie to each other.
The case here is the mother's attacks on Aruba ending, so we are not afraid to ask certain questions.
Dompig indicated that he will ask the mother, what she did with the money that many people contributed with her, putting millions of dollars in a so-called ‘emergency fund’.
Another questions is: “ why doesn’t Natalee’s father have access to this money, when he has to ask for discounts here, like for example for his travel ticket”?
This is all he wants explained on the part of the mother of Natalee Holloway, because it’s part of the investigation. DIARIO asked Dompig if he has found any valuable tips.
The commissioner explains that every tip is assigned a number and if the tip results in being very good, the person can earn a reward, however the fund Dompig speaks of is a fund from people around the world, especially America, who have contributed with much money to help the family with expenses related to the case, that has now reached some million dollars.
According to Dompig, another important question is how this money is not used to help with payments of, for example, those who come to conduct searches in Aruba.
Commissioner Dompig showed as an example the tremendous work of Fred Golba made with his two dogs some time ago and explains that Golba wants to come back to continue searching.
Given that he is looking for funds to pay for his ticket and stay in Aruba to come search, how can he not find funds from the millions that Beth Twitty has from the fund?
This is also a very important part of the investigation. This because a case such as Natalee’s has different scenarios. One scenario is that a person killed Natalee, or for whatever reason she is no longer living.
Another scenario is that she is alive, but everything in the case is a ‘set up’, to profit in one way or another.
One possibility for example is that they said she is deceased, and they can collect the life insurance money, while in reality she is not deceased, but another way is that with collecting funds from people with good intentions that send money for the fund and the family enriches themselves.
If the mother gives information about how much money there is and how much money she is spending, he has no problem with this. However, if the mother has everything secret, this becomes part of the investigation because it puts the case in a different light.
DIARIO indicated that the more the mother appears on the programs, perhaps more money she finds for the fund. Dompig explains that the Task Force of Aruba, along with the government gave him the OK for him to go on the American live programs, but via telephone, for him to give the other side of the coin to what has happened and is happening with this case.
He explains that this has caused them to achieve a lot, seeing that America has said that at last Aruba is giving information, where they have started to look in another direction, to check other possibilities.
One of the possibilities for example, is that the three suspects are not guilty, or that they’re not the only guilty ones. Dompig explains that he is actually doing everything he can to find via the FBI the information that is missing about the group from America, more detailed declarations, so that they can exclude certain possibilities.
In no moment has Aruban police had a chance to exclude the group from Alabama in the investigation, because they left Aruba.
According to Commissioner Dompig he still has different important questions for the group, among others how they went to the airport if Natalee did not appear, and how they didn’t sound the alarm earlier than when they left, of those who where staying in the room with her.
While politicians are fighting for positions
Beth Twitty is active in Aruba, without any respect for local authorities
A.M. Digital
11/03/2005
Beth Twitty is back in Aruba and this time she brought a battalion of people of Paramount Pictures armed with video and audio equipment. Beth Twitty is back to continue with her negative campaign against Aruba. We understand that she is here to try to be present at the annual meeting of the Aruba Tourism Authority and the Aruba Hotel & Tourism Association with the North American Tour Operators. In that meeting Twitty has the intention to address the North American Tour Operators and tell them why she thinks that they should not continue to sell Aruba as a tourist destination. AHATA and ATA executives do not think that she can be present at this meeting just like that. Fact is that Beth Twitty is here to try to cause more damage to the image of Aruba and its authorities.
Does Beth Twitty think that she can come here whenever she feels like, harass us on our own territory, and expect that nobody does anything?
Our phones have been red hot since her arrival in Aruba. We have information that there is a group of people that will not hesitate to go into a direct confrontation with Beth Twitty of she tries anything of that sort again.
On the other hand the general question is why the Government is not doing anything about this person. The police already stated that they will watch Twitty very closely and the slightest violation of our laws will land her in jail if necessary.
END
Can you even believe the gall of those people???!! Now Beth is the perpetrator? I think Aruba needs a lesson about the good guys and the bad guys again and which is which. A brush up course on who gets invetsigated and prosecuted after a murder, i.e. the suspects, and not the people who assist in solving the crime, would probably be a good idea too.
Give me strength...........
Posted by: hockeygirl | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 09:15 PM
Wait! Have the Aruban police investigated the sandy knoll yet??????? Maybe they will once they're done with their conspiracy theory and Who Really Shot JFK books.
I know!....The CAMERA was on the sandy knoll.
Posted by: hockeygirl | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 09:22 PM
i have a few questions to ask regardless of your stance on this case and evidence (Dan, I have gathered this is your site, so your response would be much appreciated)...
would you be uneasy with your sister/daughter/or any female relative or friend going out on a date with joran or the kalpoes? would you be able to sleep until she came home? if she didnt come home, and one of these guys said they "left her" somewhere, would that sit well with you?
i am really curious as to what all the people who think that there is no reason to suspect these 3 of doing anything sinister.
please respond with your thoughts. thanks.
Posted by: i_suck_at_golf | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 10:34 PM
would you be uneasy with your sister/daughter/or any female (snip) , would that sit well with you?
The question has nothing to do with anything. Of course it would not SIT WELL with me - no matter who they were with given the circumstances.
But that wouldn't give me the right to accuse them of rape and murder w/o evidence. And that isn't a discussion I'm entertaining with anyone at this point. There is none. Period.
Posted by: Dan | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 10:43 PM
i appreciate the response. the reason i asked the questions was to get a sense for what people thought the character of these guys were. nothing that would point to guilt or innocence.
i have a sister who is about the age of these guys (with me being 2 years older and protective). i have a keen sense of guys i approve of and those that i do not. if i had my say, she would not be out with these guys. innocent or not. in a general sense IMO, they are bad news. take a look at the old tickle sites.
again, thanks for responding.
Posted by: i_suck_at_golf | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 10:51 PM
But that wouldn't give me the right to accuse them of rape and murder w/o evidence. And that isn't a discussion I'm entertaining with anyone at this point. There is none. Period.
Posted by: Dan | Nov 5, 2005 10:43:28 PM
Says who? Dompig said that at least Joran had admitted to a felony, so I don't see how anyone can say there is no evidence of such a thing. One certainly can't accuse Dompig of being one sided in this case, and he -- unlike you -- actually has access to statements. So your "no evidence" comment seems to be contradicted by people who actually do have information about this case.
Posted by: Abram | Saturday, November 05, 2005 at 11:10 PM
Dompig said that at least Joran had admitted to a felony
Posted by: Abram | Nov 5, 2005 11:10:46 PM
Can anyone post a link to MSM source showing that Dompig said that?
Posted by: George | Sunday, November 06, 2005 at 11:07 AM
Dave Holloway said months ago there is no life insurance policy on Natalee.
Posted by: mchenry | Sunday, November 06, 2005 at 10:48 PM
Boohoohoo to Aruba's trade industry.
I think Aruba needs a lesson about the good guys and the bad guys again and which is which. A brush up course on who gets investigated and prosecuted after a murder, i.e. the suspects, and not the people who assist in solving or investigating the crime, should be mandatory.
And talk about threats and people that live in glass houses...what does "go into a direct confrontation" mean? I don't know, but it sure doesn't sound good. And threatening to put Beth in jail?!!!! They need to stop smoking the drapes down there.
Wait a minute...I've got it: someone should get Joran and the "boys" to get on CNN and call for an Aruban boycott. THEN they'll get put in jail...!
Posted by: hockeygirl | Sunday, November 06, 2005 at 11:43 PM
It is a pity that the so called 'suspects', and their families, are listening to their lawyers about not saying anything to the public. They ought to come out swinging against all this muck that Beth Holloway and Co comes out with. What a load of spin!!!! Beth Holloway Twitty is able to say whatever she likes, and nobody ever seems to question what she is saying. She would not be allowed to do that here in UK, as the stuff she is pumping out would amount to a load of slander and if she had no proof, she would be prosecuted. Although these boys have been investigated and nothing has been found against them, she is still going around saying they have raped and murdered her daughter. It is unbelievable that she is getting away with it. There is absolutely no proof that Natalee is even dead!!!! In fact, you have got Dr Phil saying there is a good chance she is still alive! Watching Beth HT is like being at the mad hatters tea party. None of this is making any sense. She cannot definitely KNOW what happened to her daughter, and yet she is allowed to go around saying all this stuff. At the same time it is like she does not want to look at other reasons that Natalee may have disappeared, or to have the kids who were on the holiday with Natalee interviewed. Why??? What about the kid who says that Natalee was seen back at the hotel later on? Of course, that must be brushed aside I suppose. Well, maybe it would mean the so called 'suspects' would have to be discounted as the perpetrators of 'the crime'. As it stands there is not even any evidence that any crime was committed. Isn't it more logical that Natalee wanted to stay on the beach to watch the sunrise, or came back to find somebody who would go watch with her, or to contact somebody and then went and met them. Perhaps even with the intention of going for a swim. Were any towels missing? I notice that Beth Holloway is careful only to be making these statements in the US, she is too clever not to go spouting all this stuff in Aruba. If these guys are innocent, then this is a grave travesty of justice, as they are being tried by the media, and I just hope that if and when Natalee is found not to have been killed by these 'suspects', then there would be some way that Beth Holloway could be prosecuted, but I doubt it, that is why she is so confident in going around saying all this stuff without any proof at all.
Posted by: annie | Monday, November 07, 2005 at 01:11 AM
I read today that Joe Mamana (he's cute) is financing Beth's search for her daughter. Where is Jug? He seems to have dropped off the
radar.
Posted by: Dee41 | Monday, November 07, 2005 at 02:23 AM
BT supposedly received death threats. Maybe she
didn't mind the film crew or what ever they were
following her every move on Aruna.
Posted by: Dee41 | Monday, November 07, 2005 at 02:39 AM
And Dan is the host of this blog. He deserves
respect. It's awful the way some people critize
as tho its the right yhing to do.
Posted by: Dee41 | Monday, November 07, 2005 at 02:43 AM
Hey, that looks like my survey transit. I wondered where I left it!
Posted by: jimbeau | Monday, November 07, 2005 at 11:20 AM
One of the film crews that have been on the Island was with John Walsh of America's Most Wanted. He done a story on Natalee's case and all the things that are happening such as Tim Miller & Dave Holloway found somethings in the water, but they had to have permission to bring it up and Dompig would not return their calls. And the cross they found on the beach where someone seen a boat the night Natalee went missing with NH on it and beads around it. Also that alot of information his been given to Dennis Jacobs and the Aruben police but nothing has ever came of it. Maybe Dave should have ask how much money did they need in order to get Natalee back, then maybe we would already know where she was or what happened to her. As always God Bless Natalee and Her Families.
Posted by: Freebrid | Monday, November 07, 2005 at 04:09 PM
It's sad to read that some ppl that has never been to Aruba can give such comments about anything going on down here, when some truth are not posted for eveyone to see, but us down here. For example, the rooms for free that this family got, free rental cars, free food, free clothes, and using their(Beth and Jug Twitty) money to play in the casino, when they were not searching for Natalee. We feet verry bad about this situation, specially because it is the first time something like this happens down here. And yes i would also like to know where all the money of the funds went. Becouse she even got money from diffrent companies down here to help with the search. Isn't the family(most of the time) the first suspect in a case like this, in the Us? In Aruba it's not! The 3 guys that Beth wants in jail are not locals, 1 DUTCH boy and 2 from SURINAM, get it. She (Beth) also forgot to mention, she never showed up for her hearing the last trip she and her film crue made to Aruba. She could have brought the film crue to the hearing aswell... And She(Beth) just left the Island like nothing ever happend. Is Beth REALLY searching for Natalee, or does She know's where Natalee is right now and doesn't make an issue of the case anymore in Aruba??? How may ppl are lost in Alabama this year only? The Alabama police found them yet? FBI couln't find her, Ecu search couldn't find her, Ecusearh said to the local press "If Natalee is in Aruba, we would have find her". I hope you all know tha every medal has two side, a good one and a bad one. To bad Aruba is on tha bad side right now, but God never sleeps. And the truth shall come out. Aruba right now is STRONGER THEN EVER.... and as always you all are more than WELCOME to see for yourself that Aruba really is a "ONE HAPPY ISLAND"
Posted by: Joe | Thursday, November 17, 2005 at 08:10 AM
There is no substance to sustian the boycot against Aruba. There is no crime scene and no body. If this happened in the U.S. would it get so much attention?? Attention..maybe..but would it be justified? ....
The tape used on Dr. Phill to show that the Deepak brother is guilty is manipulated!!! Ooops, I think there's going to be a turn in this case. Using fake evidence to boycot Aruba?? Shame on you Beth!!
Posted by: Angellical | Wednesday, November 23, 2005 at 04:02 PM
I AM 100% sure she arrived with the camera crews and left with them.
Consider NBC and MSNBC personas non grata in Aruba! For doing this with her.
Posted by: Gigi Ola | Sunday, December 11, 2005 at 12:27 AM
Check out the last part of this article.
Good thing she didn't forget to mention her daughter!
http://impiousdigest.com/cblog/index.php?/archives/74-BREAKING-KATRINA-NEWS-Beth-Twitty-Okay!.html
Posted by: Tony | Friday, January 06, 2006 at 11:43 AM