Is Skeeters A Scavenger?

Frankly, I've lost my patience with what appears to me to be the bottom feeders in this case, including the media, who have surrounded a grieving Mother, told her what she wants to hear and perpetuated a fraud on the American public. Is former college cop Skeeters one? I don't know. But I do have my suspicions.

Below are two excerpts of private dick Jamie Skeeters on Nancy dis-Grace which might reveal his true agenda. First, listen to how he fooled Deepak Kalpoe into thinking he was supportive. Fair enough. But, then listen to him pronounce himself as old school law enforcement - then ask yourself, do old school LE types take their marching orders from the likes of Dr. Phil and Nancy dis-Grace? Sorry, I think not.

Even more astounding is the news which was ignored in his tape - he totally debunked another Jossy Mansur witness who claimed to have seen a burial at the dump. The very dump they go on to state many people were sick from, the same dump Natalee's Father climbed around on for days and days looking for his missing daughter. Isn't that news? Will it stop the cable networks from flaunting Jossy whenever he decides to hold court with an appearance as a credible journalist to maybe help out their ratings?

Of course not. That would be ethical ... professional .. and humane. Those would be the actions of someone who really gave a damn about Natalee Holloway - not a group of bottom feeding scum looking to feast on her likely corpse through another potential ratings extravaganza. As I have asked before, do these people not have any shame?

Listen to the tape - and think about it. You be the judge. Unlike some, I'm just here to convey the news.

Download skeeters_exposed.wmv

Comments

[QuickTime]

mosquitoes are a nuisance and are blood-suckers. They are also called skeeters.

[dugo]

Just a disposable tool. Poor sod.

[westcoaster]

Listen to the tape - and think about it. You be the judge. Unlike some,.................... "I'm just here to convey the news."

AHAHA... could have fooled me. Can you say scotch on the rocks? ;)

[26ANDCOUNTING]

He has integrity and credibility by releasing this tape on the Dr Phil show and not sending it to people who could actually do something about the supposed contents? He wants attention from the MSM.. He used MSM and respect in the same sentence. HAHAHAHA!!

[QuickTime]

http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/mad-science/dr-phil/

[nursemind]

mosquitoes are a nuisance and are blood-suckers. They are also called skeeters.

Posted by: QuickTime | Oct 18, 2005 3:33:53 PM
LOL!!! So true.

[Bigfish]

Good post Dan.
Bigfish

[Not a Hand Wringer]

Nancy Grace is a disgrace. Suitable only as pablum to fill the appetites of those who like their indignation appetites fed with over the top, one-sided and ill-informed rants from this bitter woman.

Most of these media whores are in competition with each other. They'd think nothing of using their own mother, if it increased their ratings.

None of them ( Grace, Dr. Phil, Geraldo, O'Reilly, and others ) have the journalistic ethics to report the news. They must cook the news into a stew of phony indignation...before feeding their one-sided opinions to a vacant audience that can't think for themselves. The goal of presenting this type of content, is this. This content adds valued points to their ratings because it attracts a large audience of dunces.

This same crew will then point to their show ratings, as justification for the types of 'reporting' they feed the dumbed-down audience.

Look O'Reilly will say. Look at my ratings. See how smart I am! See how smart my audience is for watching me!

As if attracting an audience of imbeciles validates anything.

[Brooke]

Everything about this case has been a fraud from day one when the vigilante group hit the island along with their leader Beth and entourage. She along with dis-mis-grace, Greta and all the other talking heads.

Really sick of the fakes and frauds and especially the
obsessed fans of BT and her little hubby the Jug!

[Justice4All]

Nope no hate here

[7thson]

This same crew will then point to their show ratings, as justification for the types of 'reporting' they feed the dumbed-down audience.

Look O'Reilly will say. Look at my ratings. See how smart I am! See how smart my audience is for watching me!

As if attracting an audience of imbeciles validates anything.

Posted by: Not a Hand Wringer | Oct 18, 2005 3:59:12 PM

WELL SAID, don't watch MSM myself, it's makes your brain atrophy.

[jgirl]

All of this bad publicity is only going to blow the case. The tapes could
not be admissible in court. Who can attest to the authenticity? Aruba tried to keep information secret to not hurt the case, so much is out there now, the Judges will probably throw anything out that the prosecution tries to
bring forth.

[splashtc]

Send Skeeters to Gitmo!

[dugo]

Aruba tried to keep information secret to not hurt the case, so much is out there now, the Judges will probably throw anything out that the prosecution tries to bring forth.
Posted by: jgirl | Oct 18, 2005 4:23:53 PM

You are confusing two things. Investigators often keep information secret until trial because it can harm the investigation and out of respect for the unconvicted suspect. Wether information has been public or not has no bearing on the admissability of evidence.

[Jan]

So in other words - he lures Deepak up to his room to show him how he has discredited the Jossy dump guy - and then Deepak trusts him and then of course he betrays Deepak - yep Skeeters is certainly the scum of the scum - and he said he waited a month - ok that puts it back in July - and of course it is now mid Oct - this is disgraceful - what a bunch of lowlifes!!

[lawbster]

i'm patient. i can wait til wednesday.

[Not a Hand Wringer]

Dugo, there is such a thing as disclosure, so investigators usually don't wait until the trial to drop bombshells on the defence.

Now, in Aruba it seems to be different and disclosure isn't as much of a factor in the 'suspicion' stage of a crime investigation....where suspects are held on suspicion of a crime.

Still...that's counter balanced in Aruba on strict protocols of what and how evidence/information get's released to the public pre-trial.

In either case...it seems that Skeeters has been negligient in how the taped interview has been handled from an evidentiay perspective.

[Sharon]

COMMENT: IS SKEETERS A SCAVENGER

RESPONSE: ASK THIS QUESTION INSTEAD: IS DAN A SCAVENGER... Dan you are so lost in your no-news nonsense why not just close down this sight...you have lost any direction for the truth and have no credibility!!! Hang up them spurs!!! the hunt is over!!! It is just a matter of time!!!

[Marilyn]

I think I might puke.

[TexasGal]

"private dick"....LOLOL too funny Dan!!

[paul]

not a group of bottom feeding scum looking to feast on her likely corpse through another potential ratings extravaganza

If not for the bottom feeding scum no one here including Dan would ever have said a word about Natalee Holloway. Because you would never have known. Without MSM blogs about "events" would not exist - how could they.

Quite a few blogs have benefitted by the overkill from MSM of this "story".

Many of these blogs owe their new found fame and
increase in readership to the MSM scum. Hmmm what does that make them.

A list of facts about this "case" is 30 lines maybe. This item here exceeds one hundred.

This is the same mentality that decries the "dumbing down of history" as taught in public schools today but refuse to acknowledge that the public schools of their day did the same thing. If you do not think this is a fact dig out your eighth grade world history book and find one mention of Russian defense at Stalingrad. Its not there. Its not in your kids history book either. Why not, cause they wuz commies and commies cant do anything good - just like MSM. But every US military academy, both government and private, studies Stalingrad as one of the most heroic, determined, and successful defenses in all the history of mankind. They make note in awe of the sacrifice the Russians made. And do not say they got US help. Not a penny was expended to assist Stalingrad, the Russians did it all themselves. "Not one foot back" was the command from Satlin - not one foot back was the fact accomplished.

Blogging vs. MSM appears to want the same kind of fact and history rewrite - just the blogs way.

Chillun please.

[Sharon]

THAT BAD BOY SKEETERS TRICKED THAT POOR INNOCENT DEEPAK ....JUST BECAUSE Deepak said Yes to the question "did all of three rape Natalie..." doesn't necessarily mean that he really meant it...maybe he was just kidding Skeeters, after all sometimes yes does not mean yes isn't that true Dan...and Deepak was co-horsed into saying Natalie was a Slut by Skeeters...bad boy bad boy Skeeters you made Deepak say a naughty....He never would have ever said that ...Deepak is so innocent that we can just put all the blame for Natalie's dissapearance onto Skeeters and this will give poor Deepak a break to breath, until the judge finds him guilty and then he finally swings in the breeze...!!! Dan you went off the deep end!
I am out of here!! THEY ARE GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY INCLUDING DADDY'O VANSLUT

[Not a Hand Wringer]

Well, is Dan a scavenger?

Hmmm....good question. Now the word scavenger usually refers to people that search through garbage for food. It also refers to animals that feed on the dead.

Now, what gain is there for Dan to feed on the dead? Hit's to his blog? Perhaps, but for what reason? There's no monetary gains at work here...

unlike say another Natalee forum of animals ( Monkeys ) that sells monkey-wares and generates ad revenue from it's website. Now are the Monkeys feeding on the dead so as to generate profits?

I'll let the readers decide.

Now, is Dan scavenging through garbage in search of food? No...

but, he may well be scavenging through garbage reported by some in the MSM in search of truth.

So, if Dan is indeed a scavenger with respects to the latter...I say bravo.

[Marilyn]

Sorry about the puke comment... not very constructive, I suppose. That man sickens me. He seems to have succeeded in totally screwing this case up more than it already was (if possible) after offering so much hope and getting everyone all hyped up again about this "shocking new evidence"... How slimy can he be? I may not understand all of the legalities, but his ethics stink from everything I have seen so far. If he told Deepak or anyone to "remember that I am going to be taping you every time I see you or talk to you from now on", it is easy to understand how a person with no obvious tape recorder could get an unsuspecting person to talk to him and not think there was a hidden tape or a computer on recording him! And then, to re-edit and piece the tape togehter to make statements appear to be different than they were intended... what a sham. He is a scam artist and the MSM fell for it completely! I think they still do! Now what???

[Marilyn]

THAT BAD BOY SKEETERS TRICKED THAT POOR INNOCENT DEEPAK ....JUST BECAUSE Deepak said Yes to the question "did all of three rape Natalie..." doesn't necessarily mean that he really meant it...maybe he was just kidding Skeeters, after all sometimes yes does not mean yes isn't that true Dan...and Deepak was co-horsed into saying Natalie was a Slut by Skeeters...bad boy bad boy Skeeters you made Deepak say a naughty....He never would have ever said that ...Deepak is so innocent that we can just put all the blame for Natalie's dissapearance onto Skeeters and this will give poor Deepak a break to breath, until the judge finds him guilty and then he finally swings in the breeze...!!! Dan you went off the deep end!
I am out of here!! THEY ARE GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY INCLUDING DADDY'O VANSLUT

Posted by: Sharon | Oct 18, 2005 5:10:37 PM

Farewell... You have no idea of what Deepak said to Skeeters about what. That is the point. The tape is altered, spliced, edited, etc. In other words, not believable. How do you know they are guilty, anyway? Are you privy to information that none of the rest of us are? Please do share.

[c]

Farewell... You have no idea of what Deepak said to Skeeters about what. That is the point. The tape is altered, spliced, edited, etc. In other words, not believable. How do you know they are guilty, anyway? Are you privy to information that none of the rest of us are? Please do share.

Posted by: Marilyn | Oct 18, 2005 5:20:49 PM

Because she said so, because Beth said so. I beleive in Beth.

;)

[Bitsey]

>>Dan you went off the deep end!
I am out of here!! THEY ARE GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY INCLUDING DADDY'O VANSLUT
Posted by: Sharon | Oct 18, 2005 5:10:37 PM<<

Your village misses you.

[Marilyn]

Because she said so, because Beth said so. I beleive in Beth.

;)

Posted by: c | Oct 18, 2005 5:25:02 PM

THANK YOU!!! I feel much better now! ;-)

[iwabwu]

I can't get the audio to work. Is it located somewhere else?

Thanks.

[westcoaster]

Your village misses you.

Posted by: Bitsey | Oct 18, 2005 5:27:23 PM

Please be kind, your comment was uncalled for.

[thelurkmeister]

- What nobody plugs is that a former patient of Dr. Phil has come forward to claim he sexually abused her in the early 1980's. She filed charges with the Texas State Board of Examiners and Psychologists, who reprimanded him in 1989 for "hiring the woman too soon after she was a patient," citing an inappropriate dual relationship. Dr. Phil took a lie detector test to prove his innocence - and he passed - but he "can't remember" exactly who administered the test......

You don't think - naawww!!

[thelurkmeister]

Please be kind, your comment was uncalled for.

Posted by: westcoaster

Oh, yes it was!! Sharon is a nut case.....

[Bitsey]

>>Please be kind, your comment was uncalled for.
Posted by: westcoaster | Oct 18, 2005 5:40:32 PM<<

I was being helpful.
I know you menopausal monkey hags miss it when one leaves to flirt with Dan.

[westcoaster]

Please be kind, your comment was uncalled for.
Posted by: westcoaster
Oh, yes it was!! Sharon is a nut case.....
Posted by: thelurkmeister | Oct 18, 2005 5:43:02 PM

*sigh* yes, I can see your reflection.

[westcoaster]

>>Please be kind, your comment was uncalled for.
Posted by: westcoaster | Oct 18, 2005 5:40:32 PM<<

I was being helpful.
I know you menopausal monkey hags miss it when one leaves to flirt with Dan.
Posted by: Bitsey | Oct 18, 2005 5:50:28 PM

LMAO...I think I've got my Halloween costume idea! Should I paint my face and neck red? hehe.

[DanRocks!]

Beth Twitty has not been truthful. I believe in Dan.

[micah]

Let's reserve judgement until we can read a "complete transcript" of the Skeeters/Deepak interview. The tapes were edited to format key segments of the conversation to Dr. Phil's show.
Although edited, I seriously doubt they were "falsified to incriminate" Deepak. Otherwise "The Dr. Phil Show" would have a huge lawsuit on its hands. McGraw has to maintain a level of integrity or the whole premise of the show goes bust. I have a sinking feeling that the conversation was authentic because of Deepak's body language (no amount of editing could mistake that). Deepak had just learned he was back in trouble and he was visibly fed up. Which doesn't make him guilty of rape/murder but it doesn't bode well for the chance that the tapes were faked.

[Letshelp]

I absolutely think if Skeeter had given the tape directly to Aruban police it would have 'disappeared' down the rabbit hole.

So what really is the problem with what he did?

He went public with the tape and then gave it to the FBI.

What is so horrible about that? How does that make him a scavenger?

And what about the question no one asks: How did this guy get Deepak to say more incriminating stuff than any of the so called Aruban and Dutch "expert" interrogators???

We don't know what Aruban police knew about the tape when it was made or whether they even actually bothered to request it until it appeared on American TV and created another mini firestorm.

There is NO REASON to believe the tape was 'doctored' to change the meaning of Deepak's comments.

[newswatcher]

>>Dan you went off the deep end!
I am out of here!! THEY ARE GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY INCLUDING DADDY'O VANSLUT
Posted by: Sharon | Oct 18, 2005 5:10:37 PM<<

Gee, Sharon! You say you are out of here every day but you just keep coming back.

Skeeters looks like a scum sucking bottom feeder...and this is his retirement package.

[Letshelp]

When is the last time Dan did anything but slam the family, the media and now Skeeter?

When is the last time that one of Dan's "sources" actually had some legitimate information or news on the case?

It has been a LONG, LONG time.

And that is why in my opinion Dan has turned on MSM and the family....because he's not getting the attention he thinks he deserves.

He is not only a scavenger and a bottom feeder but a spoiled brat who lashes out at people who don't do what he wants.

[DrTar&ProFeather]

Letshelp, if you dislike Dan, and his blog so much, then why in the world are you still posting here?

And Bitsey, thank you for that wonderful comment to another bottom feeder, SHARON. I will miss Sharon so much. The highlight of my day is always finding an all caps post spewing venom, and all in the name of Natalee. Yeah, sure.

[Jan]

Letshelp - may I suggest a trip over to the Monkeys - seems like that is where you belong!!

Dan has changed him mind on a lot of things on this case - wow how refreshing to have someone honestly reporting on it - not just following the Yellow Brick Road and the Twitters!

[a..incanada]

Well, great post Dan.
Skeeters and the blessed media he loves so much, same pile....well you get the gist.

[iquitos]

people who curse the three suspects for not telling the truth in the first days and causing valuable time in finding natalee (the HI lie) should also criticize Skeeter sna his cohorts for not getting this info to the cops immedately after they got it instead of profiting from it first. they could have profited from it later. they could have kept a copy and leked it out. they chose broadcast and profit over providing possible evidence against the three. sad part is the missing girl's mother played along since word has it she was in with skeeters and wood (jossy) from the gitgo. i think they sold the package to phil phd rather than phil hiring them. wood was working for jossy before he was working for phil. dirty business indeed. and in plain sight. you have to chose between effective prosecution and having your face all over the tube 24/7.

[a..incanada]

Iquitos, agree with you extremely. This is so frustrating for many of us that want justice. The numbers are growing, though, in support against the slimeballs(media, Phil and all the money mongers).

[scubajap]

i'm patient. i can wait til wednesday.

Posted by: lawbster | Oct 18, 2005 4:53:55 PM

Why? what are you expecting to happen on Wednesday?

[scubajap]

And what about the question no one asks: How did this guy get Deepak to say more incriminating stuff than any of the so called Aruban and Dutch "expert" interrogators???
Posted by: Letshelp | Oct 18, 2005 6:16:21 PM

Maybe because he DIDN'T get him to say "incriminating stuff" he only cut and pasted it together to make it SOUND like incriminating stuff. That is the whole point of this discussion, isn't it?

[Bitsey]

>>Maybe because he DIDN'T get him to say "incriminating stuff" he only cut and pasted it together to make it SOUND like incriminating stuff. That is the whole point of this discussion, isn't it?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 18, 2005 8:04:52 PM<<

Then again, maybe 'ol Skeeters slipped Deepak a drug? We know Deepak did not CONSENT to the recorded interview. Oh, the irony.

[!]

All of them are just doing there jobs trying to make a living like the rest of us. You can always change the station if you do not like what you hear or see.

[VASteve]

Your village misses you.

Posted by: Bitsey | Oct 18, 2005 5:27:23 PM

Please be kind, your comment was uncalled for.

Posted by: westcoaster | Oct 18, 2005 5:40:32 PM

I thought this was cute.