Are You Afraid?

People from all over are sending images to this website telling the world in general and pathetic islamofacist thugs in-particular "We're Not Afraid."

Updated: But just to keep things fair and balanced:

Terrorists Have  Problems  Too!

And I bet you didn't know this terrorizing former dictater is a dancer. Crank up the volume for that one.

Comments

[!]

That is pretty impressive ! I love it!

[jhon]

to tell you the truth, i AM kind of afraid... how could one NOT be?? (especially living in the city)

[georgia boy]

Thanks Dan and happy B-day. That's one of the coolest things I've seen!!!

[birminghamgal]

>>>>>>>>>>>>

[birminghamgal]

N O T A F R A I D >>>>>>>>>>>>

[iremember]

what a great site
god bless the UK

[grimer11]

YEAH!!!!!......we're behind you tony "bright eyes" blair and "nukular" george w. bush!!!!.....wait a minute....what the fuck am I saying?....THEY planted those remote controlled detonated bombs in the u.k (pakistan east), and demolished the WTC with 3000 tax slaves of the 'kwa in them.........the WHOLE world knows these sinful "governments" are murdering their own citizens and blaming the mythical al-CIAda (aka Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984)...

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/orwell_goldstein_1984.html

apparently all of mankind is caught in a never ending, unfortunate history loop and held hostage by a cadre of atheistic, traitorous lunatics.

[grimer11]

THESIS-ANTITHESIS-OUTCOME........it is the OUTCOME which is often first decided upon.

The Hegelian Dialectic

The dialectical method of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) consists of two main steps: the invention of artificial extremes (``thesis'' and ``antithesis'') which superficially conflict with each other, and the synthesis from that conflict of a goal, which is made to appear to be the product of consensus. The artificial extremes are chosen and propagandized (marginalizing the population) in such a way that the goal is naturally synthesized from them. It is, essentially, a trick - a fraud. It is a strategy of ideological divide-and-conquer. The dialectic ruse dissipates the energy and coherency of its targets - unless they recognize the ruse as such. Another caveat of the Hegelian dialectic is that few if any of society's members are earnestly loyal to the synthesis (they are still attached to the dialectic poles, and the synthesis is only a heartless concession), so it cannot be sustained (and destructive confrontation cannot be inhibited) without an over-powerful central state to enforce and sustain the synthesis through threats and artifice.

Hegel was a fountain of awful ideas, liberally cribbed by Marx and Engels, by the sickly and neurologically defective Mary Baker Eddy (founder of the Church of Christ, Scientist, which - as evidenced by its concept of ``Malicious Animal Magnetism'' - is in fact similar to Scientology), and by the Unitarians (who are historical proponents of universal government schooling in pursuit of socialist indoctrination). Hegel was an influence on famed phenomenologist Martin Heidegger (1889-1978) (NSDAP#3125894, 1933-May-1) (author of Being and Time (1927) and a critic of Hegel's methods), on French existentialist phenomenologist and Marxist Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) (author of The Transcendence of the Ego (1937) and Being and Nothingness (1943)), and on ``spiritualist'' utopian Marxist philosopher Ernst Bloch (Das Prinzip Hoffnung (The Principle of Hope)).

A central precept of the Hegelian ethic is that people are principally motivated by the desire to receive the approval and recognition of others, and to avoid their disapproval. Since this motivation is not predicated on the reasonableness of that approval or disapproval, the principle is a mechanism by which an individual delegates arbitrary control to others. This is, obviously, an enabling principle of collectivism. By encouraging people to embrace this tendency, and amplify it into a preeminent mechanism of decision making, Hegelianism works directly to subvert the individual.

Here is a telling excerpt from Critical Theory and the Limits of Sociological Positivism, an essay by Marxists George N. Katsiaficas (UCSD) and Mary Lou Emery (Stanford):

The methodological basis of the critical theory of society is the dialectical logic of George F. Hegel (1956). According to the principles of dialectical logic, ``That which is cannot be true,'' (Marcuse, 1941).

[...]

Other scholars have referred to the critical theory of society as Hegelian/Marxism, or dialectical Marxism (Klare and Howard, 1971).

In the above, one can already recognize the denial of facts, the general relativism, the very rejection of reality, that is the hallmark of the cryptomarxist liberal.

A Hegelian dialectic can be called a ``triple-false dichotomy'' - three lies that jail. A triple-false dichotomy is an ostensible dichotomy between two artificial, i.e. false, extremes, which are not in fact diametric in consequence (that is, the third falsehood is the precept that the extremes are related dichotomously). Each extreme is nonsensical or otherwise morally void, and by causing rhetoric to be dominated by ostensible adherents of these extremes, those exposed lose some or most of their capacity to reason about the topic. The most frightening, insidious way that reason is subverted is this: a dialectical environment is one in which the synthesis is something like a geometric bisection of the positions of two roughly equally extreme (and irrational) poles. In this environment, people at the poles (most people) fear to venture toward forthright support of a rational middle ground (solution, as distinct from synthesis) because they expect the synthesis to then be skewed in the direction of their polar opponents. People are locked at the poles and unwilling to openly discuss the domain of the solution, expecting such discussion to be interpreted as weakness, with the result that the synthesis has free reign and the solution has little chance to be realized.

Sometimes one of the two dialectic extremes is sufficiently absurd in the present cultural context that it has no adherents, and is employed only as a rhetorical tool.

A very familiar example of a dialectic is the Mac vs. Windows question. Amusingly, there is even an evident liberal loyalty to the Mac and conservative loyalty to Windows. Both of these operating system families are essentially bad. If you synthesize the two, producing an operating system exhibiting characteristics of both parent operating system families, you still have an essentially bad operating system. If you want to solve the problem and enjoy operating system reliability, security, performance, flexibility, and versatility, you run Unix - the nominally unpopular, nominally esoteric, largely unsupported third option. The sheer number of people who have rejected the Mac-Windows dialectic and adopted Linux (7.5m-10m according to the Economist 1999-Feb-20) is producing a demand many software houses can't and don't ignore. The establishment cannot enforce dialectics on software because of its ethereal mobility, and because of first amendment protection in the US and similar protections in other countries. Also observe that Microsoft has now invested in Apple, yet Apple's next generation operating system (``Darwin'' a.k.a. MacOS X) is a dialect of Unix (based on BSD 4.4) - with systsms software, Hegelian synthesis does not work, and only that which works can survive.

In the realm of public elections, however, the situation is quite the opposite. The establishment can and does enforce dialectics, shredding morale and integrity. In popular voting and in legislatures, there is a 50% threshold for approval, an artificially low threshold subject to flittering and hysteresis, ideally suited to manipulation by the dialectical method and by the mass media. The winner-take-all model is an obviously corrupt principle, in which the intent of those voters who voted against the victor are ostensibly represented by the victor, who then claims to command the authority not just of those who voted for him, but of all those who were eligible to vote for him. Since most of any large population - 60%, 70%, or higher - consists of people of ordinary intelligence, preoccupied with the mechanics of making a living in a specialty disconnected from politics, centralized control of a mass media apparatus can always be translated into dictation of who is elected (this centralization of control is detailed in the media chapter of my compilation). Finally, the two-party system is a prima facie dialectic, perpetuated by the mass media apparatus, and permitting a second major form of centralized electoral control by controlling who is eligible to run under the banner of one of the two politically subsidized perpetual parties. In short, this is a tyrannical oligarchy, masquerading as a tyranny of the majority, masquerading as a democracy, masquerading as a representative republic.

[grimer11]

APOLOGIES TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ABOVE POST.....HERE IS THE LINK

http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/intro2.html

[Rhod]

The clouds have parted and it's all so clear to me now.

[grimer11]

im glad rhod.....feel free to expound.......I'm heading out to chase some tail.

[!]

May God Bless the people of London England and their wonderful leader ~Tony Blair~

May God Bless America and all its people
and May God Bless our "President" ~George W.Bush~

God Bless all the other people in the world
and their leaders as well, as we all together
work to remove the coward thugs that try to
case harm to others from the face of the earth!!

[grimer11]

the world knows tony blair needs to be assassinated......for openers....I also feel the comic-book evil JEW charles krauthammer (yeah, the guy who cant wipe his own asshole with his own hands) should be thrown out of a building and hung by his wheelchair's cord should recieve his chosen end...........that guy is begging to die.

[grimer11]

oh man, I will tell you what....."bibi" netanayu deserves DEATH.....and..
israel delenda est.

[!]

http://www.werenotafraid.com/images/033/index.php

3rd row next to the last..

THE BIG FOOD SPREAD. Come on over and we will chow down.!!! Do not be afraid to enjoy a damn good meal with nothing to fear. :O)

[!]

grimer11

One sick puppy you are !!! how shameful.JERK!!

[Jeremy]

Here's something that's pretty creepy: Ever watch the video footage of the collapses of the Twin Towers and WTC # 7 on 9/11? Well, it's been almost four years now and it's long overdue that we take a look at 9/11 with dispassionate, realistic, analytical eyes. I invite everyone here to watch the video footage of the collapses and you can plainly see that they are controlled demolitions. You don't have to be a demolitions expert or an enginner to see the explosions, they are clearly visible as are the "squibs" of dust jetting out of windows near the blasts, and watch as each building comes down in nine seconds [more than ten floors "collapsing" per second!!], a feat impossible by the laws of physics UNLESS explosives were used to disintegrate everything holding the buildings up, i.e. a controlled demolition. The "official" 9/11 story is a far-fetched lie. See for yourselves:
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/#videos
http://www.globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=523
http://www.reopen911.org/pictures_and_videos.htm#Painful
http://wtc.macroshaft.org/mov/
http://www.wtc7.net/
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Sept11Videos.shtml

[Jeremy]

"Nineteen hijackers with plastic knives" didn't do this. They didn't cause the Air Force to be totally useless on 9/11 either. They didn't cause the Pentagon to not even fire a single surface-to-air missile in its own defense either. "Al Qaeda" didn't somehow get American courts to issue gag orders prohibiting surviving N.Y. firefighters from talking about anything they saw, heard or felt on 9/11, and "Al Qaeda" didn't get the F.A.A. air traffic controllers on duty that day to be under a similar gag order. "Al Qaeda" didn't order all the steel debris from the WTC to be quickly shipped off to China and India to be melted down (destruction of evidence).

[Jeremy]

"Al Qaeda" did not put GPS locators on each semi hauling the steel debris to the scrapyard to be shipped overseas so that if the truck drivers stopped along the way to drop off a "souvenir" they'd be immediately fired. "Al Qaeda" didn't plant the passport that magically "survived" the 'collapses' and "intense" fire we were told incinerated passengers, plane and even the plane's 'black boxes'. "Al Qaeda" didn't tell the newsmen covering 9/11 to honestly say in astonishment that the Twin Tower collapses appeared to be controlled demolitions. "Al Qaeda" didn't tell the eyewitnesses who saw the plane hit the South Tower to say they saw no windows on it. "Al Qaeda" didn't tell CNN's Jamie MacEntire to say that the Pentagon crash site didn't look like an airliner crashed there. "Al Qaeda" didn't allow Bush to handpick all the members of the 9/11 whitewash commission and allow Bush to dictate the rules of it and its scope and focus.

[Jeremy]

Face it: 9/11 was an inside job.