Democrats cautiously welcome Iraqi elections
One can only imagine the cooing from the left if Kerry had managed to win the past election and position himself to take credit for the recently held election in Iraq. I don't care what your political stripe, if you can't see anything purely and must make all judgements based upon the political angle, devoid of principle, then you don't have the integrity to be a good leader.
If Kerry were elected, I wouldn't have been surprised if he delayed the elections just to let the UN and Europe get their heads back in the trough before they took place. The man and his party in general offer no practical positive vision for the world, whatsoever.
I can just imagine this idiot at one of George W's Frat parties back at Yale. "Well, it's an OK party, but, um, that keg's eventually going to run dry, yanno." Idiot!
John Kerry: "It is significant that there is a vote in Iraq," "But ... no one in the United States should try to overhype this election.
"This election is a sort of demarcation point, and what really counts now is the effort to have a legitimate political reconciliation," Kerry said. "And it's going to take a massive diplomatic effort and a much more significant outreach to the international community than this administration has been willing to engage in.
"Absent that, we will not be successful in Iraq," he said.


You've said it best! I'm happy for the Iraq voting population and hope the results are popular. I watched "Kerri" - haven't decided who's the biggest "surface" idiot - Barbi - Teddi or Kerri - sounds a little "preppi" to me ;-D
Posted by: chrys | Monday, January 31, 2005 at 12:21 AM
Is there a man more dead and dried than John Kerry? Even the putrescent Kennedy has a certain interesting madness, but Kerry has the vitality of a mummy. Massachusetts has a lot to answer for.
Posted by: Rhod | Monday, January 31, 2005 at 07:18 AM