Link: Who cares what I think?
Well, she asked for it, sorta.
I mean, look at it this way. (If you don't mind, that is.) It's true that people on my side of the divide want to live in a society where women are free to choose and where gay relationships have civil equality with straight ones. And you want to live in a society where the opposite is true.


Yeah, you're right. I guess if women have the right to legal murder then we should all have it. And since we no longer want those depressingly oppressive ten commandments, and since there is no other "reason" not to kill someone, heck, you go ahead and kill someone; I won't tell. Try taking the unborn from a bear or lion sometime. It's a shame animals care more for their young than pro-choice women. As for queer unions. Sure, why not. But since that is okey dokey I guess you won't mind the union between a 50 year old man and a twelve year old girl? They love each other and only want to do what they do in the privacy of their own bedroom. They have rights. And since we don't want to alienate the animal loving folks, I think we should just go ahead and allow Ace to unionize with the Llama guys.
I grew up when abortion and queers were taboo. I remember the coat hanger abortions and the sprite douches. I remeber when men married someone they had given a life to grow in their womb. Being queer is now being gay. I still haven't figured out the segue there. Maybe they're happy being out of that closet they had to hide in. Maybe they're ashamed of the fact that they are socially unacceptable to a majority of the people in this world. Bottom line here (end of rant warning in 5...4...3..) is quit trying to force your LIFESTYLE on my rights.
Posted by: Ron | Sunday, November 07, 2004 at 10:51 PM
Is this person indicating that they're presenting a "false-front"?! Hmmm?! Do you feel this way? I like the phrase "not forcing"?! Last time I looked - a lot of what this country was built on and admired by the majority is being "forced" away by the "LEFT". Does "Am I Blue" indicate her true morals, seems she's the one in doubt? - or is she happy destroying and replacing with agreed upon majority unacceptable morals being "forced" by small interest groups.
Posted by: chrys | Monday, November 08, 2004 at 12:59 AM