« Bush Supporters Racist? | Main | Kerry/Edwards Score Big with Crossover Voters »

Thursday, September 30, 2004

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d83457449869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Post Debate Debate:

» Post-Debate Wrap-Up... We Called It! from Generation Why?
George W. Bush mopped the floor with John Kerry. Kerry did try to make it difficult for Bush to respond by simply not answering the questions asked. Bush showed he's a straight-talking, no-nonsense leader who has core convictions and sticks to them, ... [Read More]

» http://www.allahpundit.com/archives/001037.html from Allah Is In The House
The Commissar e-mails to say "Kerry on points, but he needed a knockout." RLS agrees: "Kerry has drawn no blood tonight and he is the one who had to." More to come as people weigh in. If you want your... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

YOU'RE QUICK - - I'm still assembling thoughts!! You're RIGHT of course!!

YOU'RE QUICK - - I'm still assembling thoughts!! You're RIGHT of course!! CORRECT also on the fact that the questions seemed written in favor of KERRY to make statements while BUSH's questions where pro-Kerry also!

I was astonished by how similar last night's debate was to the 2000 debates. Kerry/Gore, so polished and forceful. Bush, so fumbling but sincere.

What is the obvious implication?

c:

If the nation wants to elect an anchor person, Kerry's the guy. He can mouth whatever he and his people believe is the "right" thing to say. If the nation wants a leader and looks at this debate for it's substance, to me, Bush is the clear winner.

Kerry dissed Putin, already dissed Allawi, and gives praise to the UN and Global approach, in the face of known scandals and backdoor deals that show that route is a dangerous one for our own national security. And Kerry's N. Korea approach is a rehashed Clinton strategy that didn't work. It got us to where we are today.

My concern is, is the electorate mature enough to make these distinctions? I'd like to think so, but it is the same electorate that fired Bush Sr. for a guy who was so obviously flawed from the start.

Dan

Dan,

Clinton had something waffle doesn't: character.

Because you conservatives love Bush's right-wing policies so much and voted for him then:

1. Let your son be drafted, sent to Iraq and be killed as Bush/Cheney cannon fodder, not mine.

2. Let your money go to Washington to pay for the giveaways to the corporations, the rich and the evangelical churches, don't take mine.

3. Let you be the one to invite the government into your bedroom to enforce their "moral" views, not into mine.

4. Let the government take away your freedom of Religion, not mine.

5.Since you cosidered Saddam more dangerous than Bin Laden, when Al Qaida does another terrorist attack, let it be your family who is killed, not mine.

If you right-wingers don't stop forcing your views down other people's throats, you're gonna
get what you seem to love most - war and violence - but it won't be "over there".
Get ready for civil war 2 - I for one, would rather die fighting then submit!
"Give me liberty or give me death!"

A Patriot.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad