Audio: Levin, Blogs Expose Allred Accomplice In Whitman Smear While AP Pleads Ignorance
As first noted in a post from September 30, Mark Levin pressed Gloria Allred on his radio show (initial audio), forcing her to expose the name of self-professed Progressive attorney, Mark Van Der Hout, who is apparently working in conjunction with Allred to produce an extremely dubious political smear on Meg Whitman. Additionally, blog Weasel Zippers has since followed up with still more on the radical Leftist and UN Narc Mark Van Der Hout.
As noted at the very beginning of the audio clip below, excerpted from Mark Levin's show last night, as recently as yesterday, the AP was pleading ignorance, having no idea who Allred's accomplice was. That, despite it having been public knowledge for days thanks to Levin's radio show and blog research. Van Der Hout only now seems to be sticking his nose out from under a rock via a new report in the San Francisco Chronicle this morning.
In the audio below, Sean Hannity joins Mark Levin a few minutes in and Levin also calls for an investigation as to how two Leftist lawyers not known to represent run of the mill illegal aliens teamed up to launch an obvious partisan political attack against Meg Whitman just prior to November's election for Governor of California. Both attorneys now seem to have exposed their mutual client to possible felony prosecution for fraud and deportation. In a press conference yesterday, Allred tried to backtrack by not revealing Van Der Hout's name, despite her being on tape having already revealed it under pressure from Mark Levin.
Van Der Hout, one of the city's pre-eminent immigration lawyers and a self-proclaimed progressive, told us Tuesday that Diaz was referred to him several weeks ago by a fellow attorney. He wouldn't identify the attorney.
"I think someone referred her to Gloria on the matter of her hours and back pay as well," Van Der Hout said.
But again, no names.
What followed was a series of meetings, after which Diaz "ultimately made the decision to go public," Van Der Hout said.
Van Der Hout said he has had "no contact whatsoever" with gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown or anyone else from the Democratic Party.
Van Der Hout, who was at Diaz's first news conference last week in L.A., declined to say who is paying his fee for trying to win legal status for the ex-housekeeper – or even if he is charging one.
He also declined to say how Diaz has supported herself and her family since leaving Whitman's employ in June 2009.
As for whether it was smart for Diaz to go public, given that she's an illegal immigrant, Van Der Hout said, "People choose a variety of ways to let the immigration bureau know their status."
Asked if the feds had called since she went public, Van Der Hout said: "I can't say."
Levin/Riehl do the heavy lifting for the GOP AGAIN. I am convinced that much of the hate directed at you guys (from so called conservatives) is nothing more than penis envy.
Not hating Dan, quite on the contrary, cheering and backing him up every step of the way. That hound can really hunt!
The two facets of grassroot small-c, fiscal conservative and social conservative (by default:-fiscal con) are power momentum in reality beyond anyone’s denial (exception of die hard RINO & progressive). These two streams are not mutually exclusive in present and historical fact. Constitution founding principle & core values of small-government, of faith, hope, charity and in God we trust are both mutually inclusive and relevant (not preaching Beck’s gospel but the original founding principle).
We need to embrace and incorporate both power dynamics, not to venture wayward, not distinguishing friends from foes to attack, diminish and discredit the genuine grassroot movement which will change the landscape of the nation’s political history we hope.
Common goal to shrink the size of big government run amuck and perhaps, downsize our football-field ego (speaking for myself only).
Allred was interviewed again this morning on KABK and was asked about her refusing to answer Whitman’s question yesterday while on Hannity about who is paying her and how Diaz is supporting herself through all of this. She uncharacteristically (surely she knew she was going to be asked this and should have had a prepared answer) hemmed and hawed and never answered the question (not that interviewer Peter Tilden, Hollywood airhead, pressed her very hard). She quickly changed the subject to bring up another ex-employee who is now coming forward to claim that Whitman is “cheap and mean”. Yeah, that’s gonna hurt.
It looks to me like Allred was completely unprepared for this. Now she has come up with another former Whitman employee who claims that Whitman is cheap and mean. ($23/hr for housekeeping is not exactly cheap and “mean”? What is that?) Get ready for the “vast right wing conspiracy” care any minute. This NEVER happens to her. She is a trapped animal and her defense will likely be vicious and libelous.
Correction, that should have been KABC, not KABK.
Allred the twaddling gift that keeps giving. Any truth to the fact that Allred attemped to discredit Scott Brown during election?
Does any of this change the fact that Whitman employed an illegal alien for nine years?
Tactical error on Allred to have Levin nuclear Tomahawk on your case.
This is not a legal court case per Allred, what then, is the point? to discredit and frame a political candidate at election time? a pattern all too familiar?
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell says illegal immigrants do essential work in the U.S. and that he has firsthand knowledge of that – because they fix his house.
Van Der Hout and Allred should probably investigate Collin Powell for the social justice of undocumented workers.
Defunct Alinsky playbook has served its time, been called out and called bluff too many times in this election, defeated in the court of public opinion.
Unintended consequence on the left network now to lament the refusal of political candidates to render them interview coverage. Why continue to feed the hands that bite you?
Broadcast media landsacape have now changed to blogging news media and FNS.
I gotta hand it to Allred: We have here a rare case of liberals actually giving two shites about illegal immigration.
Barfo if she hadn’t you’d accuse her of racism
barfo: It’s obvious to all but fence posts Allred waved a document around from the SS Administration (note, that could not be used in immigration proceedings under penalty, which is what Allred has been pushing, while claiming it’s for unpaid items while employed). Ergo, slowly, she had been checked regardless of agency claims. Are you saying they should have axed her seven years ago after receipt of a letter that didn’t say either way?
logprof: Not really, they outed her. In fact, the agency may be investigated if they were ‘lied to’ by a couple of other clients… as in, are they providing the fake documents or where is their proof re: checking status.
So are the ‘compassionate’ dems saying no one should employ illegals? If I were a republican, that’s what I would have jumped on.
This information is some of the best I have found on this topic for me, I would like to appreciate your posting style, it’s really good, keep it up…
very good information,thank you