TIME magazine ends debate on the war in Afghanistan?
Leaving Afghanistan: "Zohal
Sagar lost her father and two brothers in the war. Her mother hopes they can leave Afghanistan and find a new life in Canada," TIME captions this bitterweet image of one of the innocent victims of war. But it gets oh so much worse. Their cover image will haunt you forever unless you're a moral relativist like Editor Peter Stengel, who makes a point of assuring us he isn't taking sides (see below).
By Sissy Willis of sisu
"We do not run this story or show this image either in support of the U.S. war effort or in opposition to it," protests TIME
Managing Editor Peter Stengel, sending the moral relativist's "secret signal"
even as he has decided to go ahead and publish what's got to be the best
argument ever — the image itself — for staying the course in Afghanistan:
Our cover image this week is powerful, shocking and disturbing. It is a
portrait of Aisha, a shy 18-year-old Afghan woman who was sentenced by a
Taliban commander to have her nose and ears cut off for fleeing her
abusive in-laws. Aisha posed for the picture and says she wants the
world to see the effect a Taliban resurgence would have on the women of
Afghanistan, many of whom have flourished in the past few years. Her
picture is accompanied by a powerful story by our own Aryn Baker on how
Afghan women have embraced the freedoms that have come from the defeat
of the Taliban — and how they fear a Taliban revival.
Asked for comment on the plight of women in Afghanistan — presumably
not yet having seen TIME's cover portrait of Aisha — former National
Organization for Women President Ellie Smeal had this to say, according to a Washington Times report:
The future of Afghan women "has just dropped out of all public discourse. What happens with females over and over again is we're forgotten."
Caption from our June 2 post "An increasingly impotent chattering class of credulous Chris Mattewses": "Palin isn't a feminist — not in the slightest," huffs card-carrying postmodern feminist Jessica Valenti of the blog Feministing,
stumbling inadvertently onto the truth that will soon send her and her
sob sisters tumbling into the dustbin of history: "What she calls 'the
emerging conservative feminist identity' isn't a structural analysis of patriarchal norms. It's an empty rallying call to women who are disdainful of or apathetic to women's rights."
Try telling that to Sarah Palin and her Army of Mama Grizzlies, Ms.
Smeal. Woman as victim? That's SO yesterday. "She's playing the "woman
card," notes Tuck. Yet more proof if needed that postmodern feminists are on the wrong side of history.
Our friend Peter Ingemi of Da Tech Guy's Blog has action steps:
Note. Despite its bad press under the recent ramming down the
nation's throat of ObamaCare, the best medicine in the world is still being practiced in the land of the free and the home of the brave, as
TIME Editor Stengel reports, in spite of himself:
To learn more about Aisha, and how an NGO is helping her get reconstructive surgery in the United States, go to Women for Afghan Women.
Update: This just in on Twitter as we were about to publish, from twitterfriend Paul Levitt:
A friend spent several months in Afghanistan last year teaching traditional songs to women and kids … Told me of people crying at being able to sing again — the Taliban killed anyone who sang, played music.
It isn't just for the women. It's for our very humanity that we must win the war in Afghanistan.