Update: PW responds to Roger.
Geez, you try to stay out of stuff out here and they pull you back in. Thanks Stacy.
And Roger Simon takes a mild shot at "people [who] are kicking and screaming now that they are off the dole." Is that too harsh? I dunno.
In the first place, I was a PJM critic early on. That led to an ending of sorts of a bloggy friendship with Jeff as he was PJM's most vocal source of support and cheering on in the early days. One might think that still counted for something even after all this time. Apparently it doesn't given the unprofessional and juvenile shot by Simon. He is, in name I believe at least, supposed to be a CEO?
Also I believe PJM has only survived on VC money and it doesn't in anyway appear to have ever generated a profit. Are not those still engaged then also still "living on the dole?" That, again, makes the shot all the more inappropriate and unnecessary.
Having read all this stuff, at no point did I see Jeff complaining about no longer "being on the dole." He seemed displeased that he was never able to contribute more for whatever reason. And it seems that reasoning was never explained.
Some businesses and some people don't belong in business because it isn't their thing and or they have bad plans. Obviously that's true for PJM as it is effectively no longer here.
As for Simon's PJ-TV. Yeah, I guess we'll have to wait and see. Based upon many commenters at multiple blogs - blog readers are not their audience. Do they, or will they ever have an audience to support whatever infrastructure they've built up?
I have my doubts. But it isn't my money coming or going, so who cares. They certainly did nothing to manage their PR on the business side effectively over time. Now this a month out from CPAC. So it seems a commercial video company (PJ-TV) with little interest in, or involvement with independent blogs has sponsored bloggers row there and at least appears to have had some input into who was invited and who wasn't. That doesn't sound like sponsorship. It sounds like a scam.
From my view as a blogger and an outsider, aside from the notion that some bloggers were able to generate income over time – perhaps in excess of what the market outside PJM could provide – the whole episode has not been good for blogs on the Right in general terms. And as PJ-TV seems to have no interest in indie bloggers, hopefully this posting ends my bloggy interest in them.
More RiehlWorldView News
- Several Influential Conservatives Favor Comcast Merger
- Why Did Dylan Byers Discreetly Change His Mike Rogers Cumulus Story?
- Cue the Outrage Mongers: AmSpec – Michelle Malkin Is Wrong
- Why Romney’s Attack On Obama Is Misguided
- Dateline 4/11/2007: Why Chris Hayes was “quietly crying” into his sweater
- Ukraine Calls Up 40,000 Reservists
- US Navy SEALs Take Oil Tanker From Libyan Rebels
- PA Teacher Emily Nesbit, 31, ‘performed sex act on student, 18, in classroom, ‘sent partially nude photos’
- AFP: Ukraine reports Russian ‘invasion’ on eve of Crimea ‘breakaway’ vote
- Iowa Dad Stan Syring, 37 Busted For Craigslist Offer to Suck the Chrome Off A Trailer Hitch